Datasets:

yiyic

/

devpost_project_py_descriptions

like 0

https://devpost.com/software/hacktober-chat-application

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - I WAS CURIOUS TO MAKE A CHAT APPLICATION ALWAYS, FINALLY I DID IT!! What it does: - BASED ON TCP PROTOCOL, SENDS AND RECIEVES MESSAGE FROM MULTIPLE USERS!!. How we built it: - USING PYTHON, COLOROMA MODULE :) What we learned: - LIVE TRANSMISSION BASED LOGIC ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/csv-database-maker-and-backup

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - I got to know about Appwrite during the 2021 Hacktoberfest. It's an Open Source backend server for developers. I have been contributing to this project for the past 2 weeks and wanted to make a project using this application. What it does: - You can very easily make a cloud database using Appwrite. My project will allow you to make a database on Appwrite and convert it a .csv file which can be easily used for various other tasks like extracting meaning from the database using Machine Learning or can also act as an offline backup of your cloud database which will periodically upload the data to your Dropbox account. How we built it: - I used Python Language for this project and used 2 APIs for it: Appwrite and Dropbox. It basically takes the data from Appwrite using the API which is in JSON format and converts it to CSV. After that it will take the Dropbox API key of the user upload it to their account. Challenges we ran into: - The biggest challenge I faced here was converting the JSON file into an .csv file. When appwrite calls for data from the server, it can call max 100 entries at once. If you have more than 100 records it will call them in batches. It took me some time to join the new data into a single file while also maintaining the same headings. Previously I used pandas for it but it became way to big of a file to be used as a cloud function for Appwrite. You can use it to send your data locally but I wanted it to be more optimised. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The best feeling I got while making the project that I optimised the code and run it even more quickly and that too with even less dependencies. Also I got to know how to use JSON data while converting it to .csv file. What we learned: - Usage of APIs\nHow to read JSON data\nReading and Understanding Documentation What's next for CSV Database Maker and Backup: - One should not be just limited with Dropbox and I will like to add a new functionality where you can select where you want to store the data. Be it locally, Amazoon S3, Goole Cloud or even Appwrite itself\nI am also thinking of providing some visual representation of the database after downloading it using seaborn library in Python. I would probably like to use an API for it as database can contain various types of values as it data. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/text-bases-game

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - A text-based fun game in python. User has 10 chances to play with the opponent and has to make the score more than opponent How we built it: - With basic Python modules and script and wp client used for speak function Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Tried text based game with python in which I have not much experience What we learned: - How basic python and functions works out What's next for the Python game: - Trying to add some script for a more user-friendly experience while playing ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/connect-4-game-posw0f

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Inspired by MLH LHD What it does: - A simple Connect 4 game How we built it: - We built it using Python3 Challenges we ran into: - Challenge of using Connect4 liberary. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Though our teammate didn't has knowledge of Python , we made it!! What we learned: - Very New things about the Liberary What's next for Connect 4 Game: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/connect4-terminal-game

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - LHD Learn Challenge What it does: - Starts a connect 4 game in the terminal How we built it: - I built it using python Challenges we ran into: - Was not familiar with classes and objects in python and self keyword. Took some time to learn that.\nImplementing GUI was difficult Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Project works in terminal What we learned: - OOP in python What's next for Connect4 terminal game: - Implement a GUI ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/python-automation-tool-to-sent-email-using-web-scrapping

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - By creating this project I got to know that I have the potential to create more such projects with the help of Python What it does: - This tool is very helpful to send emails automatically. How we built it: - \nThis python Automation tool helps to extract the content of the given website with the help of packages requests.\nAfter the process of extraction the library called BeautifulSoup4 is used to scrap the content of the Website, content like link/domain, etc.\nThen set up of Email-Authentication is used with the help of python package Smtplib library Authentication system \nAfter setting up the Email-Authentication system we are now able to create the body of the email and any other information which is needed to sent email to others\nFinally Email is sent.\n Accomplishments that we're proud of: - I'm very proud that I have created my first project in the Domain of Automation it has been a great experience to learn new technologies. What we learned: - I have learned the uses of new python Libraries, how automation works. I have also learned some tips and tricks to debug the errors ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/automation-of-zoom

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - LHD-learn 2022 What it does: - When executed it automatically joins the links of zoom when provided with I'd and password by the user hours before the meeting. How we built it: - Python programming was used. Challenges we ran into: - There were many errors and failures during process but we managed to do it . Accomplishments that we're proud of: - we were able to make a zoom-bot What we learned: - knowledge about power of python programming What's next for Automation Of Zoom: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/how-to-automate

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Our team wanted to work on School Management System and make a program to automate that process. What it does: - Our project manages the SQL database using python and make things easier. How we built it: - Firstly we learn connectivity of SQL database with python and we found a way and then made a program that take input through user for different purposes and make changes using that data into SQL database according to User . Challenges we ran into: - It was difficult for us to make connectivity of MySQL with python and passing values form python to SQL and vice-versa . Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We're proud to complete the project in less time by self learning and team contribution. What we learned: - We learned time management, perfectly splitting word, code, self learning new things, etc What's next for How to Automate: - I hope everyone can have an idea to automate some daily work ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/learn-how-to-automate-i3pyga

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - It is the task of DAY-1 MLH-LHD. What it does: How we built it: - using python. Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: - learned a lot of things while projects going on. What's next for learn how to automate.: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/automating-whatsapp

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH LHD Build What it does: - It automatically sends some general text in regular interval of the time. How we built it: - Using Python What we learned: - I learnt new concepts which helps me to build this project. What's next for Automating WhatsApp: - I will try to add more features like sending bulk messages to one selected person. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/stop-sign-detection

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH LHD Learn What it does: - It detects stop sign in the image How I built it: - Using python opencv What's next for Stop Sign Detection: - I'll try to add some new functions so it can recognize more than one stop sign at a time. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/choose-your-own-adventure-6h09gf

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Night-House text adventure game and horror stories What it does: - It is a text based story game revolving around a 8 year old kid How we built it: - We built it using python in vs code and from a rough draft of the story Challenges we ran into: - The main challenge during the coding time was to create a battle system Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We where able to complete the whole project in a small amount of time even though we all are beginners What we learned: - We learned the use of function and condition statements to its fulliest What's next for CHOOSE-YOUR-OWN-ADVENTURE: - We are gonna create the successor of the story very soon ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/email-sorter-rofk8m

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - this program helps us to sort emails on basis of importance level of the sender and the best part is its automated this doesn't require human interaction all the times, set it up once and its ready to go . How we built it: - we used purely python to build it. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/system-weather-cli

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - own weather and system info cli What it does: - It shows current weather data from api and local system info by command line argument. How we built it: - using python3 Challenges we ran into: - finding ascii art for different os. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - I successfully use of weather api from openweathwermap.org What we learned: - api fetch and json . What's next for system&weather CLI: - advanced desktop app. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/manage-your-finance

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH-LHD What it does: How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for Manage your finance: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/matchhighlights

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Day 1 Challenge: - Wanted to mess around with API's and also leverage it with our favorite sport - FOOTBALL! - Things that we learned : - \nHow to collaborative and solve a specific problem.\nLearned a bit about Flask.\n - Things to keep in mind : - This is an unfinished project of ours. We have achieved the very basic goal that we wanted, which was provide the highlights of the latest match by searching up the team's name. - We need to work on the following later : - \nError handling. \nCreating a better UI.\n ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/learn-to-connect-two-apis-together

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Our hackathon inspired us to create this project. What it does: - It merges two APIs together to work properly. How we built it: - We built it using python and VS Code. Challenges we ran into: - The challenges that we faced are :Firstly it was very difficult to merge the APIs together. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Our biggest accomplishment is the creation of the project itself. What we learned: - We learned API integration with the creation of this project. What's next for Learn to connect two APIs together: - There are many things ahead. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/automate-social-media

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH - LHD ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/document-scanner-p02vor

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH - LHD ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/adventure-game-06d4ag

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration-:to make a game to get rid of boredom: What it does-:it is a simple text based game: How we built it-: using simple python language: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of-: we are proud that we had made it: What we learned-: python: What's next for adventure game: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/connect-four-game-0mr3op

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH - LHD ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/iot-pufitd

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH - LHD ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/chat-application-29yx83

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH - LHD ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/text-based-adventure-game-hpjbef

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - LHD Learn2022 What it does: - it is text game where u travel in a room around objects How we built it: - using python Challenges we ran into: - difficulty in making a character move around the space Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Successfully completing the challenge What we learned: - python programming ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/working-with-computer-vision

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - We can play stone paper scissors. How we built it: - Using openCV ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/automated-foldering

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - sometimes all I do was download or copying files from my drive and forgot to rearrange it till the time I need my files and it's so hard to find the file I'm looking for since I can't even remember when I download it where I save it or what my file name What it does: - This script automatically re-located your file from the folder you desired to a subfolder based on the file format How we built it: - I use watchdog to monitor file system events and logs events generated. Then relocated every file names collected to the subfolder using python os What we learned: - using watchdog the first time and using schedule on python What's next for Automated Foldering: - Using NLP to filtering document based on it topic and relocated to its subfolder based on topic ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/auto-reminder-via-whatsapp

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - My mother is a teacher at a Sr. Secondary School. She teaches 9th and 10th grade students. While going through the challenges, I saw a challenge to automate things. I have seen many times that my mom is sharing meeting ids for online classes to her students at the evening for tuition classes. I saw this as an perfect opportunity to both help my mom and also submit a project to the MLH event. What it does: - I have made a python script which will take all the numbers and name from an Online Database and send them a message every evening at 4:00 pm. I have used the appwrite cloud functions to deploy my project to the cloud(localhost) and assigned a CRON values for it to execute everyday at 4:00 pm in the evening. I can always add more recipients to the list by adding more users in the database. Thus, handling who gets and who doesn't gets the message easily. How we built it: - I used Twilio API to send the WhatsApp messages. Basically it will loop through all the phone numbers in the database and send them a message via Twilio. I used Python language to build this function. After that i uploaded the function to Appwrite and set a CRON function to make it excecute every day at 4:00 pm in the evening. Challenges we ran into: - I didn't faced any major challenges while making this. It has already been 2 weeks since I have been doing Open Source work with Appwrite so I'm quite familiar with using it. Learning about Twilio was also not a major issue as they have an amazing tutorial on their website on how to use it. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - I'm proud that I got to know how to use Twilio and this API will always remain in my mind when I need to send messages via code. What we learned: - Twilio\nString formatting What's next for Auto Reminder via WhatsApp: - While going through Twilio, I realized that I can easily make many more functions and can send these messages via various ways. These additional features can be implemented in the project as well. Also thinking of adding an Email functionality where it will send Emails daily rather than WhatsApp messages ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/whatsappautomation-q3dkb8

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: What it does: - It can be used by you to spam yours friends inbox without typing it yourself How we built it: - We used python to make the project Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for WhatsappAutomation: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/connecting-4-games

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: What it does: How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for Connecting 4 games: - We have learned so many things by building this ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/connect-four-games

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLHLHD2022 What it does: - connection of 4 games using python How we built it: - Python Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for Connect Four Games: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/instagram-unfollow-for-unfollow

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH-LHD Api use. What it does: - When someone unfollows your account on Instagram this program will unfollow the person instantly.\nIt can also work the other way around if you run it with those settings How we built it: - We used a python Instagram function and just enhanced its functionality many times. Challenges we ran into: - The Api we used stop working in between so we needed to start again... What we learned: - We learned how to use Apis and implement them to make our lives easier. What's next for Instagram Unfollow-for-Unfollow: - We hope to make a Android app for it so that it is easy for everybody to use. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/learn-about-computer-vision-3mtxqv

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH - LHD What it does: - Cartoonify images How we built it: - Using Computer Vision Challenges we ran into: - Various filters Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Easy Approach What we learned: - Cartoonify images using computer vision What's next for Learn about Computer Vision: - Edges detection using computer vision ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/connect-four-game-afemik

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH LHD 2022 What it does: - It is a 2 player connection board game, in which the players choose a color and then take turns dropping colored discs into a seven-column, six-row vertically suspended grid. How we built it: - We build this game by using Python3 Challenges we ran into: - we get a challenge when i have to import NumPy module and In horizontal and vertical locations, we create a nested for loop for the rows and columns and check an if condition statement to see if the piece has been dropped to that location on the board Accomplishments that we're proud of: - that we finally created a game using python What we learned: - we learned different libraries ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/hobit

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration - Well, I have seen and also experienced myself that a lot of developers spend hours and hours working on pc without any relaxation, so this project is simple made to remind them when to take rest.: What it does - as soon as we start this project after some time it will remind us to drink some water, and untill and unless we dont write that we drank water drink it will keep on playing, similarly for eyes relaxation also: How we built it - I have built it using python: Challenges we ran into - Since I am in my learning phase, so I have face some difficulty while putting those music files.: Accomplishments that we're proud of - I actually use it, so it is very helpful for me to decrease my screen time.: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/text-based-game-710sae

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH What it does: How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for Text-Based Game: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/learn-how-to-automate-m4v0xs

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Automation What it does: - It automatically sends an email How we built it: - We built it using python Challenges we ran into: - No such challenge Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We made automated mailing What we learned: - We learned how to automate emailing using python What's next for Learn how to Automate: - Its ready to mail ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/hangman-game-8oicgf

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH LHD Learn 2022 What it does: - A Hangman Game On Python is about guessing letters (A-Z) to form the words. If the player guesses the right letter that is within the word, the letter appears at its correct positions. The user has to guess the correct word until a man is hung, then the game is over. How we built it: - Using Python What we learned: - As the games get more and more complex, it’s a good idea to sketch out a flowchart of what should happen in your program. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/connect-four-1vdrcj

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Connect Four is simply a fun game that includes two players. As everyone loves games, playing the game made by us would definitely give an amazing satisfaction which inspired us to complete this challenge. What it does: - one after the other is supposed to fill their coin starting from the bottom most line. The one whose 4 coins(dots) get aligned vertically/horizontally/diagonally wins the game. How we built it: - We built this game using termcolor module of python. Challenges we ran into: - we faced difficulties while coding in order to get the exact output we wished for, but at the end we sorted it out Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Although the coding part was a bit difficult, we made it which we are absolutely proud of. What we learned: - To build different functions that does required tasks, collaborating with teammates. What's next for Connect Four: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/learn-how-to-automate-wnxaqo

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH What it does: How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for Learn how to Automate: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/text-based-adventure-game-bq47vd

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH LHD learn What it does: - A dual fun game How we built it: - Team effort Challenges we ran into: - Assets needed for the game Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We learned Pygame What we learned: - Python & Pygame What's next for Text-based Adventure Game: - Making an online multiplier game ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/blahaj-voyage

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - This game was inspired by Ryan talking about buying 19 Blahajs during the opening stream. After hearing this statement, I was filled with a sense of purpose towards what I must do on this lovely first day of the hackathon. What it does: - A text-based adventure game where a lonely, soul-sucking Blahaj travels across the country, from the IKEA warehouse to Ryan's house. How we built it: - Built using Python, and used JSON to store data about the enemies. Challenges we ran into: - Writing a storyline that isn't totally horrendous within the time constraints. Also, running back from Uni to submit this on Devpost. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Made a game in a day. What we learned: - JSON is convenient for storing data that doesn't change. What's next for Blahaj Voyage: - There were originally supposed to be 5 chapters (0-4), but chapter 3 was cut out due to time contraints. The plan was for Blahaj to have to navigate through some streets (aka a maze) in order to reach the house.\nAlso, it would have been nice to have all the text slowly appear on individual messages, so a separate function could be made for that. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/chat-application-e5flda

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH LHD:Learn 2022 What it does: - Chat Application How we built it: - python Accomplishments that we're proud of: - we completed the challenge ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/loan-managing-app

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - LHD What it does: - An application for managing loans to customers applying interests and repayment schedules. How we built it: - python js Challenges we ran into: - using python Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for Loan managing app: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/connect-4-game-t9hqpg

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH LHD Learn What it does: - A fun game How we built it: - Team effort Challenges we ran into: - UI dimensions Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Pygame What we learned: - Pygame What's next for Connect-4-Game: - A more fun game ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/learn-about-computer-vision-18dqfp

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration Seeing Computer Vision Projects : -: What it does Computer Vision Briefs Illustrated with Pytrhon CV project: How we built it Using Jupyter NoteBook, Python ,Notepad++: Challenges we ran into Finding the resouces to learn, and implementing our knowledge to create a project: Accomplishments that we're proud of Finally creating a project on CV: What we learned Implementation Of Computer Vision: What's next for Learn about Computer Vision Implementing it into the Real World Problems & create evaluative solution: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/zoomobot-8hbvre

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Taking attendance is something which takes about 6-7 minutes and sometimes upto 10 mintues (which is 1/4 of the time we have per class) Not only that, it is a very boring task to do. (I know because I was asked to take it 2-3 times ) What it does: - ZoomoBot first asks the user for details like meeting id or the link required to join the meeting and also ask if the user wants to filter the participants who have raised their hand or are connected to audio. It will then join the meeting, scrape the participants after applying the filter and finally mark the attendance in the Excel file. How we built it: - I used Python modules like Selenium, Openpyxl, Pynput to make this bot Challenges we ran into: - It was difficult for me to inderstand how selenium works and was facing issue extracting the namelist. I then came to know that we can excecute JavaScript using selenium which made my work a lot easier. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - I am proud that I made a bot which I myself as well as my high school teachers will use 7-8 times a day. I think this is one of my most useful project till date. What we learned: - I learned a lot about modules like Selenium and Openpyxl. Apart from that, I learned how to use JS in Selenium. Also, this is one of the longest single file python program I have written till now What's next for ZoomoBot: - I will try to use frontend module like Tkinter to make user interface better and will then convert it into an .exe file so that even the teachers who do not have python installed can run this program. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/discord-bot-1

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Daily college meet What it does: - It provides a pre loaded meeting link How we built it: - We built it using python Challenges we ran into: - running bot even when the host pc is offline Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We created a basic bot What we learned: - we learned on how to use discord api What's next for DISCORD-BOT-1: - discord music bot and meme bot ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/textbasedadventuregame

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH : Local Hack day What it does: - Text based adventure game How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for TextBasedAdventureGame: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/budget-app-esq1xz

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MLH LHD What it does: How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for Budget app: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/finance-notification

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: Difficulty in managing finances: What it does: Manages finances and budget: How we built it: Python and notification system: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/today-tech

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - After tiresome days at classes and organization meets, the last thing you want is to walk endlessly from one place to another. However, with more than 400 acres to cover, it’s inevitable at Georgia Tech – evidenced by the daily 20,000+ steps recorded on my Fitbit. Furthermore, amongst the scramble of hell-week and innumerable assignments, who has the time or brainpower to plan out every aspect of their day? - Therefore, Today@Tech creates an efficient, personalized schedule that solves this problem for all those Yellow Jackets aimlessly doing multiple rounds of Freshman Hill. - Yes, we understand walking around campus is healthy, but instead of spending an additional half-hour sweating during an afternoon commute, you'd rather spend it on a treadmill in the CRC - feel free to add it as an event :) What it does: - The user is able to input events in a day at Georgia Tech, mentioning the location(s) of these events, their duration, and/or the timeframes(s) that work for the event. Our algorithm optimizes the user's schedule to minimize the distance walked throughout the day and returns an optimal schedule. Not only does Today@Tech optimize your schedule based on more prevalent events like classes and organization meets but it also considers daily requirements like where you should eat (and even computes the most efficient place for you to eat based on the time taken to and from the location), take a break and finally, finish your day. How we built it: - Firstly, we built a Python model that took user inputs for the name, location, duration, and timeframe of the event. Next, the program validates the parameters entered by the user. For instance, it checks whether the inputted location is within a defined radius of the Google Maps API, which includes campus and its neighboring vicinity. Similarly, the timeframe is broken down into 'Start Time' and 'End Time', converted into DateTime objects, and compared with the event duration to ensure that the timeframe exceeds it. - Next, we created an (n x n) time-matrix using the Google Maps API, which computes the time taken to walk between each of the 'n' user-inputted locations. Using the hamiltonian circuit brute force algorithm, we generate the most efficient schedule for the user. - After completing the backend, we moved to the user interface where we used React.js. Lastly, we used flask to integrate python into the React.js environment and returned the result in the user interface. Challenges we ran into: - Our main challenge was integrating our UI and python files we had coded. We initially worked with Swift on Xcode, due to Apple’s robust app interface, but realized that integrating python into Swift was very difficult. Therefore, late into our project, we shifted from Swift to React.js, changing our UI from an IOS application to a web application. While this made integrating python into the code a lot more possible, it was still rather difficult and we sifted through a number of flask files to understand how to connect our backend and frontend to run properly. - We were unsure about which mathematical algorithms best computed the schedule for us. We looked into prevalent ones such as the Minimax algorithm - however, although it had the same function, it was better suited towards optimizing strategic games. We even looked at Queuing theory, which had some interesting ideas that worked with our goal but its algorithmic basis lied in ordering events slightly differently from what we required. We eventually used a combination of the AI-based hill climbing algorithm and brute force techniques to reduce the search subspace and optimize the daily schedule. - We initially used the AI based hill climbing algorithm for optimisation but our state space was too large and we were using discrete variables. Therefore, we switched to hamiltonian circuit brute force algorithms, which is capable of computing the most efficient schedule through graph theory. What we learned: - Having little or no experience in UI/UX development, we learnt Swift UI almost from scratch, as well how to integrate Python into the Swift environment. We also learnt the AI-based hill climbing algorithm as well as how to use heuristics in optimisation algorithms. We also learned how to apply mathematical tools in computing - we applied linear algebra concepts in constructing and using the time matrix between different locations. Lastly, we designed the user interface in a huge time crunch, learning how to split tasks within a team, and how to make an efficient and well designed interface. What's next for Today@Tech: - While this version has the essential features, there are several additional features such as integrating the GT bus schedule, allowing users to use cars or other modes of transports through an amended version of google API so students can plan their day outside the Georgia Tech campus too. Lastly, if we can integrate this with Tech's system, we can even allow users to choose the best locations for them to study during their day based on free locations available and much more. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/jabe

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The inspiration for this project was to allow for individuals' anonymity to be maintained in pictures without taking away from the intent of the original image through adding a bulky black box or pixelization over their face. What it does: - This project takes in an input image and uses gans to generate 10 random fake faces for each individual in the photo, and then the algorithm analyzes which of the faces are most similar to the originals and replaces the faces in the original input image with the most similar gan generated face. This helps maintain privacy without detracting from the original image with traditional censorship methods. How we built it: - We created an interface for the API that allowed the user to submit an image to censor. We used Facebook's stylegan as a basis for the random face generator. Candidate faces are extracted from the target image and an AutoEncoder is used to identify the closest synthetic face. This new face is then aligned using facial features and blended into the original image. Challenges we ran into: - We ran into several challenges during this contest including the facial replacement. Our first few attempts left a harsh box with a black outline on certain edges of the gan generated face after replacement, so we had to adjust the picture input and code to eliminate any harsh contrast between the stitched images. Since the point of our project was to maintain the effect of the original image after censorship this was an important step we had to get right. Further, it was a challenge to think of how to maintain anonymity by adjusting facial features while also keeping realistic looking features/visuals when replacing faces. We realized that by just randomly assigning a gan generated face we would run into problems on certain runs such as changing key features like an individual's gender. This is where the several gan generated images and similarity comparison with the input image came in to help decrease major changes in the original image that could possibly detract from the image. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are very proud of our final project and how real the facial replacement looks. We feel that the original image is still maintained, and many individuals would not be even able to realize that the image run was even censored if they had not seen the original image input. We feel like this is a natural next step to helping protect individuals' privacy in an age where capturing images and videos is extremely pervasive part of our culture. This will allow for privacy while maintaining the general effect/impact we hope to capture with these photos and videos. Our team sees many applications for this project and are very proud to see what a strong product we could create in such a short period of time. What we learned: - We were able to build off our team's existing knowledge of gans, image processing, APIs, and user interface to think of a unique application of these skills. Further, we were able to learn more about the application of these methods when looking into current best practices and code that is available to read about and adjust for our application. Finally, we learned about the nuances of working with images and getting them to look real. Even a slight deviation or issue with the algorithm and its application can lead to major visual distortions that takes away from the image's impact. What's next for Image Anonymizer: - We are hoping to look into taking this project to the next step by expanding application of the anonymized gan generated features. One way we intend to do this is by applying this technique to videos. There are several applications were an individuals image would want to be censored, and this seems like a natural next step. However, the large amount of data and therefore processing power would definitely make it a difficult undertaking that would need more time. Further, we hope to improve the algorithms ability to take in and process faces at all angles. Finally, we may look into how to adjust distinctive landmarks in the background to further protect the individual's privacy. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/commitbot

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We were inspired by seeing how our contribution graphs started to fill up with commits on Github, we had the idea to create CommitBot. CommitBot provides users with all the clout of being a hardworking software developer without having to do any of the work! What it does: - CommitBot creates a private target repository in the user's account. That way the people visiting your profile can't seem the details of them and it looks like you are hard at work on a super secret project. CommitBot will then create a variable amount of commits (between 0 and 10) to this repository each day to vary the activity levels (and thus your contribution graph). How we built it: - CommitBot leverages the PyGithub API to interact with the target repository. It also uses Github actions to automatically run the workflow each day and thus reaching a new commit block on the contributions graph. Challenges we ran into: - We originally wanted to create a mobile app for a betting app idea that our team had. However, it became clear that we were not going to finish the project in time, so we decided to pivot to CommitBot. Mobile apps are hard. What we learned: - The biggest thing we learned was how to use Github actions to automatically configure and run the main python files. None of us were super familiar with it before this weekend and we spent like 2 hours trying to debug a weird problem we had. Turns out it was a typo... ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/searchify

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We were inspired to create something that made parts of our regular lives easier with data, and also combine our interests in humanities and STEM. What it does: - Searchify is designed to quickly create curated playlists based on the most popular songs from a specific theme. How we built it: - We used the Spotipy Library, which is a Python library designed to read the Spotify library. We also used Flask to create the web app. Finally, for the UI, we used an assortment of different UI tools Challenges we ran into: - None of us had much web design experience, so turning our python code into a flask app was difficult. We also had issues with the cache causing errors that seemed unexpected. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We were able to design a web app with little to no web experience. We’re also really proud of our presentation video. Finally, our algorithm to decide what songs are the best is an accomplishment to us. We used logistic regression to ensure that the popularity of songs was adjusted properly and that some didn’t overpower others. What we learned: - We learned how to build a larger project, split it effectively, and work cohesively. We learned a lot about reading from Python Libraries. What's next for Searchify: - We would like to add multiple keyword search, where the user could select multiple words. Another feature is better weighting on which songs are considered “best” -- we would like to incorporate the recency, and even the user’s personal tastes into the algorithm. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/speedmart

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Did you know people spend more than 36% of their salary on purchase of essentials? 77% of people buy grocery every week. 95% of the time, people make similar purchases. An average buyer spends at least 30mins per week on making the right shopping list. There are many items that users purchase periodically. For e.g. if its bread, they probably need it everyday, groceries probably every 10 days and for people who have little kids, they probably need diapers on a monthly basis. Therefore, just curating the list for buyers exactly when they need it presents a huge opportunity for sales conversion. Leveraging the power of AI and NCR apps, we bring to you, your own personalized instant shopping cart. Our machine learning model takes into account your purchase history e.g. frequency of purchase of an item, last time of purchase, average duration between purchases and predicts what you need and when you need it. We are offering functionality for the future of retail, none of the bigger retail brands currently provide this feature. What it does: - You receive the notification that your instant cart is ready. Instead of scrolling through so many items, you go to the instant cart by clicking here. You can see, the items have been pre-populated as per your purchase trends. You can modify the quantity, select/de-select items and then with a single click, place your order. Voila! Shopping all done. \nAs a business, using speedmart gets you increased sales conversion and customer retention. Not only that, our predictive model can also help businesses optimize their supply chain through better inventory planning. For customers, our solution saves their time and provides a seamless experience. How we built it: - We used Javascript, HTML, CSS, Python for ML, NCR catalog and order APIs Challenges we ran into: - We ran into numerous problems with getting the NCR API work correctly. We dived into documentation and experimented with APIs to understand their functionalities. We are new grad students who worked together for the first time we are happy we were able to coordinate successfully. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We started without a pre defined idea. The way we transitioned from ideation phase to working product is something we are really proud of. What we learned: - Working in a team. We got good understanding of use-cases for NCR APIs and motivation for their design. What's next for SPEEDMART: - Obtain more data after deployment and improve prediction algorithm by including more parameters as we work on larger data set. Extend this POC to retail stores. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/recipehub

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Do you have lots of ingredients sitting around, slowly aging, that you can't think of a recipe for? Consider this: around 40% of the US food supply is wasted due to over-ordering, spoilage, and other factors according to the USDA. What if you could simply look at your ingredients and instantly come up with an amazing recipe? What it does: - Well there is way. RecipeHub uses computer vision to scan and detect ingredients using your phone's camera so you don't need to lift a finger. After you've scanned your ingredients RecipeHub sends a request to our backend API, asking for recipes that share ingredients with the ones you've provided. Our API responds with a list of matching recipes which are then displayed in the app. Users can favorite recipes for easy access and also search for recipes normally using our intelligent search field. How we built it: - The mobile app was built using SwiftUI, Apple's latest app development framework. While most features are implemented directly with SwiftUI, some parts, like the camera preview, require an interface to UIKit. This interface performs the object detection on device using the Vision framework. - We were able to train the model using only 1 image per class (i.e. 1 image per ingredient) thanks to Turi Create's one-shot object detection (OSOD) algorithm. The OSOD algorithm uses the provided images to generate thousands of synthetic images by overlaying each object on a collection of sample images, automatically generating the necessary bounding boxes and occasionally distorting parts of the image to train the model. A sample image generated by the algorithm is provided at the end of the image gallery. Challenges we ran into: - Our original training images had dimensions of around 1000x1000 however the OSOD algorithm is designed to accept images no larger than 500x500. Therefore most of the synthetic data didn't actually include our training data due to the applied transformations, meaning the resulting model was not accurate. Since the actual training takes around an hour for 5 images, we needed to be very careful to properly format our images. Thankfully our second attempt was successful and the model was able to accuracy detect ingredients. - Also, accessing and managing video data from a phones camera and feeding that data our model was a little tricky, especially since the camera can output data faster than the model can process it. Thankfully there was a lot of online documentation and sample code that we were able to take advantage of. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The final model was (a lot) more accurate than we initially thought it would be, especially since it was only given one image per ingredient. The app is smooth, easy to use, and has a nice appearance. Also, the API is currently running smoothly on our VPS so anyone in the world can use our app. What we learned: What's next for RecipeHub: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/investigatar

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - As the pandemic begins to subside, stores have begun to open, but many people are now comfortable with the ease of technology at their fingertips while shopping. This begs the question of how we can incorporate technology to create an immersive in-store experience. - Another important issue for both retailers and consumers is miscommunication. How big is this couch really? Will this chair fit under my desk? Does my backpack have enough space to hold this? Is this ethically sourced? Is there anything else just like this? - InvestigatAR aims to bridge the gap between technology and in-store experiences as well as reduce this miscommunication to consumers via a mobile application powered by Machine Learning, AR, and Crowdsourcing. InvestigatAR allows customers to analyze products and make informed decisions by utilizing our AR features, reviews, sustainability scores, and more! - InvestigatAR has three guiding principles: - \nSensibility\nSustainability\nScalability\n What it does: - By scanning QR codes in our app, users are able to see a full scale model of the assembled product at the tips of their fingers. Using our Spring Boot server and NCR's Catalog API, users are able to see the name, reviews, description, pricing, and other critical information of the product. Don’t know what a product is? Scan it. Using an image recognition and object detection model, we can show you the closest matches in other products AND show information about whether the product is sustainable for the environment, comes from ethical sources, and has good reviews. How we built it: - Starting from the cloud down. - The backend is built with Spring Boot, Spring Security, MongoDB, JSON Web Tokens for Authentication, and Java Unirest to communicate with NCR’s Catalog API, all deployed to a remote server on Heroku. What all of those words mean is that we send and collect information from our cross platform application to display all the information on screen: user profiles, reviews, AR models, machine learning-powered analysis, and more. - The frontend is built in Typescript, React Native, Redux, Google ML, and VIRO AR. First, we authenticate users against our database, allowing them to register if they do not have an account. Users can then scan QR codes or objects, and then see AR models and reviews associated with the product. They are also able to see the history of everything they’ve scanned. In addition to this, our mobile application has the capability to run on both Android and iOS since it is built in React Native. Challenges we ran into: - Two Big Things: Incorporating sponsor APIs and object detection into the mobile app. Incorporating the NCR API took a lot of trial and error and calls with NCR engineers, until finally becoming a core part of our server. From the ashes rose the phoenix (or just a small bird) of the server side. Being able to catalog data adds a huge benefit to our application, with retailers being able to update item inventory, descriptions, names, and more. - We initially started with using built-in libraries in React Native to serve predictions for object detection. Unfortunately, our application could neither object nor detect. After spending multiple (i.e more time than should ever be spent) hours on trying to fix dependencies for TensorFlowLite for React Native, we did what any sane team would do and redid the entire code so that we could instead use TensorFlow.js. And guess what? That also did not work either. So, instead of using TensorFlow, we decided to go with an API call to ClarifAI, which hosts a pretrained ML model for image classification. Now, we are able to recognize clothing AND display AR models of what we have in our catalogue. Pretty neat. We further wanted to improve this feature by reducing our dependencies on open-source apis, and instead developed our own API using Flask that serves predictions using a state-of-the-art deep learning PyTorch YOLO Object detection model. After a bit of debugging, we were successful in integrating this endpoint into our platform. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Augmented reality and our server. Getting our app to display a variety of models and having a server to back all of these requests is extremely cool and took the vast majority of our time. - There are a variety of AR objects and sustainability scores! The sustainability scores were key to our design because we want users to shop for alternatives that help the environment and that is a lot easier when they can see exactly what those are. - As a side note, our UI also took a lot of time, and most people won’t notice (which is the point). Shoutout to Vivek for (mostly) single handingly designing it. What we learned: - Two of our team members had no experience with any of the Tech Stack before this hackathon. By the end, they became crucial parts, learning React Native, Spring Boot, and UI design. - Our other two team members learned the importance of friendship. In more serious matters, they learned how to make object recognition on mobile devices user friendly, connect to our server, and display it all in the span of 6 hours. What's next for InvestigatAR: - Create better classification models, including user input on how accurate rankings are. Add many more AR models of all different brands, types, and shapes of every object imaginable. Furthermore, we are looking into webscraping HowGood, the world's largest sustainability database. Product reviews can also be labeled and filtered with sentiment analysis to allow users to filter by positive/negative reactions. Oh, and we'll probably sleep for a week before that. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/gt-dining-detective

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We were inspired by waiting in line at the Brittain dining hall for over 30 minutes while trying to get lunch last week, and when we finally got to the front there was little food left, and we had to wait an additional 10 minutes for fresh food to be brought out. What it does: - The app utilizes a neural network and predicts what times the dining halls are the busiest and how low on food they are. By using user input and predefined data, the neural network trains itself to better predict dining hall conditions over time. We hope to provide students with a reliable way to avoid the busiest times and long waits. How we built it: - We used Android Studio and Java to build the framework of the app and Python to write the machine learning required to build the neural network. Challenges we ran into: - Our largest challenge was communicating between the front-end Java logic and the back-end Python neural network. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are very proud of our successful implementation of a neural network based off of over 10,000 distinct data points instead of a basic linear regression model along with efficiently storing user data through the use of CSV files. And while not as technical, our visual design is also something we are quite proud of. What we learned: - We learned how to incorporate a variety of different languages together into a single visual application. We also improved our Android Studio development skills and, for the first time, managed large CSV file to efficiently store user data into the limited memory space of an app. What's next for GT Dining Detective: - In the future, we would like to use a Cloud service to store the data of a large number of users, along with utilizing Google's API to improve the accuracy of our app. We would also like to port the app to IOS in the future. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/fudge-it

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - While exploring the different winners for the NCR Challenges from previous years, we found a project (Foodie Buddie) that inspired us to use the NCR API as a way for consumers to easily order after being recommended food that's fit for their budget and preferences. What it does: - After getting onto the site, you set your preferences and your current budget and it will sift through existing restaurants to find good food using a custom-built price rating system, user rating system, and a preference on food items. How we built it: - We built it using Python, Django, and the NCR BSP API. Django is used to set up and run the website and we used the NCR BSP API to handle orders after a user has decided on a restaurant. Challenges we ran into: - The main challenges we ran into were figuring out how to use the NCR BSP API, coming up with creative ideas, and also learning the tech/languages we had to use. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We came up with an awesome idea, came up with a design document that includes how data is modeled, delegated work properly towards people with expertise, then executed well on our idea. What we learned: - We learned so much altogether in terms of trying to come up with a practical idea and exploring the NCR API's to see how feasible it'd be. What's next for Fudge-it: - We can see how we can populate Fudge-it using geographical data from the Google Maps API and how we can upgrade our price rating system and use something like the dollar sign system seen on Google Maps. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/zen-k1w6ri

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - There is no doubt that life the past few years has been hectic to say the least. That is why we built Zen, a device that is equal parts complex data-visualization tool and gorgeous art piece. Underneath the calming sandy surface of Zen lies a complex mechanism built from the scrapped parts of a broken 3d printer. A robotic arm magnetically guides a stainless steel marble in the sand to create grooves that can tell you the time, display text, and more. This combination of art with data reminds us that there is always beauty in information: you just need to dig a bit deeper. What it does: - An onboard microcontroller first chooses what data it wishes to display: say the current time. Using computer vision, we calculate the coordinates that would carve out the numbers in the sand. These coordinates are passed through our custom pathing algorithm to determine a most efficient route, which is then sent to the mechanical assembly. An on-board computer translates the rectangular coordinates to polar coordinates to determine which angle and radius values to move the magnetic arm. As the arm traces its path under the surface of the table, the magnetic ball slowly imprints out the number in the sand, giving us a dynamic and physical means to visualize data. How we built it: - To view the plotting process in real time, follow the Colab notebook here. The project broke down into software focused on the plotting algorithm and hardware focusing on the mechanism of the magnetic arm. The software team used the opencv library to skeletonize the paths of a single-stroke font family. This allowed us to select the coordinates of the image that should be part of the letter/number and put them into our algorithm that will trace an optimal path through those points whilst removing outliers at the same time. This trace information can therefore be used to plot any set of letter and numbers, as long as they fit within the dimensions of the display. - The hardware side involved iterating over several designs until we settled on the current radially pointed magnetic arm. A lot of soldering, CADing, sawing, lasering, and drilling eventually gave us the semi-transparent design for Zen. Challenges we ran into: - On the hardware side, we ran into several issues, the biggest being that the tolerances from our 3d prints were too tight, leading to our entire assembly being unable to spin freely around the center. But with a little ingenuity (and a little hammering), we managed to salvage the situation without having to cut, break, sand, or print any new parts. On the software side, we were dealing with an unfamiliar library and for some, a completely new language, so we first had to climb a learning curve to come out on the other end successful. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - With this being the third hackathon we have completed together as team Big Fishies, we have noticed a significant increase in both our design quality and aesthetics. The overall look of the device and it's capabilities has demonstrated our collective growth as a team of engineers and a group of friends. What we learned: - We came into this project idea unsure about whether we would be able to complete this goliath task over the course of the short 36 hours we were allotted. Learning new languages, new skills, and new techniques in such a short amount of time is never an easy task, but creating Zen has been the challenge that has proven there are no limits to the things we can accomplish. What's next for Zen: - We have more plans for what sort of information we can display on our 550 square inch sand display. Using complex apis, we can display stock charts in real time, or even communicate wirelessly with a drawing application to allow users to draw their own paths in the sand. There are as many possibilities for Zen as there are grains of sand on Earth. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/votr

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - As we advance into an ever-increasing digital age, the emergence of online elections are inevitable. Its advantages are numerous, ranging from increases in voter turnout from the internet's wide span to decreases in carbon footprint from the countless paper ballots used in today's elections. However, amidst rising concerns around voter fraud and voter suppression, it is important that online voting is equitable, accessible, and secure. - While blockchain technology dominates the world of cryptocurrency, the technology on its own is also applicable in creating robust online elections due to its architecture. Online elections facilitated through blockchain technology are fundamentally immutable, anonymous, and secure by linking nodes containing encrypted voter identity and ballot data. Tampering with ballot data would not be possible as this would alter the hash code of one block, hence causing discrepancies with every other block that comes after it, as blocks are also based upon the hash code of the preceding block. - This allows secure attainment, recording, and reporting of votes. While the government is able to validate votes, people are able to verify their votes by generating their unique voter hash code and querying it with a transaction in the blockchain voting record. What Votr does: - Votr models the process of a blockchain election by utilizing python to implement a blockchain mechanism which stores online ballot data. Users are able to view the blockchain, cast a vote if they are registered, and lookup the record of their ballots through their block number containing their transaction. After a voter votes, their voter hash is removed from the registered voters, and added to a blacklisted voter hash collection in order to prevent voting more than once. How we built Votr: - Our ballot record blockchain is made secure through the SHA-256 cryptographic hash functions which hashes the concatenation of a voter's credentials (name, date of birth, and social security number) on the frontend, and securely sends this hash to the backend. This hash is then combined with the vote number, previous vote hash, and vote choice to form as new hash for the individual vote block that is added onto the chain. Before adding each block to the blockchain, Votr checks that the voter is allowed to vote in this election, by comparing the voter hash to the hash stored in a database of allowed voters. As you can see, the plain text of a voters credentials are never actually stored which key to maintaining anonymity and protecting voter privacy. In order to integrate our blockchain backend with our React.js frontend, we used the django rest framework to provide api endpoints. After a vote is cast, the voter receives the unique block id of the vote on the chain. They can put this block id into a user input at any time, which will then fetch the current vote choice of that block to show the user that their vote is intact and as they intended it to be. Challenges we ran into: - Understanding the blockchain architecture involved reading and understanding theoretical knowledge before writing any code. Furthermore, learning how to implement a private blockchain without mining functionality rather than a public blockchain was especially difficult considering the dominance of cryptocurrency-related online education surrounding blockchain. - We also had difficulties figuring out how to facilitate communication between our blockchain and our client side. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We're especially proud that we were able to implement a functioning blockchain and help provide a proof of concept for the digitization of elections. Also, we are proud of showcasing blockchain technology's potential beyond cryptocurrency to improve legacy systems. What we learned: - We learned about Blockchain architecture and how to implement one. Specifically, we gained an appreciation for the SHA-256 hashing algorithm, and how to detect whether a blockchain has been tampered with. We also honed our skills in web development, especially in React.js and Django. What's next for Votr: - We hope to add a client side page where users can register to vote, and add their voter credentials hash stored in Postgresql database. We also hope to give voters the ability to update their ballot at any time before the election closes. We could do this by adding a new block to the chain, and only counting the latest ballot block in the chain from a voter in the final tally. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/better-buzzes

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - That feeling where you are waiting for a bus and desperately have somewhere to be, we know it's frustrating! Current bus routes often have unreliable time estimations as well as counterintuitive user interfaces. College students are in need of a new bus system that prioritizes their movements around campus and notifies them of recent changes in schedule. This is why we created Better Buzzes, a mobile app that utilizes reinforcement machine learning to create optimal bus schedules that reduce waiting time and provide a better riding experience. What it does: How we built it: - To build the app we first created a model that would be able to simulate the GT bus system given already known mass student behavior. Then, utilizing a policy gradient method, the buses schedules were altered over many iterations to optimize the total student wait time. Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for Better Buzzes: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/purelycurly

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Our team - Kendra and Kelly - both grew up with curly hair, and we've learned that curly-haired people have it hard! All the pictures of luscious, frizz-free curls can take a village and more to achieve, and we were tired of trying product after product only to find they made our hair greasy or didn't provide near the 200% moisture levels our hair needed. So, we decided to create a site to help others through their wavy and curly-haired journeys! What it does: - Our site allows established curly-haired people to input their hair type (Type 2, 3, or 4) and products that have worked for them to build a database of products that work best for them. Through our site, people who are looking for product recommendations can input their hair type and top products that have worked for others with their similar hair type will be outputted. Additionally, those who are new to understanding their curls can input a picture of their hair and our computer vision algorithm will detect the curl pattern they have to inform them. How we built it: - Our website was built with Bootstrap. The functionality was fleshed out with javascript to handle user data and PHP to process image inputs. For the computer vision algorithm, the training weights for the curl pattern detection were created using the YOLO algorithm on various images of each curl pattern. To integrate the curl pattern detection, we called a Python script, which was returned to PHP. Challenges we ran into: - The computer vision object detection was the most difficult piece of our project because it took most of the weekend to train. Additionally, when we trained images that included the face, the algorithm learned how to detect the top of the hair. We had to adjust the images so that only posterior hair shots were included in our training. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are proud of the features in our site. We believe that these features will allow fellow wavy- and curly-headed users to get more information on how to take care of their hair. Collecting the experience data of different users makes the recommendations more accurate. What we learned: - We learned more about web development and handling user data input. Additionally, we learned how to integrate Machine Learning into websites for full functionality. Also, it is ideal for our users to input images with shots from behind to ensure the most accuracy. - Overall skill-wise, we learned more about PHP, JavaScript, Web Dev, and YOLO. What's next for PurelyCurly: - In the future, we hope to create a more robust training set for the curl pattern detection. This training set will include more hair colors, hair lengths, picture qualities, and angles of hair photos to accommodate as many different users as possible. Furthermore, we hope to draw patterns in the ingredients we find users with similar hair types using. For example, if Coconut Oil is a recurring ingredient in the Type 2 Hair users lists, we could also recommend that the users look out for that ingredient and recommend products with that ingredient. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/project-avocado

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - With avid travelers in our group, we realized that prices for foods were very different depending on various factors, including location and date. One of our favorite foods including avocados, we decided to focus on avocado prices. Avocado prices have also been increasing due to their health benefits. Therefore, to help farmers decide on a retail price for their products, we have created this program. What it does: - We provide a simple machine learning algorithm that utilizes a random forest regression to predict the price of an avocado-based on various parameters.\nOur parameters are total volume of avocados, # of small avocados, # of medium avocados, # of large avocados, # of avocados per sale, type of avocado (conventional or organic), year of the sale, and region of the sale (selected from one of 52 possible locations in the US). - The retailer can input these numbers into the fields, and then they can see an approximated per unit retail price! How we built it: - The code was mostly adapted from the official sci-kit learn documentation.\nAfter completing the model, we used joblib and flask to create a website to implement our model in a more user-friendly way. We used a YouTube tutorial to help guide us through the steps of implementing flask. Challenges we ran into: - We had two sources of data for our ML algorithm: a more recent, detailed dataset from 2019 to 2021 and an older, less detailed dataset from 2015 to 2018. In order to use both sources, we had to put in the effort and make them compatible. It took some serious Pandas, but we pulled through and managed to make it work! Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are happy that we were able to not only run machine learning tests on our public data but that we were also able to deploy it into a live web app that is user-friendly. What we learned: - We learned how to deploy a live web app on Flask and implement a machine learning algorithm. What's next for Project Avocado: - As first-time participants of hackathons, we all chose to engage in the emerging track, where we could more easily settle into the system of hackathons. We plan to improve upon our experiences by learning more about the different areas of development that we are interested in, working more efficiently in a team environment, and choosing a more challenging track in future hackathons. Although predicting avocado prices may be at an end for this year, but we are excited to improve and create even more useful and creative programs in the years to come. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/yellow-jackeats

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - As students, we have seen both the highs and the lows of on-campus dining halls. Sometimes, going to a dining hall is inconvenient given our academic and work schedule, not to mention super long lines. - We spoke with our peers about some of their dining frustrations. And so, given the ongoing rise in digital gig economy apps like Uber and Doordash, we found a glaring opportunity in an on-campus dining hall delivery service for college students. What it does: - Yellow JackEats is a web app that provides a dynamic marketplace for dining hall food delivery. Our platform enables students to (a) make orders from any dining halls on campus and (b) sign up to deliver meals to others. - Some benefits of Yellow JackEats include... How we built it: - Our web app was written with a Python-Flask backend and a HTML/CSS/JS frontend. We also made use of Bootstrap's minimalistic and dynamic styling frameworks for the frontend. - On the backend, we built our user authentication system using SQLAlchemy where we created a database for all users and orders. Using Python's beautifulsoup library, we scraped data from Tech Dining's Nutrislice webpage which contains live menus. This allowed us to create checbox forms for each on-campus dining hall locations for students to order from. And finally, we used Twilio API to send the customer a notification when a student decides to deliver the customer's meal. Challenges we ran into: - The two biggest challenges that we ran into were in the database for user authentication and scraping Tech Dining's menu website. - With SQLAlchemy, we found that entering in user data was quite straightforward. However, since we were relatively new with SQL, we found it very challenging to create table structures that allowed us to retrieve and update data (since we updated users' accounts every time an order was made). - Additionally, it was quite complicated to scrape the data from the Tech Dining website due to the layout of the menu. The menu was organized by day of the week, so we had to determine the day of the week and filter accordingly. We also had to make sure that students were able to order breakfast items during breakfast time, lunch items during lunchtime, etc. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are proud of how we managed to make our delivery service user-friendly using a very straightforward navigational bar. We are also proud of how our website can handle new users logging in, ordering, and delivering concurrently from multiple devices. This means that our project has the potential to be scaled to a large user base. What we learned: - Given the user authentication, ordering, and delivery capabilities, our web app had many pages. Thus, we spent a lot of time organizing many html pages which began with diagramming mockups. Approaching this web app from diagrams as opposed to immediate coding allowed us to subdivide the app into multiple screen frames. So we learned how to organize complex web file directories and consolidate this on a user-friendly website. - Additionally, we learned a lot about SQL commands which we used to put, access, update, and remove entries from our user and order database. Having completed this project, we definitely feel a lot more confident in our abilities to work with large-scale databases going forwards. What's next for Yellow JackEats: - We are super excited for the future of Yellow JackEats, but there are some additional steps needed before a campus launch. Firstly, we would like to deploy our web app to a hosted domain on Heroku, Netlify, etc. - Additionally, we would like to find a way to connect with BuzzCard technology so that the delivered meal can be appropriately accounted for on the orderer's meal plan. This can be achieved by giving all deliverers a RFID that models the BuzzCard every time they accept on order, or we can create a scannable QR code that enables digital meal plan verification. - Yellow JackEats,\nFulfilling Tech's appetite one delivery at a time :) ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/whatsgood

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We were inspired by the MenuNER paper, which provided a state-of-the-art method for Named Entity Recognition (NER) of menu items in Yelp reviews. What it does: - whatsgood? uses NER of menu items in Yelp reviews to summarize any given restaurant's menu and how people feel about the items on the menu. How we built it: - We had a Firebase and Cloud Run-hosted Python Flask application to build and host the site with. Our data wrangling was done in Google Colab (using SpaCy, Chars2Vec, and Scikit Learn). From those notebooks, we trained our models and migrated them to the backend. We scraped data from Yelp using libraries like requests and bs4, and received other important details from the Yelp API. Challenges we ran into: - Preparing the data we found, especially the Yelp review datasets we used, took extensive amounts of time to process and often failed due to small errors.\nSince Yelp's API only allows 3 reviews to be parsed, we had to scrape the remaining reviews in order to have enough data for generating the menu. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are proud of being able to fully use the power of Yelp's Fusion API, even with the necessity to scrape data from the website due to API limitations, as well as our complete ML pipeline which generates our summarized menus What we learned: - We learned the importance of saving models to avoid reinventing the wheel and redoing tedious training and encoding processes. \nWe also learned that sometimes we have to think beyond the API to succeed in our goals. - Note about demo website:\n As of 8:30am Sunday, we are still publicly displaying the version of the website from Saturday night. We will display the most up-to-date version during our demos. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/carousel-743ny6

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Our team drew inspiration from the fact that many professors and TA's try to organize study groups for their classes, but they are rarely effective. We thought a student-centered, web-app approach to this concept would create more opportunities for students to find and stick with study groups. Also, we noticed the highly competitive academic culture here at Georgia Tech, and believed that this application would thrive. What it does: - Carousel allows users (students) to create an account and specify the courses they are taking. Then, it allows the user to search for a random study group based on course, date, and time, in which the user will be placed with other anonymous students. Carousel provides a study location, and from there, the rest is history. How we built it: - We designed Carousel as a web-application, with python powering the back-end functionality and HTML, CSS, and javascript on the front-end. We delegated tasks throughout the project, switching roles back and forth between front-end/back-end developer, researcher, etc. Challenges we ran into: - We ran into challenges while fetching data from input fields contained in the User Interface, and sending this data to the back-end side of the server. The data types were often complex, such as dates or times, and this accounted for plenty of challenges, especially while converting data between two separate languages. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are proud of a very nice and aesthetically pleasing User Interface, along with the fact that we developed a mostly functioning program in just 36 hours. What we learned: - We learned that a lot more goes into creating a web application from scratch than one would think, and unexpected challenges can present themselves which prove to be the hardest throughout the entire project. What's next for Carousel: - We plan to offer functionality for other categories, not just studying, such as pick-up sports or other recreational activities. Also, we plan to perfect our User Interface, continually test for bugs, and add more features relating to a user's account options and personalization. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/vacpass-awmvgy

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - It has been over a year and a half since the first COVID outbreak in the United States, and chances are we will need to learn to live with the virus for many years to come. Vaccination, without a doubt, is currently the most effective way to combat the virus is through vaccines. We got our inspiration from a privacy law class at Georgia Tech this semester; a great portion of the class focuses on vaccine passports and how to design them to maximize both security and privacy. - The two biggest challenges of vaccine passports are that similar systems tend to be centralized, which greatly lacks privacy, and the lack of transparency also implies less security. In an effort to come up with a solution that is the best of both worlds, we decided to employ blockchains as a way to implement the vaccine passport. Blockchains are inherently more transparent than a centralized system, and it is also extremely challenging to fake records on a blockchain by design. Given that many businesses now require individuals to be vaccinated and that there will be more and more people attempting to fake vaccination records, our product will prove integral to our new way of life by providing a reliable and secure vaccine passport to individuals and businesses. What it does: - VaxPass allows users to seamlessly and securely verify the COVID vaccination status of others. After signing in on an iPhone, each user is given a unique QR code representing their vaccine status. Users can either scan another person's QR code or can display their own QR code to others for verification of vaccination status. One of the most significant and important features of the app is that the only three pieces of information it shares about a user is a true/false value indicating whether the user meets vaccination requirements, the user's name, and the user's birthday (without the year). We do not display information about when the vaccine was received, what brand the vaccine was, how many doses the user has received, etc. because these are ultimately irrelevant to the other party regarding whether this person has been vaccinated or not. This also helps maintain maximum privacy as well as maximum efficiency. Information is stored either on the device or on an Ethereum blockchain after going through encryption.. How we built it: - The group leveraged FirebaseAuth for Authentication and Firebase Firestore for storing user information. Google Cloud Platform powers the backend server, and we use the Python Flask framework for our API. In addition, our blockchain is built with Ethereum Smart Contracts and the Solidity language. The iOS app is written with Swift on the Xcode IDE. The iOS app uses frameworks like UIKit to build components, AVFoundation to scan QR codes, URLSession to make http requests to the backend. We also used Figma to create lo-fi and hi-fi wireframes for the app. Challenges we ran into: - None of us knew much about blockchain technology prior to the hackathon. We first had to determine which technologies to use to implement a blockchain, then decide which frameworks to use for our frontend and backend, implement the full-stack app, and, finally, plug all pieces together within 36 hours. We also had to figure out how to encrypt data that went onto the blockchain. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We're proud that we created a functional blockchain! Despite being quite minimal, the blockchain was implemented entirely by ourselves from scratch, and through that, we were also able to fully understand how it functions. - We're also very proud of the fact that our idea is based on a product that promotes positive social impact. An app like this can potentially provide a privacy-aware solution for millions of people. What we learned: - The hackathon was an enormous learning experience for every single one of us. What we learned included, but is not limited to: What's next for VaxPass: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/safe-alert-9h67sp

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Suicide rates in the US have slowly been on the rise since statistics started being recorded for them. The global pandemic has also exacerbated this mental health issue. Currently, suicide is the 10th leading cause of death in the country. This rank jumps drastically for adolescents and young adults, being the second leading cause of death for ages 10-34. In university environments, it is especially prevalent. It seems we receive messages about students committing suicide multiple times every year. We wanted to tackle this issue and decided to design an autonomous system that would be positioned on the roof of tall buildings to notify authorities and mental health aid if somebody attempts to climb the rails and jump. Although jumping isn’t the leading method of suicide, “jumping from tall buildings or high bridges seems to be reserved for those who are determined to die”. Hopefully, our system will be able to detect jumpers and alert help, potentially saving lives. What it does: - Our system, positioned on the rooftops of tall buildings, has a distance sensor slightly past the railing, which should pick up any activity past the railing, like leaning or reaching. Once the sensor detects activity, the raspberryPi will have the connected camera take a picture. This picture is first run through Google’s Vision API, which detects whether or not there is a person in the image. This will verify that no birds or squirrels or plants trigger the response. If a person is detected, the image is run through OpenPose which uses a series of joint points to determine the position of the person’s body. If the person’s body appears to be in a climbing/unnatural or unrecognizable position, an automated message is played through the speaker, alerting the person that help is on it’s way,discouraging them from continuing their actions, and sending a message to authorities and mental health professionals about the situation. Any of these conditions not being met means nobody is in danger causing everything to run normally, How we built it: - Our main hardware component was a raspberryPi, which we connected to peripheral devices, an ultrasonic sensor and a USB camera. Python was the only language we actively coded in, while using technologies such as OpenPose, AWS SNS, Google Cloud Vision API, and OpenCV. We downloaded ubuntu onto the raspberryPi as our operating system and used it to coordinate between the peripheral devices and connect to AWS and the vision API. Challenges we ran into: - While building our system, we had some problems with our peripherals and with OpenPose. Working with the camera and speaker was tricky. OpenPose works best with high-quality, well-lit pictures and our old cameras were taking either low-quality or poorly-lit pictures which resulted in very inconsistent OpenPose results. We changed our camera to be a slightly higher quality one, which fixed some issues. Getting the raspberryPi to play the audio on the speaker instead of the connected monitor was also challenging. That required downloading an MP3 player. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We’re most proud of what we learned and successfully working with both a camera and open source machine learning algorithms. It was our first time working from source all the way to the end result, while working with unfamiliar hardware. I think we all gained new skills throughout the entire process and are proud of our accomplishments. What we learned: - This was all the team members’ first time working with RaspberryPi, so we had to learn how to set it up and work with it. In addition, we had to research and learn about human body recognition systems like the Google Vision API and the trained convolutional neural network, OpenPose to detect human presence and different parts of the body. We also learned how to use opencv to interact with our camera and manipulate images. Hardware-wise, dealing with the camera-raspberryPi and sensor-raspberryPi interactions was new for us. This was the first time we had worked with a raw camera output and large amounts of image data. Finally, a few of us learned how to code in Python for the first time. (P.S. We also learned vim) What's next for UMatter;: - The next step would be to create communication between the raspberry pi and the client on the front end. When notified, mental health professionals would be able watch a livestream of the camera. This feature would also allow for an on call counselor to help the person considering suicide in real-time. This would be accomplished by allowing the counselor to send data from their microphone to the speaker on the raspberry pi to communicate with the person. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/hospital-management-l7jgq4

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - This project is meant to serve as an equipment distribution management system for hospitals during COVID-19, specifically for personnel protective equipment (PPE). The dashboard allows a user to select a hospital and receive information about its ICU usage. How we built it: - The front-end is a simple react webapp that displays a form for inputting the hospital name.\nWe sourced data from a variety of places- the covid data is from Covid ActNow, but this API requires the fips code for a location to grab county-level data. To match hospitals to fips codes, we coded a Python script to cross-reference a list of hospitals mapped to counties with a list of counties mapped to fips codes, and then sent this data to the ActNow API. Challenges we ran into: - Our original goal was to integrate our project with NCR's catalog and order API in order to help manage PPE distribution, but we were unable to reach this part of development by the time deadline. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Most of our team was new to hackathons, so we enjoyed learning together how to use APIs and how to create webapps. What's next for Hospital Management: - We plan to continue working on this project to flush out the NCR integration, allowing for inventory management by suppliers. This will involve developing a basic catalog of products, implementing transaction data, building out a full backend system, and determining priority level using metrics other than ICU bed capacity. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/techiniq

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Our team leader, Charlie, is an avid ice skater, and he originally came up with our idea because he wanted a way to compare his ice skating jumps to a professional ice skater’s in order to work on his form. What it does: - Techniq takes in two user inputs: an image of the athlete and an image of the professional athlete they want to compare their image to. With the two images, Techniq uses MediaPipe and OpenCV to track the position of the joints and limbs of the user and the professional athlete. Using these coordinates, a graph is created of both images that are then compared to find the differences between them. With every difference between the two poses, advice is given to the user on how they can improve and perfect their form. How we built it: - We built Techniq using Python and the MediaPipe and OpenCV open-source code. The Python code contains several functions that create coordinates for each body part, transform them into a graph, rotate the graph to be in the same orientation, and then compares the differences between the graphs and gives the user advice. The advice was planned to be printed out onto a web page made with HTML and styled with CSS, and subsequently had lots of work put into it, but we ultimately did not have time to implement it. Challenges we ran into: - We ran into several challenges while making Techniq. A very big challenge we faced was our rotation function. This function would rotate the user “skeleton” created from the inputted images so that they are oriented the same way. The matrix math behind the rotations of all the coordinates gave us trouble because we had to rotate in 3 dimensions. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We’re really proud of our standardization functions. Our work on transformation, scaling, and rotation required a heavy amount of advanced linear algebra as well reconstructing skeletons from the ground up, one coordinate at a time. We also figured out how to draw the two skeletons on top of the actual image so the difference between the two is much more clear to the user. What we learned: - We learned a lot about motion tracking and coordinate mapping during this project. All of us got more acquainted with the MediaPipe framework as well as the Flask Python module. Overall, we thoroughly enjoyed HackGT, and we're happy our first in-person hackathon experience was here! What's next for Techniq: - Our next goal is to be able to take in videos of different exercises and movements and be able to track them frame by frame in order to compare them to a video of a professional athlete doing the same movements. Due to the time restraints and our limited knowledge of motion tracking, implementing video motion tracking was something we could not execute. Additionally, our website would soon be put up and hopefully we can transition soon to Android and iOS, which would be the ideal environment for Techniq! ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/bluezone-g8myfv

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We are incredibly saddened by the fact that misinformation around the Covid-19 vaccines remains prevalent, which has caused many unfortunate and unnecessary deaths from unvaccinated patients, as detailed by the Washington Post. Thus for this hackathon, we want to build something that will help reduce Covid-19 misinformation on social media, thus leading to our idea of BlueZone What it does: - Ideally, BlueZone is an dashboard that collects Twitter tweets regarding Covid-19 vaccine and vaccine-related misinformation in the background, and visualizes the prevalence of and vulnerability to Covid-19 vaccine misinformation across the 50 US States. In particular, it will automatically calculate and visualize what particular misinformation topic is currently prevalent for each state and also how vulnerable each state is to misinformation based on their current vaccination rate and vaccine misinformation rate How we built it: - Due to time constraints, we performed all Tweet-gathering via the Twitter API and derivation of key metrics using Python (pandas, tweepy, numpy). To collect tweets on Covid-19 vaccine misinformation, we identify common terms that are extremely likely to be associated with vaccine misinformation (list can be found in Github Link), on top of generic Covid vaccine search terms. After calculating the score of the 4 key metrics (described in the Github Link and video presentation) for each state, we export this data to a csv file, which will then be used for visualization using the d3.js library Challenges we ran into: - One early challenge we found was that not all users self-report their location data (a key criteria for visualization). Furthermore, since user location is self-reported, the location format is highly variable and requires careful parsing to retrieve the state where user resides (or None if the user resides elsewhere). However, the biggest challenge we ran into was that most members of the team had very little practical experience regarding d3.js and other web technologies, which significantly slowed down development time. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are extremely proud of the fact that despite our lack of experience, we managed to finish extracting data and building 4 interactive visualizations for key metrics regarding COVID vaccine misinformation from the 155000 tweets gathered over a period of 24 hours, which we hope will be useful for public health officials to help strategize their outreach efforts against COVID misinformation. What's next for Bluezone: - We hope to turn Bluezone into a full-fledged web dashboard that can be expanded to other areas of medical misinformation. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/mindlastic

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The mental-health crisis is a crisis in the US, with suicide rates increasing, and 46% of the Adult population reporting experiencing symptoms of anxiety or depression. It is one of the few problems that technology has actively contributed to as opposed to remedying. We all have been strongly affected by the mental-health crisis and wish to use technology as a tool in the effort to combat it. What it does: - Mindlastic is an iOS app that is designed to track and elevate your mental health. The app is based around journaling, and uses OpenAI's GPT-3 AI to gain advanced insight on text input, detecting nuanced patters unnoticeable by humans, even ourselves. Each journal entry results in an estimated sentiment value, which is then used to track overall mood and well-being. This data can be combined with sleep and exercise data to provide suggestions to the user to alleviate mental health symptoms. How we built it: - Mindlastic was built with a Swift/SwiftUI frontend and a Python backend using Flask and MongoDB. The app uses artificial intelligence through OpenAI's GPT-3 for classification and summarization of the data. Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for Mindlastic: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/environmental-data-analysis

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We all hail from across the United States, and among us, have seen many different parts of the world. As a result, doing a project centralized on helping society and the environment, through data visualizations, spoke to us, and this is our work on it. What it does: - The first part of this project is focused on looking at ESG (Environmental, Societal, and Governance) metrics for various countries around the globe, while the second part builds a machine learning model predicting revenue based on financial data in conjunction with company-specific ESG scores. How we built it: - We built the project completely in Kaggle, with assistance from various HackGT mentors and Stack Overflow. Challenges we ran into: - Initially, we planned on creating a robot which could play a game enhancing teamwork and communication among kids, using Java and C, however, due to various hardware and software problems, we had to rapidly pivot our idea. As a result, although we had many setbacks, I am very proud of our final product. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - I'm proud of all of us for building this project, especially as it was all of our first times at a hackathon, and so, everything was new to us. We were often pushed to our limits, but we persevered, learned a lot, and created a project that we are all very happy with, and one that we hope you all enjoy as well! What we learned: - We learned various data science and machine learning concepts, and how best to apply them to various contexts. We also learned how to know when things are going wrong, and how to keep pushing without running into a wall and preventing successful progress. Finally, we all grew closer as a team. What's next for Environmental Data Analysis: - We hope to enhance the machine learning model through more specific weights, and potentially changing the base model as well. Furthermore, if we could get more data, and add that to our model, that would greatly help with making sure that the information provided is accurate. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/food-analyzer-mstklp

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - One day, we were eating at Willage, and, being on a diet, we realized that there was no way to identify the number of calories we were consuming! This inspired us to make the food analyzer software to find out the number of calories in our meals. What it does: - The software, which requires a computer and a webcam, enables the user to take a photo of the food item. Then, the software would use the Google Vision API to process the image and identify the name of the food and match it with nutrition facts from the U.S. Department of Agriculture FoodData Central. How we built it: - We used VSCode to write the Python code, and we used GitHub extensions for source control. We imported several modules, such as google-cloud-vision and opencv-python to access functions needed for image processing, database scanning, and UI design. To use Google Vision, we had to get an API Key from Google Cloud. We also downloaded and scanned the database of food and nutrition data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. We built a user interface through PyQt5 that displayed the nutrition data of the food that was captured by the camera. Challenges we ran into: - We originally intended to automatically measure the weight of the food using Arduino and a force-sensing resistor. However, we were unable to obtain the hardware, and thus the weight has to be inputted by the user. We also struggled with setting up the Google API key, and we resolved this issue by following multiple YouTube tutorials. Another challenge we encountered was setting up the connection between the software and the webcam, and this was also resolved by following online tutorials. Ensuring the GitHub source control and Python module installations worked on every computer was a challenge since each computer often returned unique errors. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are proud of making the database search effective, allowing us to accurately identify the food and the corresponding nutrition data from the database. We are also proud of making a easy-to-use, accessible GUI to enable the user to operate the software. We persisted in making sure that everyone's computers were connected to GitHub and had the correct Python modules, which often was a difficult task. What we learned: - We learned how to use Google Vision API, connect the camera to software, scan and parse through large databases, and work on technical projects with new teammates. What's next for Food Analyzer: - We want it to be able to digitally accept weight input from a scale connected via Bluetooth to our software. We look forward to improving the UI and adding customization for the users. We also hope to help the users track their daily intake and diet over time while offering them recommendations. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/restaurant-locator-0zrwhi

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We have experienced trouble finding dining options around campus that meet GT student-specific requirements. What it does: - This program gathers criteria from the users on what they want from the restaurant. It then asks users their location and returns the closest restaurant to them that meets their criteria. How we built it: - We gathered data on Restaurants in a two-mile radius and instantiated restaurant objects for all of them. We then made a comparison algorithm so we could find which restaurants meet the user's criteria. Then we use Python's Google Maps API to convert the user's location description into an actual location with latitude and longitude coordinates and also to find the restaurant's latitudes and longitudes. Then we find the closest restaurant to them that meets the criteria by doing some math with the user's and the restaurants' latitudes and longitudes. Finally, we output the closest one to the user. Challenges we ran into: - Our biggest issue was running a Python file inside a Java file. We ran into multiple IOException and FileException errors. This was also our first time working on a project of this size and on a team like this, so version control and work management were difficult. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The code runs! We are proud of running the Python script to the Java code. We are also quite proud of our ability to debug our code and work as a unified team. What we learned: - We learned to overestimate our abilities and to make more reasonable assessments of the time it takes to do certain tasks. We also learned that we should not learn the technologies we are using during the hackathon. What's next for Restaurant Locator: - We want to sort the restaurants based on proximity and make a list. We would also like to make either a GUI frontend or a website. We also wanted to make a ranking system for the matches that are not 100% and put them under a "related restaurants" tab. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/connect4go

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Pokemon Go What it does: - Sets up Arcade game battle stations where people can find computer simulations of other players to see who is the best Connect4 player on campus How we built it: - ReactJS for the front end and Python/ Flask to manage a backend RESTApi Challenges we ran into: - How do we accurately simulate the decisions of a human player? Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Wrapping a Connect 4 API in Flask to get the optimal moves a player can make at a specific board position What we learned: - Building out a full stack iPhone App What's next for Connect4Go: - Build out more games for the platform so that people are not always just playing connect 4 ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/speechmote

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The four of us were frequent users of Discord and Twitch and wondered how we could bring proper emoji handling to speech-to-text. What it does: - Speechmote allows you to click in a textfield and record audio. The audio is transcribed and then sent as a string to our API which then processes the text through the NLP model. The resulting emoji-fied text is then returned to the frontend and added to the user's clipboard, allowing them to simply paste it into the text area. How we built it: - The Chrome extension is built using Node.js and NPM packages bundled using browserify. The API is run through a Docker image that contains the Python backend with the text tokenizer and NLP emoji model. Challenges we ran into: - The JavaScript packages we were using to record audio actually had some bugs, which made it really hard to reach the exact functionality we wanted. Also, sending an audio file through an API wasn't really working, making it difficult to link our backend to the extension. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Chrome extensions and media streams are at the forefront of browser extensions. JavaScript is severely lacking in browser context support to where it made it nearly impossible for us to get audio streams working in any context except for one of our devices. The fact that we were able to get through this new frontier of technology is a great improvement, especially since our extension is a complicated process. What we learned: - A lot of unforeseen issues arose, but specifically that when cloud deployment is needed be prepared for that. Overall, we improved our Python and JS skills, and learnt a lot about Google Cloud. What's next for Speechmote: - The most important thing to do is fully link the API to the extension. That way we would be able to deploy the extension to the Web Store and have anyone use it. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/visor

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The idea for this project came from the frustration and anxiety of waiting for an advisor to respond to emails about classes to sign up for. What it does: - This project uses data taken from OSCAR and ratemyprofessor.com to generate an optimized list of class registration numbers for classes that have the highest rating, but also don’t conflict time-wise. How we built it: - We made this project by first creating a sample set of data by researching various classes and professors on OSCAR and ratemyprofessor.com. Then we listed out the logic that the average student would use to select classes on paper. Finally we wrote code implementing that logic to make an optimized schedule. Challenges we ran into: - One of the main challenges we ran into was processing the data we researched. Because there are a lot of factors that go into choosing classes, it was very difficult to handle the large amount of data needed to generate an optimized schedule. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The main accomplishment we are proud of is completing a project for our first hackathon. But it is also cool to make something that might come in handy the next time we register for classes. What we learned: - I think the most important thing we learned from this project is how much research goes into making any project. It felt like 70% of this project was researching solutions to problems and 30% was typing out lines of code. What's next for +visor: - If we have time to improve +visor before early November we might be able to use it to find the best classes to sign up for next semester. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/receipts-price-checker

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We are very curious whether there is any relationship between the consumption price at different stores and time points. As students, we always hope that there is a service that can help us find the necessities of life that we often buy and are relatively cheap. This will help us make better use of our limited living expenses. What it does: - It can keep track of purchasing history for price comparison by scanning and recognizing receipts to find the most affordable price of a certain product and display it on the web. How we built it: - We built it with Flask, Jinja2 template, PostgresDB, Azure Form Recognizer, Docker, and AWS. Challenges we ran into: - We ran into several environmental issues when deploying on the AWS. Also, to best synchronize the developing environment between Mac OS and windows, we spent lots of time building up a docker with a database. Moreover, how backend and frontend cooperate to process, store and display the data on the cloud challenged us differently. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are proud of building up the whole tool from scratch in one day. We need to develop the backend and frontend, integrate with third-party API, set up the database and container, and finally deploy the service to the cloud. The completeness of the tool is more than we thought before. What we learned: - This is the first time we have set up services on Azure and AWS, so our technical skills in deploying the system have grown a lot. In addition, when we repeatedly use our system and improve it, we continue to discover how to design services more from users' perspectives and make it more user-friendly. What's next for Receipts Price Tracker: - We hope that our service can be used more widely and help more people. Therefore, the next step is to ensure the scalability of our services on the cloud. We need to ensure that our server can deal with nondeterministic client access efficiently. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/fxma

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We’ve all struggled with time management in our lives. Because of the fast-paced and busy nature of our days, many students barely have the time to sit down and formulate an outline or plan for their week. This is how FXMA emerged in our heads. We wanted to develop a program that would help students plan out their busy schedules and reduce the stress they face in their lives. What it does: - FXMA is a full-stack project that interacts with the Google Calendar API to take in user input and automatically populate the student’s calendar with an optimized study plan. The program allows users to input an assignment name, deadline, estimated amount of time needed to complete the assignment, and whether they want to work on it in blocks. After this, FXMA will allocate time over the next week for the student to work on the assignment. How we built it: - FXMA’s front end was created with HTML and JavaScript, and its back end was developed through Python with Flask. Flask was used to connect the front end with the back end to ensure user input was handled efficiently. FXMA’s back end was integrated with Google Calendar’s API to allow easy viewability for the schedule. Challenges we ran into: - One of the largest challenges we ran into was connecting our back-end and front-end. All of our members had pretty good back-end and functional programming experience; when it came to making a sleek looking front-end, we weren't sure how to accomplish the challenge. We spent more time than we would've preferred figuring out how to pass arguments in from our front-end to back-end using Flask and HTTP requests. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Our team is proud of our full-stack application, and how we managed to accomplish our goals in less than 36 hours. All of our team members had the opportunity to work with a technology or language that they had no previous experience with, and we were all able to deliver a significant contribution to the project. What's next for FXMA: - Currently, FXMA is still ran locally on one's computer. We are moving FXMA to Heroku which will allow users to not have to worry about all the dependencies our back-end requires and the headache of running from command line. Moving FXMA to Heroku will allow users to use our tool non-locally while still maintaining access to their personal Google Calendar. - There's still room for improvement when it comes a proper time allocation algorithm when inputting an event. Static events are going to be called at the beginning of FXMA, so we can be sure not to overwrite a user's current calendar events. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/ingredi-finder

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration:: - Over the years, fast food and eating out have become the norm. As the typical adult becomes busier and the general idea of the nuclear family shifts, individuals are presented with more obstacles with putting a healthy meal on the table. So, our team looked for a way to utilize the boom of sales from grocery delivery and pickup to encourage more home cooking without overwhelming consumers. Product Information:: - We built a functional web application to showcase software that could possibly be used for consumers using an online grocery store. The idea is when a user inputs their grocery list, or from an online grocery store standpoint- when the user adds an item to their online cart, the application provides a list of recipes the user can make using the items in their cart. The list of recipes primarily consists of things they already plan on purchasing and some recipes that only require a few more additional ingredients. This is determined by the machine learning algorithm of Cosine Similarity. The user also has the option to filter out the recommended recipes based on allergies and other dietary restrictions. Tools utilized to build the product:: - We prominently used Jupyter Notebook and Python to write the code, along with Flask to execute the code into a web application. We also used HTML/CSS for the web application functionality. Challenges we ran into:: - Machine learning was not the strongest suit for all team members, so we had trouble getting started with writing the code and implementing a proper machine learning algorithm. We explored a few machine learning algorithms such as clustering but decidedly ended up going with the cosine similarity. We initially used a massive dataset (~200,000 recipes), and the average runtime to deploy our application is ~15 minutes. We decided to cut down our dataset to 10,000 recipes for a feasible runtime (less than a minute). Additionally, integrating the front-end and back-end was also challenging as we ran into several debugging issues with Flask. Accomplishments we’re proud of:: - We are proud of being able to put out a code that functions well despite not everyone in the team having the same background and experience with data science and machine learning. Throughout the coding process, we each contributed and gained knowledge from others’ contributions that will help us with other projects we build in the future. For the future:: - Our team plans to work on the front end heavily. Currently, the code executes, but the web application is not ideal for consumers to use. We plan to use a larger dataset, deploy the code to the cloud, and use the engine to run it. We also plan to add healthier and eco-friendly recipes that support sustainability and add more filters to make the application suitable for more individuals. Additional future direction involves point systems for consumers that try the recipe recommendations. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/shibaceipts

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration:: - As poor college students who carpool and split groceries, we have to manually read receipts, input the items purchased into a table, and calculate how much each of us has to pay. It is very time-consuming and as expected, quite boring. To end this long and tedious process, we decided to stay up all night (twice!) and make a receipt scanner using OCR; it reads, extracts, and saves the grocery items data. Since it's no fun to simply scan receipts, we decided to gamify it! We have hand-drawn generative art in the form of cute Shiba Inus of different rarities that you can collect, thus giving this project the name Shibaceipts. What it does:: - After shopping at your favorite store, you can take a picture of your receipt or upload an old receipt to the Shibaceipt app. The OCR automatically detects, separates, and saves item names, item costs, and the total. This total is then used to generate your very own shibaceipts NFT, out of 6000+ possibilities. This NFT is saved to your Shibaceipt account and can be seen by others and sold. Through the marketplace, you are able to purchase other users' for-sale Shibas. On your account, you should be able to view your past receipts, the items purchased and their costs, and the Shibaceipts you own. The total amount of the receipt influences the rarity of the minted Shiba, with higher spending resulting in rarer traits. How we built it:: - We used a React-Native, Javascript frontend with a Python flask backend. The OCR parsing logic workflow is through Amazon (AWS) Textract. Shibas are generated via the receipt amount and with random weighted traits, and the accessories are combined with the shibas with the help of Pillow. Challenges we ran into:: - We wanted to categorize the data based on the item purchased. For instance, "red gala apple" would be a fruit, "Dove moisturizer" would be a personal hygiene product, and so forth. We intended to generate shibaceipts based on the amount of products of each type created but this is a huge problem being researched for the past few years and is probably not possible to be solved in 36 hours. Accomplishments that we're proud of:: - 6000+ Shibaceipts to collect\nAll of the art is hand-drawn\nUser-friendly, cross-platform application \nQuick and precise OCR What's next for Shibaceipts:: - We plan to introduce custom accessories for receipts that belong to particular stores, allowing for brand integration and sponsorship opportunities. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/cryptlearn

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Understanding blockchain, cryptocurrency and decentralized finance technology can be difficult and overwhelming if you have no technical background. But in order to participate in the emerging cryptoeconomy, you need to understand what you’re getting into. What are the risks, what are the rewards? How does blockchain work? Why does DeFi matter? What opportunities are there in crypto investing for the future? With our web application CryptLearn, we seek to build a better-decentralized world by bringing blockchain and cryptocurrency education to everyone. What it does: - CryptLearn is an educational platform hoping to reach out to end users of all backgrounds and levels that have not yet embarked on their trading journey! :D How we built it: - The front end development of the website was primarily done with Figma, HTML, CSS. The back end development was done using python; libraries including numpy, pandas, matplotlib; frameworks including streamlit (an open-source app framework for Machine Learning and Data Science teams); APIs including the Yahoo Finance and Binance APIs Challenges we ran into: - For the most part, working with virtual environments was mentally taxing, as it required us to try out multiple IDEs to see which one suited us. Additionally, importing APIs and organizing data in a refined manner that's intuitive to the user was not an easy task. We also built a chart that plots bitcoin prices in real time, but we struggled with the integration of that data with the front end. Throughout the two days, we tried to add more functionality to our website including a crypto trading, a stock market simulator, and an intuitive chatbot, which we developed the code for but did not have enough time to implement. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Building the website from scratch and implementing 3 web applications to allow the end user to better understand and analyze the crypto market was no easy feat. Furthermore, providing users with unbiased data and information in regards to the market to provide them an opportunity to learn about cryptocurrencies in theory and deeply analyze/study the markets in real time. This is in order to allow the user to make neutral decisions on stock and crypto trading that wouldn't compromise their financial security. For all those reasons combined, we are very proud of our product. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/wake-4dj7sv

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Each year, roughly 100,000 car accidents can be attributed to driving while tired. As sleep deprived students, we know how severely a lack of sleep can affect focus and concentration. We noticed that accidents due to drowsy driving is a very commonplace yet preventable problem. Our inspiration for Wake was the realization that commercial drivers, like truck drivers, can be especially succeptible to drowsy driving, as they are forced to drive up to 11 hours every day. Wake seeks to ensure that truck drivers do not drive past their limit and take breaks when needed. What it does: - We developed a system to alert commercial drivers when their brain emits alpha wave frequencies, which indicates deep relaxation and closed eyes, and upload the location of the drivers as well as their brain activity to a central website. In doing this, drivers are alerted to stay awake and find nearby resting spots while businesses can keep track of the drivers and their activity. How we built it: - Using an EEG , we recorded brain wave activity and coded a Raspberry Pi 3 to set off a buzzer and LED display when the brainwave frequencies were below 15 hertz (which is the frequency of an alpha wave) and remained at that frequency for 4 or more seconds (which is how long one can look away before increasing the liklihood of a crash). Our web app was built primarily in JavaScript and Python using React and Flask, as well as we used the Mapbox map-building API. Challenges we ran into: - One of the challenges we faced was getting the algorithm to indicate sleep. Due to the noise from the EEG data, the algorithm would consistently show "awake" despite having closed their eyes for more then 4 seconds. We fixed this by adjusting the time delay that indicates sleep as well as the maximum frequency that inidcated alpha waves. By adjusting one of these, we were able to give some "buffer" room that accounted for the noise. \nWe also faced significant challenges with building all of our desired features within our webapp. While we had intended to have real-time brain wave graphs in addition to our map view, this became out of scope due to time constraints. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - On the hardware end, we are extremely proud of the communication between the pi, the EEG, and our alerting system as well as the live data visualization of the brain activity. We're also happy with how clean and interactive our webapp turned out. What we learned: - We learned how to characterize brain waves by their frequency and how the brain waves are able to reflect a person's alertness. We also learned how to transmit information wirelessly using wifi servers (flask), how to call map APIs, and some basic UI/UX. What's next for Wake: - Our next steps are developing a more compact EEG so that drivers can comfortably wear the headset with the mounted alert system on the dashboard of the vehicle. Additionally, we would like to improve our data collection method to reduce noise and have more consistent alpha wave detection. On the software side, we will continue to work on including more informative data analysis so that users can gain more insights from our tech. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/tecbook

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - In college, we often buy textbooks that we no longer need in the future. Whether it be for english class for the countless novels we read, or an algorithms class with a thick textbook that you've never read, we all have textbooks that we don't want, but others may need. One person's trash, another's treasure. What it does: - With this project, users can post textbooks that they have, along with a price they will sell it for. They will also post their phone number. Prospective buyers can find textbooks they would like to buy, and send the seller a text and exchange cash in person via venmo! How we built it: - Tecbook is a relatively robust yet standard webapp featuring a functional component based React frontend, as well as a Django backend. React creates API calls to Django, whether it be to query for existing sellings or to create a new selling. Users can also delete sellings that they listed! Challenges we ran into: - Being a hackathon in a short period of time, there were countless challenges in terms buildability. While using Django itself as a frontend and backend is very common, we wanted to interact React. However, React handles API calls differently than that of vanilla javascript (we can't use Ajax in React, had to use fetch). Being that we had to use fetch, we had to parse in the payload for a function differently than if it were in Javascript. Being that we wanted the webapp to be responsive and easy to use, we don't want the user to be navigating to too many panes or refresh their screen to see new listings when they post/remove a listing. Building an incredibly lightweight, responsive, and intuitive webapp where anyone can post a textbook within seconds was a big challenge we ran into, and one that needed careful planning to get over. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Even though we only had a short period of time developing this, we are proud of using a very professional stack with React and Django. The React and Django code is incredibly clean, with both being very separately coupled. It's very reasonable with the way the code is arranged to have a clear frontend and backend team to develop. Moreover, we are very proud of the styling of the website, as adding CSS makes the website visually pleasing to look at, which is crucial when using any website. We believe that the UI of the website is incredibly sleek, with users being able to post a textbook to sell within seconds, and buyers able to clearly see what textbook a user is selling, the class it's for, as well as the vendor's credentials. What we learned: - In this hackathon, we've learned that some sacrifices had to be made for code quality. It's not reasonable to expect a perfectly developed project, featuring clean APIs and a robust database. Even though we had a Django backend, there actually is no Database (everything is stored in a variable in the backend). While this isn't ideal, it gets the job done for a hackathon and we are proud with the final product we've made. What's next for TecBook: - There are countless improvements to be made for Tecbook. It would be incredible if users could search up for a specific class they want to buy a textbook for, as well as sorting the listings by price. Currently, only people wanting to sell textbooks can make a listing. If users wanted to post that they wanted to buy a book (a buy request, instead of a selling), that would create a 2 way market stream that would make things easy for both parties (people selling and buying books). Next, Tecbook can expand to other colleges, rather than only for Georgia Tech, allowing students from other schools to post their textbooks for their own schools' 'Tecbook' ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/buzzcoin

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We were inspired by NCR's cryptocurrency NCR-100 and how you can participate in events to earn coins. We wanted to bring this idea into the Georgia Tech community and that's how we came up with the idea for BuzzCoin. What it does: - BuzzCoin is a virtual cryptocurrency backed by an original blockchain built from scratch. The blockchain implements methods such as hashing, registering nodes, key generation and allowing for decentralization through a P2P network. Furthermore, in our web-app, users are able to register and log into accounts, view the blockchain, mine transactions for BuzzCoins, and view account information. How we built it: - We built the blockchain from scratch using Python. The blockchain has the necessary methods that allow for all the basic functionalities of a cryptocurrency. Our web-app was built using Flask and HTML. It accurately displays all information, and handles all the methods that we implemented in our blockchain. Challenges we ran into: - Project structure was a major challenge that we ran into as our classes became more complex and interacted heavily with each other. Creating the blockchain from scratch was also no easy feat as even the most rudimentary implementation of a blockchain is fairly complex and time consuming. Finally, combining the blockchain implementation and displaying the necessary information on our web-app proved to be the most difficult challenge we faced. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Creating a blockchain from scratch, building the web-app, and combining both into a cohesive project is what we are most proud of. What we learned: - Through our project, we learned a lot about how modern day cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin utilize blockchain technology and proof of work system to be a valuable store of wealth. Crypto is quickly evolving into a major facet of society, and the knowledge we gained will surely be useful in the near future. Furthermore, learning how to create a functioning web-app is an extremely useful skillset to have. What's next for BuzzCoin: - We hope that we can expand upon BuzzCoin and bring it into the daily lives of Georgia Tech students. Perhaps students will be able to purchase dining hall food, school supplies or even attend school events using BuzzCoins in the near future. The possibilities are endless. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/mealsecure

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We were inspired to create MealSecure to combat the lack of awareness about the inaccessibility of food across the US. What it does: - MealSecure uses data about places with limited access to food to encourage people to support a list of non-profit organizations that work to establish food security for all. How we built it: - We used Pandas to clean/interpret a 2019 USDA database with around 72,000 entries. We used Python, HTML, and CSS. Challenges we ran into: - We struggled with finding this database. At first, we spent a great deal of time researching potential APIs (Google Cloud included). Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We're proud of using Flask to connect our front- and backend. What we learned: - We learned that working without an API is quite difficult. We also learned how to work with GitHub and how to resolve merge conflicts. What's next for MealSecure: - We would like to create a visual representation for the number of people a user's donation would affect so that they can see how much of an impact they can make in their specific communities. We would also like to use APIs to more easily access a greater and more up-to-date pool of data to use. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/touchless-self-checkout-kiosk

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The Covid-19 pandemic brings to light an increasing need for public hygiene and safety measures to control the spread of dangerous diseases. We present a Touchless Self-Checkout Kiosk -- a technology that allows users to perform hand gestures to operate a self checkout kiosk, so that they can touchlessly scan, process, and purchase essentials while minimizing their risk of contracting disease. Other forms of contactless shopping exist, but they often are only available to customers who have smartphones, internet plans, etc. Our solution is unique in that it has little barrier to entry for the user -- anyone can walk in a store and use the Touchless Self-Checkout Kiosk. Thus, we believe that our solution will greatly impact underprivileged communities, which have been hit especially hard by the global pandemic. What it does: - The functionalities are simple. Users can touchlessly scan item barcodes and use intuitive hand gestures to operate a self-checkout kiosk (start scanning, undo item, select payment, ask for assistance). How we built it: - The front-end component is a react native web app that provides all of the user functionalities. The front-end app queries (REST API) the back-end app running locally, which deploys the machine learning models that detect/classify hand gestures and item barcodes. We used an open source machine learning model architecture and weights to implement a state-of-the-art hand gesture recognition algorithm. We used an open source library for vision-based barcode reading. Challenges we ran into: - Sending video/image data from the front-end to the back-end was especially challenging, as react native does not have a good way of collecting frames at the desired FPS for our machine learning model. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The gesture recognition model is a good mix between lightweight and powerful. A lot of effort went into deploying the model in an efficient enough manner for real-time gesture recognition, and the results are very good. What we learned: - We learned that proper team balance and allocation of time is critical for completing demanding projects. What's next for Touchless Self-Checkout Kiosk: - Hopefully we will be able to flesh out more comprehensive features (payment, store catalog) so that the kiosk will be fully functional for general use in any store. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/gum-ai

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We wanted to help change the outcomes of people who are struggling to manage certain aspects of their lives, especially when it comes to disadvantaged communities. Furthermore, we wanted to implement computer vision in a way that was exciting and innovative. Finally, we wanted an app with cute animals in it. So, we thought of gum.AI; a fun way to use computer vision to see the quality of your teeth and get people interested in their dental hygiene, an issue that affects millions of people every day. gum.AI also includes a cute cat mascot, Gumai. Gumai reports your results to you, and celebrates when your teeth look healthy. What it does: - Our app is meant to help its users manage their dental hygiene by allowing them to take a picture of their mouths to get a very basic report back on the quality of their mouth’s health. For this hackathon, we picked a disease--in this case, bulimia--as a proof of concept for detecting specific illnesses. Our app intakes a picture of someone’s mouth and reports whether or not they have bulimia. How we built it: - Our app used Python and TensorFlow with (name of packages) to develop the CV model. We developed our frontend with Figma. Challenges we ran into: - Our project and its scope had to be adjusted numerous times throughout the process. Developing iteratively is obviously not an option during a hackathon, so issues were harder to anticipate and we had to act quickly when we realized we were faced with an insurmountable problem. - We came into a hackathon looking for a crash course in new skills--and we definitely got this--but despite our backend coding expertise, our lack of frontend experience served as a significant roadblock, especially as we were starting out. We began to think we may not even develop a front end. Looking back, it is great we were able to find ways around our issues and still achieve our original goal. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We have achieved a very good accuracy on our computer vision model; it detects bulimia with 99% accuracy. We believe we can do even better with marginally more data. - For the amount of time we had, we are pleased with our front end; we believe it is concise, visually appealing, and lends itself to ease of use. - Gumai is great and we are very pleased to have a cute animal mascot. What we learned: - All team members were exposed to front-end development, which was very new for all of us. We explored many different possibilities for creating a front end for our model, and learned so much about the pros and cons to different frameworks and factors that go into deciding things like whether to make an app or website. Essentially, all of our team members got a crash course in front end development. - Half of our team was new to computer vision, so we got excellent exposure to how CV models work and are trained. Most notably, we observed the powerful impacts that even marginally different training datasets have on the quality of our model. What's next for gum.AI: - gum.AI has proven that it is not just viable, but fairly straightforward to make a basic CV algorithm which checks for the dental health of its users. In the future, instead of just checking for one arbitrary illness, gum.AI can be taught the differences between a whole host of dental ailments and raise red flags to the user in case it sees any issues. Gumai’s purpose is to help people generally maintain their teeth, so it could even potentially also send notification reminders to brush one’s teeth or give suggestions on improving dental care based on the recent images sent in. We believe gum.AI has real potential to help people establish routines and become very dedicated towards maintaining the health of their mouths and teeth. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/tren

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Our inspiration came from our daily lives. Notetaking is a task that has no business being as tedious as it is. \nTren revolutionizes the way students take notes. It promotes collaboration and provides an excellent resource for students so that they can excel in their classes. What it does: - What Tren does is simple on the surface, yet very impactful and thoughtful. Tren provides students a platform to upload their notes and get a unified document that contains the best parts of each student's notes. It also provides students with a post feed for talking about their classes and relieving stress. How we built it: - We decided to build Tren as a web app. We use Flask for our backend and use React for the frontend. Our ML model implements tf-idf for computing similarity between texts. Challenges we ran into: - One challenge that we ran into was that none of us had much web dev experience and hence it slowed us down tremendously. Our future goals include being proficient at web-dev, Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We were able to create a beautiful landing page in the limited time constraints and we were also able to implement TF-IDF for our merging algorithm. Those are the accomplishments we are the most proud of. What we learned: - We learned a lot about web development and NLP. What's next for Tren.: - Tren. is highly scalable. It can be immediately adopted by any college or school without any overhead costs. We envision a future in which students have one less thing to worry about and can have easy and organized access to notes. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/project-p

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: The Future of Patter: - As it is currently, integrates with NCR APIs and has plans to integrate with other providing software in order to make Patter a place where businesses can rely on it as a single source of truth for much of their day-to-day. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/solar-ai

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - As we transition more and more to renewables the most common among customers is solar power. The traditional solar system involves solar panels charging batteries and the home using the batteries for its power. The issue with this is that you lose about 30-40% of efficiency from charging the batteries due to the hardware needed and heat. We wanted to create a way to fix this. Our solution uses machine learning to forecast the power output from the solar panels then we can decide if we want to use the batteries or direct solar power. This will allow for increased efficiency by cutting out the use of batteries. The user can set a threshold based on their needs. - If you were to connect solar to your house without batteries there will be no power at night or during very cloudy days. Why not create a system that knows when to switch between the two sources? What it does: - We predict the output from a solar power system 10 minutes in the future. If this prediction is below a set threshold then the system will switch to battery power. This softens the transition between the two power sources because we know when we want to switch before we have to switch. How we built it: - We got weather and PV output data as well as pictures of the sky using a full sky camera. This camera is very important to the system. It allows us to observe cloud movement and weather. These are factors that impact the output of a solar panel. We did use 4 lag variables to show the regression model what the previous output was. For data gathering, we will be using a raspberry pi and Arduino Mega with sensors to capture our weather data. - hardware specifics Challenges we ran into: - The biggest problem that we had was how big our dataset was. Due to the size of the dataset, we could not load it all into our computers at once. We needed to purge memory space in order to process all of our data. Also, we reduced the size of the images and reduced them to black and white to further assist with this issue. We were unable to use all of the data from the images so we opted to get the first 10 principal components. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are proud that we got an accuracy of 91% for predictions 10 minutes into the future using the image data and weather data. What we learned: - We learned how to deal with large datasets that are not on distributed file systems. Using something like pyspark would have helped greatly with the memory issue. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/4c-mu954f

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Here at 4C, we recognize the amount of concern involved when businesses decide to expand into a retail location. We aid these businesses to determine the best open regions to expand to new locations. What it does: - Our product predicts foot traffic for each candidate location, which serves as a proxy for a successful prospective store location. Therefore by obtaining the foot traffic of different regions, 4C allows companies to foresee which regions would be most successful. How we built it: - We used a Machine Learning based approach to construct a model that takes in nearby competitors, income level of the county, population of the county, and satellite images of the area as the input features. It returns the foot traffic of the location as detailed above. Meanwhile, on the dashboard, companies can scout potential locations via latitude and longitude coordinates. The dashboard recommends certain latitude and longitude coordinates based on the output of the model. - This was powered by NCR's Sites API, which has a Find Nearby request that we used to get nearby locations to the one that a retail business would enter. What's next for 4C: - We would like to improve the features and the accuracy of the model to give companies that use our product even better results. We would also like to aggregate more data so that our model is more accurate. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/cheers-n-m

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The project is Cheers N.M. for every person who have a smartphone to know the live information about a night market event. The key inspiration for this project is from a video on Bilibili which is about a vlogger’s night market experience. I found out that there was currently no queuing time displayed in the night market, though queuing to buy things in the night market was a very common thing. The man in the video had difficulty in choosing, and he hesitated to line up to buy delicious food. My team then decided to build a project to help people who always hesitates to line up waiting for some good stuffs. What it does: - Our projects are presented in the form of web pages. The users will be able to see at a glance which merchant is the most popular. For the users who want to find the line waiting information of a specific merchant, we have an alphabetic list of all the merchants on the left of the webpage. When the users click or move the mouse onto a merchant’s name, it will show the approximate waiting time and the last update time. The most important feature is that we provide a channel for uploading photos, so that users can know the approximate time they need to queue after uploading a picture of the number of people in the queue in front. In this way, it is convenient for users to make better choices about whether to continue queuing. How we built it: - We use Javascript, jQuery, D3, intro.js and AnyChart as our front-end techniques. For the back-end platform, we chose Django to take the responsibility since it’s Python-based. The key technique of transforming a photo to the number of people lining up is computer vision, which uses machine learning to achieve the goal. The neural network that trains the dataset to detect the number of people in a photo is CSRNet (Dilated Convolutional Neural Networks for Understanding the Highly Congested Scenes) from a paper written by Yuhong Li .etc. from UIUC and Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications. We then implemented a simple algorithm to convert the number of people waiting in line to the approximate remaining time for waiting. Challenges we ran into: - The major challenge we encountered was to generate the CSRNet paper’s model to work properly and as precisely as possible for our web. Although we have not made the prediction of the number of people in a image very precisely yet, we should master the technique of using the CSR neural network over time. Plus, due to the limited time, the whole functionalities are only available on web but not on phone. We are confident to implement the unachieved functionalities on smartphones in the future. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We used word cloud in our UI design. What we learned: - Though three of my team are CS majored students and one is ECE majored students. We still had a hard time to convert ideas into NO-BUG code through various methods. We have looked through towns of tutorials. All of us have learnt something brand new. We also learned that we never really realize how much we are capable of doing until we give it a shot. What's next for Cheers N.M.: - Next, we will continue to optimize and perfect our project. Apply all functions to smartphones. At the same time, we will also work hard to improve the accuracy of queuing people identification. If it works well, it may cooperate with the night market organizer. Stay tuned for more features! ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/retail-rewards-bidding

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: How it's made: - We created a RESTful API server using Flask and SQLite. This server keeps track of all of the users in the points economy, creates new auctions as old ones close, and even allows users to add points from QR codes printed on their receipts! This latter functionality is enabled by NCR's Business Services Platform APIs. QR codes can be generated to contain a specific transaction ID, and the server uses the ID to retrieve the transaction's information to calculate how many points to give to the user. Additionally, passwords are encrypted, and sessions are tracked with encrypted JSON Web Tokens. - The client app is created with Android Studio using Retrofit2 as the primary API handling library. UI design is not our strong suit, but that's not a problem. We mostly wanted a usable face to put on top of our Flask API. Challenges we ran into: - A lot of the challenges we encountered stemmed from our general lack of experience with creating and handling APIs and Android apps. We spent a lot of time just figuring out how to synchronize the protocols between the client, server, and database. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/furnitureexp-vr

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - How can one reduce their carbon footprint in furniture shopping, while social distancing, but still get a 'feel' for what furniture they are buying? What it does: - A VR living room that uses 3D models from Wayfair's website to interact with, see pricing info, as well as suggest which furniture items to consider next given current furniture selection. How we built it: - Utilized Unity's engine for creating the VR space, mid-end interfaces with javascript, utilized Jupyter Notebooks for data collection and analysis. Challenges we ran into: - Having models correctly mesh, retrieving 3D models from Wayfair, web scraping congruous data. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Making a working VR platform. What we learned: - It is best to first build with the minimum amount of features needed. What's next for FurnitureExp.VR: - Fleshing out the decision tree suggesting, importing more 3D models. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/payflow

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - A few days ago, a couple of friends and I spent 20 minutes trying to order at a restaurant. Most of the time was spent discussing which order each person would pay. What we ended up doing was having my friend Nabeel pay the whole amount while the rest of us venmo'd him regarding the items that we order. Nabeel had to pay the full $75 dollars for our order just so that we could claim each individual dish we bought. Having gone through this process, we decided to create Payflow that would allow consumers in grocery lines shopping together to split the final bill seen on the cashier. What it does: - Unlike the restaurant experience, pay flow would allow consumers to join a web server containing the items in the cart, select each item according to each consumer, calculate the total cost for each consumer, and most importantly directly pay the merchant through the NCR Orders API. How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for Payflow: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/covid-detection-using-portable-ml

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - It would help a lot if the average person is able to get an indication of their chance of already being infected. This would help them to make the choice of coming out of isolation and taking the risk of going out and getting consulted What it does: - This portable ML code uses Decision Tree algorithm to learn from an existing large COVID dataset, the dependence of the chance of being infected, on 8 fundamental factors. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - This code is a very simple implementation that involves minimum processing overhead and yet is able to indicate the possibility of a being infected with an accuracy of 85%, using just 8 simple questions. What's next for COVID Detection using portable ML: - Next in line is to embed the code into a mobile application so that it is easily available for the average person. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/wishful-thinking

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We found Project Gutenberg and wanted to implement a project that utilized the books found there. What it does: - It takes a user-submitted text file and generates a recommendation from the dataset based on text and style analysis, as well as predict the genre of the file. How we built it: - We used Python to build the back-end algorithms and parsers and Flask to create a front-end UI. Challenges we ran into: - Being our first Hackathon, we ran into many challenges with the organization of our work. Several times we had to rewrite parts of our code to improve speed and reduce errors. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We managed to create a working algorithm that parses a large dataset and converts it into a more manageable vector that could quantitatively measure similarity in books. What we learned: - We learned about machine learning in the form of a Naive Bayes model to make the genre prediction and the challenges behind implementing it. We also learned how to use Flask to build a front-end, and using object-oriented programming aspects of Python. What's next for Wishful Thinking: - Implement a more rigorous recommendation algorithm such as by including sentiment analysis and artificial intelligence to make better, more accurate recommendations. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback: