Datasets:

prithviraj-maurya

/

adminsafesign

like 0

No

{'citation': 'Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services', 'index': 6, 'text': 'We consider not just a “single sentence or word of the statute, but rather the ‘provisions of the whole law,’ its object, and\nits policy.” (Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116051469.html#:~:text=We%20consider%20not%20just%20a,at%201004%20(quoting%20Dole%20v.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: We consider not just a “single sentence or word of the statute, but rather the ‘provisions of the whole law,’ its object, and its policy.” (Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116051469.html#:~:text=We%20consider%20not%20just%20a,at%201004%20(quoting%20Dole%20v.) Citation: Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': 'Twitter Inc. v Taamneh', 'index': 3, 'text': 'The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.) Citation: Twitter Inc. v Taamneh Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Williams v Principi', 'index': 4, 'text': '"We will depart from the strict rule of finality when the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has remanded for further proceedings only if three conditions are satisfied: (1) there must have been a clear and final decision of a legal issue that (a) is\nseparate from the remand proceedings, (b) will directly govern the remand proceedings or, (c) if reversed by this court, would render the remand proceedings unnecessary; (2) the resolution of the legal issues must adversely affect the party seeking\nreview; and, (3) there must be a substantial risk that the decision would not survive a remand, i.e., that the remand proceeding may moot the issue." (Chavez v. McDonough, https://casetext.com/case/chavez-v-mcdonough)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: "We will depart from the strict rule of finality when the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has remanded for further proceedings only if three conditions are satisfied: (1) there must have been a clear and final decision of a legal issue that (a) is separate from the remand proceedings, (b) will directly govern the remand proceedings or, (c) if reversed by this court, would render the remand proceedings unnecessary; (2) the resolution of the legal issues must adversely affect the party seeking review; and, (3) there must be a substantial risk that the decision would not survive a remand, i.e., that the remand proceeding may moot the issue." (Chavez v. McDonough, https://casetext.com/case/chavez-v-mcdonough) Citation: Williams v Principi Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': 'Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services', 'index': 6, 'text': 'We consider not just a “single sentence or word of the statute, but rather the ‘provisions of the whole law,’ its object, and\nits policy.” (Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116051469.html#:~:text=We%20consider%20not%20just%20a,at%201004%20(quoting%20Dole%20v.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: We consider not just a “single sentence or word of the statute, but rather the ‘provisions of the whole law,’ its object, and its policy.” (Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116051469.html#:~:text=We%20consider%20not%20just%20a,at%201004%20(quoting%20Dole%20v.) Citation: Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev.', 'index': 2, 'text': '"The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at\nissue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: "The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at issue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html) Citation: U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev. Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Williams v Principi', 'index': 4, 'text': '"We will depart from the strict rule of finality when the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has remanded for further proceedings only if three conditions are satisfied: (1) there must have been a clear and final decision of a legal issue that (a) is\nseparate from the remand proceedings, (b) will directly govern the remand proceedings or, (c) if reversed by this court, would render the remand proceedings unnecessary; (2) the resolution of the legal issues must adversely affect the party seeking\nreview; and, (3) there must be a substantial risk that the decision would not survive a remand, i.e., that the remand proceeding may moot the issue." (Chavez v. McDonough, https://casetext.com/case/chavez-v-mcdonough)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: "We will depart from the strict rule of finality when the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has remanded for further proceedings only if three conditions are satisfied: (1) there must have been a clear and final decision of a legal issue that (a) is separate from the remand proceedings, (b) will directly govern the remand proceedings or, (c) if reversed by this court, would render the remand proceedings unnecessary; (2) the resolution of the legal issues must adversely affect the party seeking review; and, (3) there must be a substantial risk that the decision would not survive a remand, i.e., that the remand proceeding may moot the issue." (Chavez v. McDonough, https://casetext.com/case/chavez-v-mcdonough) Citation: Williams v Principi Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Williams v Principi', 'index': 4, 'text': '"We will depart from the strict rule of finality when the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has remanded for further proceedings only if three conditions are satisfied: (1) there must have been a clear and final decision of a legal issue that (a) is\nseparate from the remand proceedings, (b) will directly govern the remand proceedings or, (c) if reversed by this court, would render the remand proceedings unnecessary; (2) the resolution of the legal issues must adversely affect the party seeking\nreview; and, (3) there must be a substantial risk that the decision would not survive a remand, i.e., that the remand proceeding may moot the issue." (Chavez v. McDonough, https://casetext.com/case/chavez-v-mcdonough)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: "We will depart from the strict rule of finality when the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has remanded for further proceedings only if three conditions are satisfied: (1) there must have been a clear and final decision of a legal issue that (a) is separate from the remand proceedings, (b) will directly govern the remand proceedings or, (c) if reversed by this court, would render the remand proceedings unnecessary; (2) the resolution of the legal issues must adversely affect the party seeking review; and, (3) there must be a substantial risk that the decision would not survive a remand, i.e., that the remand proceeding may moot the issue." (Chavez v. McDonough, https://casetext.com/case/chavez-v-mcdonough) Citation: Williams v Principi Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': 'Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services', 'index': 6, 'text': 'We consider not just a “single sentence or word of the statute, but rather the ‘provisions of the whole law,’ its object, and\nits policy.” (Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116051469.html#:~:text=We%20consider%20not%20just%20a,at%201004%20(quoting%20Dole%20v.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: We consider not just a “single sentence or word of the statute, but rather the ‘provisions of the whole law,’ its object, and its policy.” (Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116051469.html#:~:text=We%20consider%20not%20just%20a,at%201004%20(quoting%20Dole%20v.) Citation: Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': "Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen.", 'index': '1', 'text': '[T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out.'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev.', 'index': 2, 'text': '"The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at\nissue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: "The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at issue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html) Citation: U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev. Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': 'Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services', 'index': 6, 'text': 'We consider not just a “single sentence or word of the statute, but rather the ‘provisions of the whole law,’ its object, and\nits policy.” (Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116051469.html#:~:text=We%20consider%20not%20just%20a,at%201004%20(quoting%20Dole%20v.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: We consider not just a “single sentence or word of the statute, but rather the ‘provisions of the whole law,’ its object, and its policy.” (Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116051469.html#:~:text=We%20consider%20not%20just%20a,at%201004%20(quoting%20Dole%20v.) Citation: Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev.', 'index': 2, 'text': '"The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at\nissue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: "The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at issue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html) Citation: U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev. Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev.', 'index': 2, 'text': '"The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at\nissue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: "The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at issue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html) Citation: U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev. Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Williams v Principi', 'index': 4, 'text': '"We will depart from the strict rule of finality when the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has remanded for further proceedings only if three conditions are satisfied: (1) there must have been a clear and final decision of a legal issue that (a) is\nseparate from the remand proceedings, (b) will directly govern the remand proceedings or, (c) if reversed by this court, would render the remand proceedings unnecessary; (2) the resolution of the legal issues must adversely affect the party seeking\nreview; and, (3) there must be a substantial risk that the decision would not survive a remand, i.e., that the remand proceeding may moot the issue." (Chavez v. McDonough, https://casetext.com/case/chavez-v-mcdonough)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: "We will depart from the strict rule of finality when the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has remanded for further proceedings only if three conditions are satisfied: (1) there must have been a clear and final decision of a legal issue that (a) is separate from the remand proceedings, (b) will directly govern the remand proceedings or, (c) if reversed by this court, would render the remand proceedings unnecessary; (2) the resolution of the legal issues must adversely affect the party seeking review; and, (3) there must be a substantial risk that the decision would not survive a remand, i.e., that the remand proceeding may moot the issue." (Chavez v. McDonough, https://casetext.com/case/chavez-v-mcdonough) Citation: Williams v Principi Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': 'Twitter Inc. v Taamneh', 'index': 3, 'text': 'The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.) Citation: Twitter Inc. v Taamneh Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev.', 'index': 2, 'text': '"The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at\nissue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: "The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at issue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html) Citation: U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev. Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Corning Glass', 'index': 5, 'text': 'The EPA addresses “the principle of equal pay for equal work regardless of sex”. (Boyer v. United States, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116036032.html#:~:text=The%20EPA%20generally%20prohibits%20covered,206(d)(1).)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: The EPA addresses “the principle of equal pay for equal work regardless of sex”. (Boyer v. United States, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116036032.html#:~:text=The%20EPA%20generally%20prohibits%20covered,206(d)(1).) Citation: Corning Glass Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Williams v Principi', 'index': 4, 'text': '"We will depart from the strict rule of finality when the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has remanded for further proceedings only if three conditions are satisfied: (1) there must have been a clear and final decision of a legal issue that (a) is\nseparate from the remand proceedings, (b) will directly govern the remand proceedings or, (c) if reversed by this court, would render the remand proceedings unnecessary; (2) the resolution of the legal issues must adversely affect the party seeking\nreview; and, (3) there must be a substantial risk that the decision would not survive a remand, i.e., that the remand proceeding may moot the issue." (Chavez v. McDonough, https://casetext.com/case/chavez-v-mcdonough)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: "We will depart from the strict rule of finality when the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has remanded for further proceedings only if three conditions are satisfied: (1) there must have been a clear and final decision of a legal issue that (a) is separate from the remand proceedings, (b) will directly govern the remand proceedings or, (c) if reversed by this court, would render the remand proceedings unnecessary; (2) the resolution of the legal issues must adversely affect the party seeking review; and, (3) there must be a substantial risk that the decision would not survive a remand, i.e., that the remand proceeding may moot the issue." (Chavez v. McDonough, https://casetext.com/case/chavez-v-mcdonough) Citation: Williams v Principi Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': "Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen.", 'index': '1', 'text': '[T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out.'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': 'Twitter Inc. v Taamneh', 'index': 3, 'text': 'The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.) Citation: Twitter Inc. v Taamneh Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Corning Glass', 'index': 5, 'text': 'The EPA addresses “the principle of equal pay for equal work regardless of sex”. (Boyer v. United States, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116036032.html#:~:text=The%20EPA%20generally%20prohibits%20covered,206(d)(1).)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: The EPA addresses “the principle of equal pay for equal work regardless of sex”. (Boyer v. United States, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116036032.html#:~:text=The%20EPA%20generally%20prohibits%20covered,206(d)(1).) Citation: Corning Glass Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Corning Glass', 'index': 5, 'text': 'The EPA addresses “the principle of equal pay for equal work regardless of sex”. (Boyer v. United States, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116036032.html#:~:text=The%20EPA%20generally%20prohibits%20covered,206(d)(1).)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: The EPA addresses “the principle of equal pay for equal work regardless of sex”. (Boyer v. United States, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116036032.html#:~:text=The%20EPA%20generally%20prohibits%20covered,206(d)(1).) Citation: Corning Glass Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': "Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen.", 'index': '1', 'text': '[T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out.'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': 'Twitter Inc. v Taamneh', 'index': 3, 'text': 'The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.) Citation: Twitter Inc. v Taamneh Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Williams v Principi', 'index': 4, 'text': '"We will depart from the strict rule of finality when the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has remanded for further proceedings only if three conditions are satisfied: (1) there must have been a clear and final decision of a legal issue that (a) is\nseparate from the remand proceedings, (b) will directly govern the remand proceedings or, (c) if reversed by this court, would render the remand proceedings unnecessary; (2) the resolution of the legal issues must adversely affect the party seeking\nreview; and, (3) there must be a substantial risk that the decision would not survive a remand, i.e., that the remand proceeding may moot the issue." (Chavez v. McDonough, https://casetext.com/case/chavez-v-mcdonough)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: "We will depart from the strict rule of finality when the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has remanded for further proceedings only if three conditions are satisfied: (1) there must have been a clear and final decision of a legal issue that (a) is separate from the remand proceedings, (b) will directly govern the remand proceedings or, (c) if reversed by this court, would render the remand proceedings unnecessary; (2) the resolution of the legal issues must adversely affect the party seeking review; and, (3) there must be a substantial risk that the decision would not survive a remand, i.e., that the remand proceeding may moot the issue." (Chavez v. McDonough, https://casetext.com/case/chavez-v-mcdonough) Citation: Williams v Principi Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund', 'index': '0', 'text': 'For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action."'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': 'Twitter Inc. v Taamneh', 'index': 3, 'text': 'The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.) Citation: Twitter Inc. v Taamneh Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': "Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen.", 'index': '1', 'text': '[T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out.'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Corning Glass', 'index': 5, 'text': 'The EPA addresses “the principle of equal pay for equal work regardless of sex”. (Boyer v. United States, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116036032.html#:~:text=The%20EPA%20generally%20prohibits%20covered,206(d)(1).)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: The EPA addresses “the principle of equal pay for equal work regardless of sex”. (Boyer v. United States, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116036032.html#:~:text=The%20EPA%20generally%20prohibits%20covered,206(d)(1).) Citation: Corning Glass Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Williams v Principi', 'index': 4, 'text': '"We will depart from the strict rule of finality when the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has remanded for further proceedings only if three conditions are satisfied: (1) there must have been a clear and final decision of a legal issue that (a) is\nseparate from the remand proceedings, (b) will directly govern the remand proceedings or, (c) if reversed by this court, would render the remand proceedings unnecessary; (2) the resolution of the legal issues must adversely affect the party seeking\nreview; and, (3) there must be a substantial risk that the decision would not survive a remand, i.e., that the remand proceeding may moot the issue." (Chavez v. McDonough, https://casetext.com/case/chavez-v-mcdonough)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: "We will depart from the strict rule of finality when the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has remanded for further proceedings only if three conditions are satisfied: (1) there must have been a clear and final decision of a legal issue that (a) is separate from the remand proceedings, (b) will directly govern the remand proceedings or, (c) if reversed by this court, would render the remand proceedings unnecessary; (2) the resolution of the legal issues must adversely affect the party seeking review; and, (3) there must be a substantial risk that the decision would not survive a remand, i.e., that the remand proceeding may moot the issue." (Chavez v. McDonough, https://casetext.com/case/chavez-v-mcdonough) Citation: Williams v Principi Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': 'Twitter Inc. v Taamneh', 'index': 3, 'text': 'The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.) Citation: Twitter Inc. v Taamneh Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund', 'index': '0', 'text': 'For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action."'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund', 'index': '0', 'text': 'For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action."'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev.', 'index': 2, 'text': '"The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at\nissue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: "The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at issue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html) Citation: U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev. Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev.', 'index': 2, 'text': '"The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at\nissue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: "The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at issue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html) Citation: U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev. Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': 'Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services', 'index': 6, 'text': 'We consider not just a “single sentence or word of the statute, but rather the ‘provisions of the whole law,’ its object, and\nits policy.” (Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116051469.html#:~:text=We%20consider%20not%20just%20a,at%201004%20(quoting%20Dole%20v.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: We consider not just a “single sentence or word of the statute, but rather the ‘provisions of the whole law,’ its object, and its policy.” (Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116051469.html#:~:text=We%20consider%20not%20just%20a,at%201004%20(quoting%20Dole%20v.) Citation: Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': "Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen.", 'index': '1', 'text': '[T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out.'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': 'Twitter Inc. v Taamneh', 'index': 3, 'text': 'The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.) Citation: Twitter Inc. v Taamneh Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': 'Twitter Inc. v Taamneh', 'index': 3, 'text': 'The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.) Citation: Twitter Inc. v Taamneh Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': 'Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services', 'index': 6, 'text': 'We consider not just a “single sentence or word of the statute, but rather the ‘provisions of the whole law,’ its object, and\nits policy.” (Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116051469.html#:~:text=We%20consider%20not%20just%20a,at%201004%20(quoting%20Dole%20v.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: We consider not just a “single sentence or word of the statute, but rather the ‘provisions of the whole law,’ its object, and its policy.” (Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116051469.html#:~:text=We%20consider%20not%20just%20a,at%201004%20(quoting%20Dole%20v.) Citation: Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Corning Glass', 'index': 5, 'text': 'The EPA addresses “the principle of equal pay for equal work regardless of sex”. (Boyer v. United States, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116036032.html#:~:text=The%20EPA%20generally%20prohibits%20covered,206(d)(1).)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: The EPA addresses “the principle of equal pay for equal work regardless of sex”. (Boyer v. United States, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116036032.html#:~:text=The%20EPA%20generally%20prohibits%20covered,206(d)(1).) Citation: Corning Glass Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Corning Glass', 'index': 5, 'text': 'The EPA addresses “the principle of equal pay for equal work regardless of sex”. (Boyer v. United States, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116036032.html#:~:text=The%20EPA%20generally%20prohibits%20covered,206(d)(1).)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: The EPA addresses “the principle of equal pay for equal work regardless of sex”. (Boyer v. United States, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116036032.html#:~:text=The%20EPA%20generally%20prohibits%20covered,206(d)(1).) Citation: Corning Glass Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': 'Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services', 'index': 6, 'text': 'We consider not just a “single sentence or word of the statute, but rather the ‘provisions of the whole law,’ its object, and\nits policy.” (Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116051469.html#:~:text=We%20consider%20not%20just%20a,at%201004%20(quoting%20Dole%20v.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: We consider not just a “single sentence or word of the statute, but rather the ‘provisions of the whole law,’ its object, and its policy.” (Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116051469.html#:~:text=We%20consider%20not%20just%20a,at%201004%20(quoting%20Dole%20v.) Citation: Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Corning Glass', 'index': 5, 'text': 'The EPA addresses “the principle of equal pay for equal work regardless of sex”. (Boyer v. United States, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116036032.html#:~:text=The%20EPA%20generally%20prohibits%20covered,206(d)(1).)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: The EPA addresses “the principle of equal pay for equal work regardless of sex”. (Boyer v. United States, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116036032.html#:~:text=The%20EPA%20generally%20prohibits%20covered,206(d)(1).) Citation: Corning Glass Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev.', 'index': 2, 'text': '"The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at\nissue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: "The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at issue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html) Citation: U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev. Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': 'Twitter Inc. v Taamneh', 'index': 3, 'text': 'The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.) Citation: Twitter Inc. v Taamneh Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': 'Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services', 'index': 6, 'text': 'We consider not just a “single sentence or word of the statute, but rather the ‘provisions of the whole law,’ its object, and\nits policy.” (Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116051469.html#:~:text=We%20consider%20not%20just%20a,at%201004%20(quoting%20Dole%20v.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: We consider not just a “single sentence or word of the statute, but rather the ‘provisions of the whole law,’ its object, and its policy.” (Leming v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/116051469.html#:~:text=We%20consider%20not%20just%20a,at%201004%20(quoting%20Dole%20v.) Citation: Wright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

No

{'citation': 'Twitter Inc. v Taamneh', 'index': 3, 'text': 'The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: The only tort claim available on behalf of victims of extrajudicial killings is “an action for wrongful death.” (Borochov v. Islamic Republic of Iran, https://casetext.com/case/borochov-v-islamic-republic-of-iran-1#:~:text=The%20rest%20of%20the%20Torture,wrongful%20death.%22%20See%2028%20U.S.C.) Citation: Twitter Inc. v Taamneh Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund', 'index': '0', 'text': 'For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action."'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

Yes

{'citation': 'U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev.', 'index': 2, 'text': '"The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at\nissue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html)'}

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: For hostile-work-environment claims, an employee must show that: "(1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was subjected to harassment; (3) the harassment was based on sex; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action." Citation: Saketkoo v. Admins. of Tulane Educ. Fund Supportive? Yes Text: [T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions . . . for speaking out. Citation: Feist v. La., Dep't of Justice, Off. of the Att'y Gen. Supportive? No Text: {{text}} Citation: {{citation}} Supportive?

Can the case can be used as a citation for the provided text? Text: "The “[FLRA] may consider jurisdictional questions even where the merits of an underlying final and binding award are not at issue.” (American Federation for National Employees, National Council of Hud Locals Council 222, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Federal Labour Relations Authority, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dc-circuit/116084269.html) Citation: U.S. Dep’t of Hous. & Urb. Dev. Supportive?

citation_prediction_classification

United States v. Combs

{'circuit': 'Sixth Circuit', 'index': 6, 'text': '[R]aising the issue of judicial estoppel does not “create jurisdiction.” (McGruder v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761/pdf/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761-0.pdf)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: [R]aising the issue of judicial estoppel does not “create jurisdiction.” (McGruder v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761/pdf/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761-0.pdf) Circuit: Sixth Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Bonner v. Nicholson

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': 3, 'text': '"Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: "Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html) Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Harris v. Department of Veterans Affairs

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': 4, 'text': '“The petitioner bears the burden of establishing error in the Board’s decision.” (Erb v. Department of Treasury, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/115743836.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: “The petitioner bears the burden of establishing error in the Board’s decision.” (Erb v. Department of Treasury, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/115743836.html) Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

United States v. Combs

{'circuit': 'Sixth Circuit', 'index': 6, 'text': '[R]aising the issue of judicial estoppel does not “create jurisdiction.” (McGruder v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761/pdf/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761-0.pdf)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: [R]aising the issue of judicial estoppel does not “create jurisdiction.” (McGruder v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761/pdf/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761-0.pdf) Circuit: Sixth Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Hochstadt v. Worcester Found. for Experimental Biology

{'circuit': 'First Circuit', 'index': 2, 'text': 'Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html) Circuit: First Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Harris v. Department of Veterans Affairs

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': 4, 'text': '“The petitioner bears the burden of establishing error in the Board’s decision.” (Erb v. Department of Treasury, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/115743836.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: “The petitioner bears the burden of establishing error in the Board’s decision.” (Erb v. Department of Treasury, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/115743836.html) Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Harris v. Department of Veterans Affairs

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': 4, 'text': '“The petitioner bears the burden of establishing error in the Board’s decision.” (Erb v. Department of Treasury, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/115743836.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: “The petitioner bears the burden of establishing error in the Board’s decision.” (Erb v. Department of Treasury, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/115743836.html) Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

United States v. Combs

{'circuit': 'Sixth Circuit', 'index': 6, 'text': '[R]aising the issue of judicial estoppel does not “create jurisdiction.” (McGruder v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761/pdf/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761-0.pdf)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: [R]aising the issue of judicial estoppel does not “create jurisdiction.” (McGruder v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761/pdf/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761-0.pdf) Circuit: Sixth Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P.

{'circuit': 'Fifth Circuit', 'index': '1', 'text': 'If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to "prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus."'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to "prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus." Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Hochstadt v. Worcester Found. for Experimental Biology

{'circuit': 'First Circuit', 'index': 2, 'text': 'Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html) Circuit: First Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

United States v. Combs

{'circuit': 'Sixth Circuit', 'index': 6, 'text': '[R]aising the issue of judicial estoppel does not “create jurisdiction.” (McGruder v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761/pdf/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761-0.pdf)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: [R]aising the issue of judicial estoppel does not “create jurisdiction.” (McGruder v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761/pdf/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761-0.pdf) Circuit: Sixth Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Hochstadt v. Worcester Found. for Experimental Biology

{'circuit': 'First Circuit', 'index': 2, 'text': 'Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html) Circuit: First Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Hochstadt v. Worcester Found. for Experimental Biology

{'circuit': 'First Circuit', 'index': 2, 'text': 'Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html) Circuit: First Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Harris v. Department of Veterans Affairs

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': 4, 'text': '“The petitioner bears the burden of establishing error in the Board’s decision.” (Erb v. Department of Treasury, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/115743836.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: “The petitioner bears the burden of establishing error in the Board’s decision.” (Erb v. Department of Treasury, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/115743836.html) Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Bonner v. Nicholson

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': 3, 'text': '"Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: "Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html) Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Hochstadt v. Worcester Found. for Experimental Biology

{'circuit': 'First Circuit', 'index': 2, 'text': 'Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html) Circuit: First Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

United States v. Macklin

{'circuit': 'Second Circuit', 'index': 5, 'text': 'An indictment charging narcotics conspiracy need only allege “the existence of a narcotics conspiracy,\na relevant time frame, and the statute alleged to be violated.” (United States v. Montague, https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-montague-16)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: An indictment charging narcotics conspiracy need only allege “the existence of a narcotics conspiracy, a relevant time frame, and the statute alleged to be violated.” (United States v. Montague, https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-montague-16) Circuit: Second Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Harris v. Department of Veterans Affairs

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': 4, 'text': '“The petitioner bears the burden of establishing error in the Board’s decision.” (Erb v. Department of Treasury, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/115743836.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: “The petitioner bears the burden of establishing error in the Board’s decision.” (Erb v. Department of Treasury, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/115743836.html) Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P.

{'circuit': 'Fifth Circuit', 'index': '1', 'text': 'If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to "prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus."'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to "prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus." Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Bonner v. Nicholson

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': 3, 'text': '"Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: "Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html) Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

United States v. Macklin

{'circuit': 'Second Circuit', 'index': 5, 'text': 'An indictment charging narcotics conspiracy need only allege “the existence of a narcotics conspiracy,\na relevant time frame, and the statute alleged to be violated.” (United States v. Montague, https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-montague-16)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: An indictment charging narcotics conspiracy need only allege “the existence of a narcotics conspiracy, a relevant time frame, and the statute alleged to be violated.” (United States v. Montague, https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-montague-16) Circuit: Second Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

United States v. Macklin

{'circuit': 'Second Circuit', 'index': 5, 'text': 'An indictment charging narcotics conspiracy need only allege “the existence of a narcotics conspiracy,\na relevant time frame, and the statute alleged to be violated.” (United States v. Montague, https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-montague-16)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: An indictment charging narcotics conspiracy need only allege “the existence of a narcotics conspiracy, a relevant time frame, and the statute alleged to be violated.” (United States v. Montague, https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-montague-16) Circuit: Second Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P.

{'circuit': 'Fifth Circuit', 'index': '1', 'text': 'If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to "prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus."'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to "prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus." Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Bonner v. Nicholson

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': 3, 'text': '"Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: "Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html) Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Harris v. Department of Veterans Affairs

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': 4, 'text': '“The petitioner bears the burden of establishing error in the Board’s decision.” (Erb v. Department of Treasury, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/115743836.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: “The petitioner bears the burden of establishing error in the Board’s decision.” (Erb v. Department of Treasury, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/115743836.html) Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Phillips v. AWH Corp.

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': '0', 'text': 'Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term "in the context of the entire patent, including the specification."'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term "in the context of the entire patent, including the specification." Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Bonner v. Nicholson

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': 3, 'text': '"Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: "Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html) Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P.

{'circuit': 'Fifth Circuit', 'index': '1', 'text': 'If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to "prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus."'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to "prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus." Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

United States v. Macklin

{'circuit': 'Second Circuit', 'index': 5, 'text': 'An indictment charging narcotics conspiracy need only allege “the existence of a narcotics conspiracy,\na relevant time frame, and the statute alleged to be violated.” (United States v. Montague, https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-montague-16)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: An indictment charging narcotics conspiracy need only allege “the existence of a narcotics conspiracy, a relevant time frame, and the statute alleged to be violated.” (United States v. Montague, https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-montague-16) Circuit: Second Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Harris v. Department of Veterans Affairs

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': 4, 'text': '“The petitioner bears the burden of establishing error in the Board’s decision.” (Erb v. Department of Treasury, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/115743836.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: “The petitioner bears the burden of establishing error in the Board’s decision.” (Erb v. Department of Treasury, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-federal-circuit/115743836.html) Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Bonner v. Nicholson

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': 3, 'text': '"Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: "Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html) Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Phillips v. AWH Corp.

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': '0', 'text': 'Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term "in the context of the entire patent, including the specification."'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term "in the context of the entire patent, including the specification." Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Phillips v. AWH Corp.

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': '0', 'text': 'Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term "in the context of the entire patent, including the specification."'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term "in the context of the entire patent, including the specification." Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Hochstadt v. Worcester Found. for Experimental Biology

{'circuit': 'First Circuit', 'index': 2, 'text': 'Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html) Circuit: First Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Hochstadt v. Worcester Found. for Experimental Biology

{'circuit': 'First Circuit', 'index': 2, 'text': 'Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html) Circuit: First Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

United States v. Combs

{'circuit': 'Sixth Circuit', 'index': 6, 'text': '[R]aising the issue of judicial estoppel does not “create jurisdiction.” (McGruder v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761/pdf/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761-0.pdf)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: [R]aising the issue of judicial estoppel does not “create jurisdiction.” (McGruder v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761/pdf/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761-0.pdf) Circuit: Sixth Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P.

{'circuit': 'Fifth Circuit', 'index': '1', 'text': 'If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to "prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus."'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to "prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus." Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Bonner v. Nicholson

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': 3, 'text': '"Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: "Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html) Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Bonner v. Nicholson

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': 3, 'text': '"Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: "Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html) Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

United States v. Combs

{'circuit': 'Sixth Circuit', 'index': 6, 'text': '[R]aising the issue of judicial estoppel does not “create jurisdiction.” (McGruder v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761/pdf/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761-0.pdf)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: [R]aising the issue of judicial estoppel does not “create jurisdiction.” (McGruder v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761/pdf/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761-0.pdf) Circuit: Sixth Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

United States v. Macklin

{'circuit': 'Second Circuit', 'index': 5, 'text': 'An indictment charging narcotics conspiracy need only allege “the existence of a narcotics conspiracy,\na relevant time frame, and the statute alleged to be violated.” (United States v. Montague, https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-montague-16)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: An indictment charging narcotics conspiracy need only allege “the existence of a narcotics conspiracy, a relevant time frame, and the statute alleged to be violated.” (United States v. Montague, https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-montague-16) Circuit: Second Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

United States v. Macklin

{'circuit': 'Second Circuit', 'index': 5, 'text': 'An indictment charging narcotics conspiracy need only allege “the existence of a narcotics conspiracy,\na relevant time frame, and the statute alleged to be violated.” (United States v. Montague, https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-montague-16)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: An indictment charging narcotics conspiracy need only allege “the existence of a narcotics conspiracy, a relevant time frame, and the statute alleged to be violated.” (United States v. Montague, https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-montague-16) Circuit: Second Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

United States v. Combs

{'circuit': 'Sixth Circuit', 'index': 6, 'text': '[R]aising the issue of judicial estoppel does not “create jurisdiction.” (McGruder v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761/pdf/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761-0.pdf)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: [R]aising the issue of judicial estoppel does not “create jurisdiction.” (McGruder v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761/pdf/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761-0.pdf) Circuit: Sixth Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

United States v. Macklin

{'circuit': 'Second Circuit', 'index': 5, 'text': 'An indictment charging narcotics conspiracy need only allege “the existence of a narcotics conspiracy,\na relevant time frame, and the statute alleged to be violated.” (United States v. Montague, https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-montague-16)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: An indictment charging narcotics conspiracy need only allege “the existence of a narcotics conspiracy, a relevant time frame, and the statute alleged to be violated.” (United States v. Montague, https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-montague-16) Circuit: Second Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Hochstadt v. Worcester Found. for Experimental Biology

{'circuit': 'First Circuit', 'index': 2, 'text': 'Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html) Circuit: First Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Bonner v. Nicholson

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': 3, 'text': '"Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: "Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html) Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

United States v. Combs

{'circuit': 'Sixth Circuit', 'index': 6, 'text': '[R]aising the issue of judicial estoppel does not “create jurisdiction.” (McGruder v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761/pdf/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761-0.pdf)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: [R]aising the issue of judicial estoppel does not “create jurisdiction.” (McGruder v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761/pdf/USCOURTS-ca6-22-05761-0.pdf) Circuit: Sixth Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Bonner v. Nicholson

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': 3, 'text': '"Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: "Whether a veteran has raised a particular claim is a factual determination, outside the purview of our appellate authority.” (Randolph v. McDonough, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/23-1386/23-1386-2024-04-18.html) Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Phillips v. AWH Corp.

{'circuit': 'Federal Circuit', 'index': '0', 'text': 'Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term "in the context of the entire patent, including the specification."'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term "in the context of the entire patent, including the specification." Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open

Hochstadt v. Worcester Found. for Experimental Biology

{'circuit': 'First Circuit', 'index': 2, 'text': 'Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html)'}

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Claim construction requires determining how a skilled artisan would understand a claim term “in the context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Circuit: Federal Circuit Citation: Phillips v. AWH Corp. Text: If she has direct evidence of discrimination, the court does not wade into the McDonnell Douglas test,4 but instead the burden shifts to Performance to “prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the discriminatory animus.” Circuit: Fifth Circuit Citation: Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., L.P. Text: {{text}} Circuit: {{circuit}} Citation:

Generate the best citation for the following texts, imagining you are in the following circuits. Text: Title VII does not render employers powerless to enforce nondiscriminatory workplace rules, as "[a]n employer remains entitled to loyalty and cooperativeness from employees." (Suverino Frith and others v. Whole Foods Market Inc. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-1st-circuit/116090932.html) Circuit: First Circuit Citation:

citation_prediction_open