Datasets:

yiyic

/

devpost_project_py_descriptions

like 0

https://devpost.com/software/a-guide-to-synaesthesia

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Synesthesia \nMusic and visual art touch people everyday. When we listen to musics, we feel the emotion; when we look at visual arts, we feel the emotion. Therefore, is there a way that we can match music with visual art based on our mixed emotions? What it does: - Synesthesia - \nExtract emotion features from music clips; \nExtract emotion features from visual arts;\nMatch them! When you play a music clip, it will display visual arts sharing the similar emotions.\n How we built it: - Music to Emotion: we try to train our own music dataset based on some machine learning models and get vectors.\nVisual Art to Emotion: we try to analyze emotion vectors from visual art analysis.\nMatch: when you play a music clip, we will analyze it and find visual arts sharing the similar emotions. Emotion analysis is based on Russell's Model. Challenges we ran into: - Music to Emotion \nHard to find good dataset. Hard to train and test models.\nMatch \nHard to match vectors. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - It partially works now!!!!! What we learned: - The importance of clear and clean code.\nImprove frontend skills. Basic machine learning skills. What's next for A Guide to Synaesthesia: - Try to complete the whole project. Better ML and better matching. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/irrigation-assistant

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: What it does: - Irrigation assistant help farmer to make smarter irrigating decisions with data. How I built it: Challenges I ran into: Accomplishments that I'm proud of: What I learned: What's next for Irrigation Assistant: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/lifespanner

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Have you ever had a product that broke down in just a few months and had to replace it? You're not alone! - According to EndsEurope, the number of household appliances that had to be replaced within the first 5-years have grown from 7% in 2004 to 13% in 2013—whether this is due to “planned obsolescence” where manufacturers have decreased the lifespan of their product, or due to the better upgrades. Over 2 million tons of waste electrical and electronic items is generated in the UK per year, and recycling and treatment of these materials poses significant health and environmental risks. - Our mission is to inform consumers about the life-span and general ratings of their product based on previous users’ experiences so that they can make the best purchases as they shop online. Through a simple Chrome extension, consumers can go onto major online retailors (Amazon—general, VWR—laboratory), and easily learn how long a product has generally lasted. Additionally, they can inform others of their own experiences of a product. What it does: - Given an online retailer and a product, the extension displays the lifespan of the product. - Analysing Amazon reviews - For now, we only have a very simple, keyword-based method implemented, looking for reviews of the form "worked for X period", "broke after X period" and the like. - The algorithm is as follows: - For each review, - \nExtract review text\nSearch for appropriate terms (e.g. "worked for", "broke after") in the text\nSearch for these time period-defining words in the following 10 words:\n..* Day\n..* Week\n..* Month\n..* Year\nExtract word before the time-period to get the length of time period\nConvert lifespan to months\n How we built it: - Chrome extension with Javascript and website, both connected to Firebase for data storage. Website has also been deployed to Heroku. Review data was analysed offline using Python (Jupyter notebook). Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We built a functional tool in under 10 hours. What we learned: What's next for LifeSpanner: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/multi-sensory-psycho-environmentalism

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Team Members: - David Horstmann\nJames Rhodes\nAnik Roy\nPaul Durbaba Objective: - To create a smart meter that could look at energy data, and provide audio based feedback to allow the user to see how they could improve their energy consumption. What we used: - An Arduino\nA Raspberry Pi\nSpeakers\nSensors\nDjango ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/parent-to-parent-0lm9p3

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Community Heroes What it does: How I built it: Challenges I ran into: Accomplishments that I'm proud of: What I learned: What's next for parent-to-parent: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/prayerbot

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We believe that prayer is powerful and effective. Many of us fail to pray as much as we say we will. Many of us forget to pray for those we've told we'd pray for them. What it does: - This classifier determines whether a string of text is talking about prayer or not. How I built it: - This was built with Python in Jupyter Notebook with the help of pandas, numpy, nltk, scikit-learn, and lots of help from stack overflow and the organizers of the hackathon. Challenges I ran into: - Webscraping various pages with different layouts, tokenizing the string, determining the right classifier to use and how to make it better. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - I'm proud to have learned webscraping and more about natural language processing! What I learned: - I learned a lot about natural language processing and what it takes to see a project come to fruition. What's next for PrayerBot: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/60seconds

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Life is fleeting. Especially as high schoolers, we can easily get caught up in the fast pace of life, often forgetting the small things in life that make or ruin our day and shape us as individuals. Or perhaps the toll of high school or life in general is getting to you, and you can't see the happy things in life anymore. Enter: 60 Seconds. What it does: - 60 Seconds is an iOS and messaging app that calls you daily at 9 PM and asks you to record a 60 second description of what happened that day - essentially an online journal but it's much more proactive. In an iOS app, it allows you to access all past recordings, along with a rating of whether you were happy or not, which it generates using machine learning and sentiment analysis. How we built it: - We built it using Twilio to handle the phone calls and recording the calls and Heroku + Flask to host the backend code on a remote server. We used Python to write the Flask, Heroku and Twilio code and XML to write the files that dictated how the call would go. We also used Firebase to store the locations of the audio files to each specific user. We finally used Swift to write the iOS code. Challenges we ran into: - We ran into many challenges along the way. The Heroku server proved difficult to work with, and we had to be extra careful because we were using a paid Twilio account - we learned this the hard way when we accidentally created a infinite loop and wasted a dollar of our Twilio account money. It was difficult recording and transcribing the audio as well (for the machine learning) because the code would infinite loop often and the docs were not super helpful, and the problems we were having were highly specific. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We're proud of the fact that we managed to implement all the features we wanted to. The recording and transcription happens seamlessly now, and it takes just a few seconds after the end of the recording to create a transcription of the audio to run sentiment analysis on. The sentiment analysis aspect works very well too, with high accuracy and overall the app works as we wanted. What we learned: - We learned how to use XML to control the logic flow of the call we initiated, and we became proficient at using Twilio, Flask, and Heroku to run the backend code. What's next for 60Seconds: - We want to release this as a iOS app and publish it for the world to see. We have registered a .tech domain and plan to market this on the App Store. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/interception

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Interception: - A flood hack project - An educational game/online interactive platform to help inform people about what they should be doing when a flood watch/warning alert is issued in their region. Also, the game/platform will educate them on what to do during and after a flood event. - Visit the demo page ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/hitraffic-alert

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - March 31, 2015 - there was a zipnado on the streets, tell me where were you? You were sitting in your car on your phone, while I was... (Name that tune). How it works: - You share with us your phone number, where you work and live, and we promise to alert you about everything relevant happening on your commute. We're starting with traffic, but we envision this platform to connect you to the events and businesses in your community. Challenges I ran into: - Lack of sleep. Lack of sleep. And uhm. Lack of sleep. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - We learned a lot. We didn't sleep. We ate some pizzas. And we took home a tho... uhm, an alert from the future. What I learned: - We learned to work together as a team and bring a dream to fruition that can benefit all the keiki from across the State. What's next for HI Alert: - We're planning to integrate with more city data to provide a real-time platform for the citizens of Honolulu. We'd love to offer the opportunity for people to connect with the businesses that are important to them. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/coding4changeisawesome

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The given suggested projects. What it does: - Makes job listings and stores it in a database and gives it back with both admin and user page. How we built it: - We worked together making a frontend and backend connecting it with docker. Challenges we ran into: - We had trouble getting docker to work and connecting the frontend and backend. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The way it worked. What we learned: - We learned how to work towards building a full stack web app. What's next for Coding4ChangeIsAwesome!: - Being awesome at coding 4 change. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/piwebcamanpr

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - 'Smart' dashcams What it does: - Proof of concept for a smart dashcam. It takes a photo every few seconds and then uploads it to the Google cloud platform, where my teammates' machine learning code extracts the licence plate and car colour, which is then ran against the DVLA's records to check for discrepancies, allowing stolen vehicles to be identified easily. How I built it: - Generally plug and play and a few open source libraries such as the Google Cloud SDK and the HTTP request library. Also relies on my phone as a hotspot. A bit of SSH involved and a lot of learning how to actually use a Pi Challenges I ran into: - Learning the proper Raspberry Pi toolchain/installing the right dependencies. Learning the basics of SSH and RDP and how to deploy software on a monitorless Pi. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - My first ever Hackathon contribution - and it worked! What I learned: - How to make effective use of a Raspberry Pi, and a basic command of Python, especially useful libraries for interacting with web APIs. What's next for piWebcamANPR: - Perhaps using the stock RasPi camera for better resolution, and an image cache for when the device is offline. This has only been tested on a big smart board with images of cars, and a live test in a real vehicle is definitely necessary to determine things like optimal camera angle and lens zoom. Has a lot of potential for accident detection and providing good data for telemetry insurance policies. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/eyevicii

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - One of our members almost suffered a car accident the night before we began this project. She was driving with her friend and he fell asleep at the wheel. After the car swerved, she quickly woke him up and realized how a device that could prevent this is necessary. What it does: - Our device can read the driver's face and determine if their eyes are open and focused ahead. If the driver falls asleep or takes their eyes off the road for more than 2 seconds, the chosen song will begin to play to alert the driver to pay attention to the road in order to ensure they can get to their destination safely. The total cost for this life-saver device is under 50$ !!! How we built it: - We used Deep Learning (CNN) to give our software the ability to differentiate between open and closed eyes of the user through photos taken on a webcam attached to the Raspberry Pi. The Pi then determines if the user has their pupils fixed on the road and makes sure that they are awake, and, if not, it plays the desired song to wake the driver up. We also provide a web service that allows users to see their sleeping statistics such as their most sleepy time interval and the number of times they've been reminded by the device. By doing so, users will know which time that they should be careful while driving and prevent from encountering any accident. The web service is powered by Node.JS and supports the UI web page that helps users easily interact with their data. Challenges we ran into: - The most significant challenge we faced was detecting the difference between a user blinking compared to actually falling asleep. We also struggled to train the model to view lighter skinned eyelids with dark eyelashes as closed. The software picked up the dark lashes as pupils and read the user as awake so we had to reteach the machine to better identify closed eyes on lighter skinned individuals. The values of neural layers also sometimes result in either over-fitting or a lack of data inputs. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We're proud to have implemented the software to trace and detect pupils; we're also proud to have created a Deep Learning (CNN) model with Tensorflow that has approximately 88% accuracy !! What we learned: - Some of our teammates had never coded in Python before, so this was a great way to introduce them to the language and provide practical applications for using Python with Raspberry Pi. Moreover, the team had more chances to learn about the Machine Learning/Deep Learning/Data Science aspect since we had the opportunity to play with and train the data. In addition, we learned how to implement Computer Vision/Image Recognition with OpenCV and implemented Deep Learning with Tensorflow/Keras. We also challenge ourselves by creating an extra web service with another language (Javascript, HTML/CSS) What's next for eyeVicii: - We plan to market the eyeVicii to car companies to prevent a very common, and avoidable accident -- falling asleep at the wheel. We try to make the device as affordable as possible and improve the quality by training the model with eyes from different ethnicities. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/iothack

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We observed that there are many situations in some busy neighborhoods that involve unfortunate circumstances which require the need for an emergency management team. Our bot solves that issues by providing emergency medical and power care in such situations. Additionally, we also have an attachment to allow it to clean the trash on the streets. What it does: - The main objective of our safety bot is to go towards the neareast neighbor where help is needed. Additional featureas our robot provides is to scowerr the surrouding area for trash and goes gears towards trash and picks them up. How we built it: - We used a car chassis kit that is controlled by a raspberry pi. We built an app using Xcode that integrates google maps api. We 3d printed a servo attachment to scoop the trash into the container above. Challenges we ran into: - Gps module gave us a lot of trouble Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Successfully running the car and making it detect trash using an rgb camera What we learned: What's next for IoTHack: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/choose

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - There isn't one of us that has not at some point gotten annoyed with themselves for spending hour after hour looking for that one item, comparing review against price in order to find the product with the best ratio. We appreciate the hard work people put into finding the best product and as such decided to make it easier for everyone. What it does: - Choose is a web application that can search a variety of sites for different categories of products such as TVs and Headphones, comparing the site's review score to its price. We provide a score and display the items in an easier to compare way, to take the hassle out of searching for that perfect product. How we built it: - A lightweight Flask server was used to host our site, so that we can interface with our Python based price/review identifier. Individual sites were inspected to extract the relevent data.\nWe used some data analysis and looked into clustering the data within the user's price range to allow the user to select whether or not they want to aim to a more expensive product or a cheaper product but due to time constraints have not got past identifying clusters within the Python program. Challenges we ran into: - One of the challenges was collecting product information from a different website, such as Argus, John Lewis. We had to adapt to each website HTML layout to get correct data, and this meant only 3 sites were implemented in the time limit. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We work in an efficient manner sharing all information and communicating with each other. We manage to brainstorm and create our idea into Minimum Valuable Product to test with real customers. What we learned: - Each of us learned new software and developer skills. For example, Lana enjoyed working together with people who she didn't know before. As well Nicole learned to use Flask server to display the data. What's next for Choose: - In the future, we are looking to enhance the website according to created design. As well providing easy access to customers with a mobile app. We aim to add more sites to the product, and provide a more reliable way of rating products, maybe based on number of reviews, similar item clustering based on preference and showing the user what percentage of other users bought items. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/truck-parking-information

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Many trucks have limited maneuverability for navigating rest area parking lots, so it is critical that drivers do not pass the last available spot in search of a better one. If they do, they could end up either parking illegally along the shoulder or exceeding their allowable driving hours. Both situations decrease public safety, and the former can shorten the pavement lifecycle. A trucker who has access to real-time parking occupancy info before driving through the rest area will be able to make better decisions. What it does: - This app will provide information regarding truck parking at Virginia rest areas using the truck parking feeds through VDOT's smart cities data portal. Truck drivers can plan their trips ahead of time when and where to stop depending on the parking availability by a simple click on their smartphones. How I built it: - Using VDOT SmartRoad's Truck Parking feed and OpenStreetMap API (Python) Challenges I ran into: - Building app in 24 hours Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - Occupancy status on individual truck parking spaces. The idea can be easily implemented on commercial parking lots and in shopping mall parking lots. What I learned: - Transportation and data fusion What's next for Truck Parking Information: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/surviving-asteroids

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Use VDOT datasets to provide a spatio-temporal safety metric: What it does:: - Ingests and applies a variety of VDOT data sources to include speed limit, crashes, lane closures, and road work to define a safety metric to be depicted in the UI How we did it.: - Parsed data sets into a fused data set of activity, location, and datetime Challenges:: What we are proud of:: - Determining a very simple fused data model of activity, location, and datetime What's next for Surviving Asteroids:: - Adding additional data sets into the algorithm for determining the safety categorizations. Moving to a more complex categorization than red, yellow, and green to a numeric that can be input into a autonomous vehicle control system. Datasets: - We used the SmarterRoads Quarterly Crash Data ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/pancreas-segmentation

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We were inspired by the number of people that have diabetes due to problems with their pancreas. We created something that could potentially save lives detecting any unusual change in the outline of the pancreas is easier to detect even though it is hard to access. What it does: - The program provides pixel level annotation of the pancreas in order to grant the user with the segmentation using the uploaded image. In other words, the program detects the outline of the pancreas. How I built it: - Using python for running the image through the model in addition to using HTML, JavaScript, CSS, flask framework. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - We, as a team, successfully used flask frameworks and python in our project. What I learned: - We learned more about Python and how to use Flask. What's next for Pancreas Segmentation: - Add a database to store the uploaded images and get the program to compare them in order to detect if there is any variation in the outline of the pancreas that a patient has to be aware of. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/smeltingsimulator-pkrzvg

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - As a team, we share a desire to preserve the ancient knowledge of metallurgy, specifically the process of copper smelting. Through the preservation of this historical livelihood, we aim to educate others on late Chalcolithic Era economy and social structures that were found in the Southern Levant. Together, we hope to foster a religious and scholarly passion for the Middle East and its diverse, ancient peoples. What it does: - Our unique VR simulation engages the user in the ancient process of copper smelting. The user is able to explore a late Chalcolithic Era site known as Khirbat Nuqayb al-Asaymir (specifically Area Z) and is taken through a simple smelting experience in which the player is able to use copper ore and convert into a form of pure copper that can be used for forging various tools, such as large basins that were used for melting sugar (a very important industry in a nearby community). How I built it: - We used multiple virtual reality softwares, such as Unity and Blender, and another image manipulation software, GIMP, to unite 3D and 2D archaeological data to construct a virtual environment that upholds the site's historical accuracy. Challenges I ran into: - We encountered multiple challenges in our early stages of programming, predominantly issues of motion sickness and lack of experience in the coding field. During the later stages of production, we faced problems establishing the minor details of the various artifacts around the site. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - We are particularly proud of the fact that we were able to program a new model that was not previously available to us through a pre-made downloadable package. What I learned: - From the perspective of the archaeologists, we were able to learn more about various coding programs and how to interact with a virtual reality world. Through the perspective of the engineer, we were able to develop an understanding of ancient Jewish cultures. What's next for SmeltingSimulator: - With many high hopes, we would like to inspire others to engage in the world of cyber-archaeology and early Jewish studies. If we encounter a high demand to continue with this project, we would gladly develop this program and further incorporate an complete historically-accurate world in order to incorporate multiple educational features and more diverse user interactions. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/polygon-project

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Minimally Multiplayer; Amazon Web Services; PyGame; Grails How it works: - Sockets, custom packets Challenges I ran into: - sockets, custom packets, python Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - grails3 What I learned: - python What's next for polygon-project: - more of the above ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/blockchain-to-mitigate-deepfakes

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Deepfakes, or AI-generated photos and videos, are proliferating across the internet and are very hard to impossible to detect. Deepfakes typically show public figures doing or saying something they didn't actually say or do, at best creating a PR problem, and at worst influencing elections and destabilizing democracies. What it does: - We know blockchain allows us to track the propagation of crypto-coins on a universal distributed ledger. This same utility can be leveraged to track media (photos and videos) as they propagate around the internet. The positive identification of media from trustworthy sources can allow for better policing of deepfakes. How we built it: - Each media item uploaded by trusted sources can be issued a hash code and registered on the blockchain. This hash code is embedded in the media, and is detectable using a browser extension, resulting in any consumer being able to ask the blockchain who first generated the media. The consumer can then make a decision about whether to trust the media or not. Challenges we ran into: - We'd like to embed the hash codes into the media as a digital watermark, but that proved too unwieldy to accomplish during this hack-a-thon, so for now we've settled for storing the hash code as a metadata alongside the media data. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Handling image data can be really tricky, at first we encountered issues when we updated image metadata and saved the image using one Python package, but then tried to read the edited image with another package. The two packages seem to interpret and store the image data differently, giving us problems for a while. What we learned: - We learned how to create an end-to-end solution for detecting deepfakes on the web. It's a huge problem, and one that requires a strong amount of scale, but we created an MVP capable of searching for embedded metadata critical to identifying whether an image was verified by our blockchain or not, and use blockchain to create an NFT from an image URL. Many of the technologies we used were new to us, but we learned how to be scrappy and build a strong solution in a short amount of time. What's next for Blockchain to mitigate deepfakes: - Work out how to add digital watermarks containing the identifying hash codes into image data that is un-detectable by the human eye, yet robust to attacks.\nCreate a friendly user experience through a browser extension that analyzes images on a website to see if they are verified on pageload. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/torus-protocol-ypa947

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The inspiration to develop a new approach to blockchain technology came from looking at bigger projects in the space already, such as Ethereum and Monero, thinking about their chief strengths of privacy and programmability and realizing a combination of the two is possible. What it does: - The blockchain itself operates very similarly to other programmable blockchains such as Ethereum as far as the fundamentals are concerned. The unique aspect of this protocol is the inclusion of homomorphic encryption which allows parties to interact with each other in a privacy-preserving manner for the first time akin to the cryptocurrency Monero, but also allowing them to later decrypt and verify prior blockchain transactions to reveal them to the world. How we built it: - After we came up with the idea, we first started planning our approach, outlined the jobs that needed to be done, and allocated tasks. We arrived at the conclusion that we had to create a blockchain prototype, presentation slides, that we had to research publicly available data, and that we had to create a UI demo. - Our team had varying experience across a range of tools:\n For prototyping we used Python, JavaScript, CSS, HTML\n For diagramming and charting as seen in the presentation we used AutoDesk, AutoCad, Inventor and LucidChart\n For data analysis we used Python and Minitab\n To compile the video we used Adobe Premiere Challenges we ran into: - The most crucial challenge we ran into was condensing all of the information we had gathered into a presentation that would fit within the time limit. Although we managed to finish just under 2 minutes, it could easily have gone over if we had decided to delve deeper into certain aspects of the protocol. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Aside from the project itself, as a team we're most proud of how well we worked together; everyone was determined and co-operative in delivering the final project we present to you, and we all managed to play to our chief strengths. What we learned: - We learned a variety of things to do with blockchain technologies and the applications of homomorphic encryption and secure multi-party computation. We were further able to realize the limitations that traditional infrastructure such as hospitals, governments, and the like currently have and how blockchain protocols such as ours could be leveraged in a way to deal with these limitations. What's next for torus Protocol: - Ideally, we would like to take the project into it's fully realized form, develop and produce portable hardware wallets and present an entirely functional prototype to parties we believe could benefit the most from the protocol. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/rounce-global-news

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - With the advent of the Internet and the Information Age, it has become important to stay connected with our increasingly globalized world. However, it is difficult to stay on top of current events around the world, as much foreign news is only available in foreign languages. Adequate understanding of foreign material involves manually translating articles and comprehending often mangled text and takes mass time and effort for readers. There is no easy way to tailor one's news feed to accommodate the wealth of information in foreign languages. Therefore, people are left with little information of what is happening around the world. Our solution: - Rounce is an easy-to-use, concise, and informative global news summarizer. Rounce leverages the power of Transformer models with abstractive summarization and translation to perform cross-lingual summarization. Given a specific article URL, it will simultaneously summarize that article and translate it into English, as needed. In just one click, Rounce will quickly display the most relevant information, in English, for the convenience of users. Rounce supports up to 18 languages, including English, Spanish, French, German, Arabic, and Mandarin Chinese. How we built it: - Rounce uses a pipeline-based model, incorporating models from both extractive and abstractive summarization techniques. By using the Edmundson model, an extractive summarization model that ranks all sentences by informativeness, top sentences are then fed to a Transformer-based combined abstractive summarization and translation model. This allows for effective and fast CLS on a variety of target languages and articles. - The entire backend model runs on a Flask app, and the Rounce frontend is displayed using Nuxt.js, incorporating CSS, JS, and HTML. What's next for Rounce: - I would like to expand Rounce by including more features, such as allowing the parsing of RSS or Atom feeds to summarize batch articles at once. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/foodie-s-world-0ylk2x

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - I've always wanted to change what I buy, for example instead of buying fast-foods, I wanted to buy some healthy yet delicious foods. But this isn't so popular as those fast-foods. So, why not make a website where it tries to solve these problems. What it does: - It shows a menu from which you can order some healthy foods. Not only that, you can sign up for some articles that will be sent to you about how you too can make some quick healthy recipes at your home. A game section where you can relax and play games with your friends who you order with. How we built it: - I built it with python, CSS, and HTML. Challenges we ran into: - I was having trouble aligning everything properly in the menu tab and 'my art' section. And some other styling, like using Fa fa icons and aligning them properly on the home page. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - I'm really proud of the whole style of the website, and the idea behind each and every single element in there. I'm also proud of pushing my limits towards CSS. What we learned: - I learned many other complex attributes in CSS. Not only that, I learned how to align images in a menu style. What's next for Foodie's World!: - Next, I would like to add a community chat box, where my users can interact with one another and share their experiences over there. Not only that, I'm planning to make my website a template with advanced details) so that other young high school or college entrepreneurs can use this to kick start their online businesses. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/space-invader-game

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Inspiration: I loved playing games when I was small and by the time I was a freshman in highschool, I decided to major in Computer Science in College and pursue career in it. I have just started coding for 2 years in basic python and C# at school. I always wanted to make a game, which I was able to accomplish this year. Although, my game is not perfect and not too complex, but I am still proud of it and hope to learn about more python commands and instruction that I can carry out in the future to make much better and cooler games. What it does: - What Does it do? I have made a very basic space invaders game in python using the pycharm IDE and some anaconda. The game was entirely made from the pycharm library available in Python. In this game there is a player (User) represented with a rocket and 5 to 6 aliens run by the computer at random positions. The objective of the game is to kill as many aliens with the bullets from your rocket as possible before, the aliens come near you and eventually touvh your rocket. If that happens the game is over and the final score is displayed. How we built it: - I built this game alone within 2 days. I saw some tutorials n youtube and then used pycharm with the pygame library to build it. The code, graphics, keys etc were all decided and made by me at home on my personal laptop. It was a difficult task for a first time maker, but it turned to be pretty good and I am very proud of it. Challenges we ran into: - I ran into a few challenges. The first was detecting collision between the bullet and the alien and between the alien and the rocket. Eventually I fixed them. The next problem was updating the screen after every event. This was also fixed by a single line of code. The last problem was switching to a different screen when the game was over. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - I am just very proud to be able to make this game! This will be the stepping stone to something bigger in the future. I am also proud that my game works and my hard work paid off. It is also an achievement for me to be able to create this game alone without anyone's help. What we learned: - I learnt that nothing is impossible. At first I felt, creating a game is not my cup of tea but eventually with dedication and perseverance I was able to complete my first hackathon project. I also learnt to deal with problems easily on python. What's next for Space Invader Game: - Space Invaders is still an unfinished game which can evolve easily to be become a better and more fun game. I will work onto updating the game to make difficulty changes, custom changes, and displaying game data from past matches. This game is a very good start for beginners like me ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/canada-uni

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - After seeing the COVID situation in Canada, we felt the need to find a solution to help Canada overcome the pandemic as quickly as possible. What it does: - It allows users to find the closest vaccination sites, and to book appointments to go, without the need to wait at hospitals. How we built it: - Using bubble, we developed the demo, but we also produced a section of the codes that could be used in the actual app. Challenges we ran into: - Building the code was a challenge, but we put as much effort as we could into developing a code that functions. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Despite our limited experience with python, we were able to produce a code that worked to show parts of our demo. What we learned: - For most of our teammates, being first years, we had no prior experience with python. Thanks to the workshops, we got an opportunity to enhance our skill sets and tried to implement it in our project. Additionally, we learnt the importance of teamwork and communication as these were the core elements that were essential when designing our solution. What's next for Canada uni: - The goal of Canada uni is to help Canada overcome the pandemic. If we are able to do so successfully, Canada uni will be prepared to face any other outbreaks to come. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/forecast-lxdvgm

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - This project is motivated by the largest issue with social distancing: people. Currently, there is no good way to tell how many people are at a location, and without that information, people can't make informed decisions on when or where they should go out. What it does: - The solution is two-front. We have an API hosted on AWS that uses a web scrapper to locate current location data on Google maps. This is fed into our website that displays the information in a clean and minimal format. How we built it: - We built the web scrapper in Python and JavaScript, and we built the website in Javascript, HTML, and CSS using the React library and Material-ui framework. Challenges we ran into: - The main challenge we ran into was allowing the hosting API to be called from the website. As the website is hosted locally right now, we don't have CORS policy compliance, and so the requests have to be passed through a proxy server to allow the API calls to go through. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are proud of our solution to the problem, and we are proud that the website works at all. What we learned: - We learned a lot about web development, the challenges involved, and the process of solving the related problems. We also learned about the API pricing, marketing techniques, and financial outlook of our endeavour. Probably the most important part though is that we learned a lot about topics we're all unfamiliar with. What's next for Forecast: - Ideally, we would implement the features proposed in our video. Adding further support for browser extensions, mobile applications, user profiles, and more would definitely add more functionality and appeal to the website. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/trackathon-l1afjm

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Our inspiration for this idea was to see our campus again. It's almost been one year since we've been at our campus, So we tried to come up with a way to reduce the number of large gatherings which can effectively reduce the number of COVID cases. What it does: - Our software analyzes the data that is stored in our personal database. Our database stores IP address, facility, home address, location, and phone number for each person. This information is hoped to be collected from the companies we will attempt to partner with such as Apple. After receiving an individual's information from the database our software looks at the facility, IP address, and location of the individual to determine if the individual is following COVID restrictions. How we built it: - Using a database(hard coded for now) from Firebase we made a python algorithm that checks where a specific amount of people are being gathered. The algorithm can tell the difference between an actual illegal social gathering and if it's just people in a store or different floors of a building. Then we display the hotspot locations and all the individuals in those locations with their information using Tkinter GUI. Challenges we ran into: - Making the software by learning how to work with Firebase and Python GUI was very challenging since we are very new to it. Getting the algorithm to work and display the right locations and people on the GUI was very challenging. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are proud of getting the algorithm to work as it is our first time working with a database. Working with the database was all self-taught and a fun experience overall. What we learned: - We learned alot from this Hack The Case such as working with databases, Tkinter. We also adapted a business mindset since we are CS students we didn't know much about the business side. We learned to come up with an innovative idea and make a prototype which could be applicable in the real world. What's next for Trackathon: - We will use the prize money to invest in the software. We will hire a development team to make the software more efficient. We will also try to form partnerships with Apple, Facebook, Rogers and Bell. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/team-apollo-solution

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration ## Headline South Koreas Effective Covid response system through utilizing many usages in one application!: What it does ## Headline Contact Tracing, Information provision, Vaccine Tracing and Mental Health Assistance: How we built it ## Headline Innovation when looking into new technology and proper Teamwork and collaboration: Challenges we ran into ## Headline Tackling privacy on a tracing app was difficult but through innovation we were able to mitigate it.: Accomplishments that we're proud of ## Headline Getting innovative and learning new forms of expression of data through code!: What we learned ## Headline Team work and interaction was a huge benefit and we learned to utilize the strengths of each competitor: What's next for Team Apollo Solution ## Headline Another case comp hopefully!: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/star-65cbx1

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - To provide useful solutions we first needed to understand the issues at hand. That mindset drove our team to explore how the status of businesses across Greater Montreal has affected the needs of the citizens that request Centraide's services. Along with the coaching of AI experts gathered at the 2020 Hackathon, we propose a solution to predict future impact of bankruptcy of for-profit and non-for-profits businesses. What it does: - We visualized an external dataset related to business closures in Montreal (Montreal Open Datasets - J'informe les commerçants) using Data Studio as well as used a time series to explore the needs of Montreal citizens. - \nWe have created a tree based model for predicting status of Montreal businesses based on Montreal questionnaire dataset.\nThe second model aims to predict the number of calls made any day by the hour based on the need category e.g if you choose now as the day and time, the model will predict how many calls you can receive in that hour for each category. This will enable you to efficiently scheduled the number of people you need every hour to attend to a particular need category.\n How we built it: - Model 1 - We have built the first model using XGBoost algorithm in python.\nProcess: - Model 2 - We built it using scikit-learn's Randomforest Algorithm.Numeric features were scaled using StandardScaler while categorical features were encoded using one-hot encoding. We build a complete pipeline that takes the raw data, process it and make predictions. Challenges we ran into: - A consensus of the main direction we wanted to take this project was a huge undertaking.\nLanguage barriers to understand the data, conflicts of interests and asynchronous communication were all factors that reduced our collaborative drive.\nHowever, through the help of mentors such as Olivier Foster, Nithum Thain, Mathieu Chaurette as well as more in-depth exploration of external open datasets available, we were able to resolve our struggles.\nAlso a lot of time was spend looking for good datasets. We have looked at housing prices datasets, criminal/justice datasets, business closure etc. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Provided visualizations and a tool that members of Centraide and other organizations for social good can use to improve their services and be more informed about how they can prepare themselves to support their communities. - We produced working model to predict the status of business statuses. What we learned: - Working on this hackathon had plenty of challenges.\nOne of the main issue was this is held online and there was less in person communication. As a result of this sometimes we lacked the direction. \nIn the end we were able to come together and answer some of the key questions and produce a working model. What's next for Team Star & Exploring the Impact of Covid19 in Montreal?: - We look forward to the next hackathon! ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/ai4gooders

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: AI4Gooders: - The project is based on using data indicators to create an accurate and weighed scoring structure that will assist in providing a strategic placement system for predictions of risk assessment areas for certain categories. Our system will compile key-environmental datasets such as Covid-19 number of cases in the area, the income of the population in the area, age and gender of 211 callers, etc. The information is used to create a system that prioritizes sub-categories of people in sub-areas that have a higher need for emergency help, in order to improve the local life. The scoring system acts as a visualized map for users to compare each part. Each individual dataset or factor will have an effect on the overall score of a location and will represent which site has a greater demand for life quality improvement. Inspiration: - We are simply looking for learning opportunities and fun, while dedicating some brain cycles to helping out Centraide. The Covid-19 is currently a global issue that needs any help it can get. Obviously, there are issues for people who need help that increase the dangers of the pandemic for them. These issues would be related to gender, age, newcomers, low-income, etc. Everything adds up, and we believe that even one person can make an impactful difference, just like how our project may be able to make a difference. Using that logic, we thought about how we could potentially help our local community first. We developed a system that uses key centraide datasets to help identify geographical locations that include people under higher risks due to the pandemic, or weather challenges for new immigrants, to boost the quality of life. Through centraide’s data analysis, it can essentially generate a report that will be converted into a scoring system that can help users visualize where helping people would have the greatest positive impact on the local area. Significance: - This is important because strategically placing new helpers based upon needs of people rather than geographical purpose has the potential to help local life, which can grow to a larger scale and have a beneficial impact on the global health. What it does: - The system uses python to retrieve Covid-19 data and 211 Calls by Week data, longitude, and latitude of organizations specified by the area. We have looked at this hackaton from 3 different angles: - \nWe implemented some visualizations about the evolution of the number of declared cases of Covid by borrow through time\nWe tried to characterize the profiles of callers to the 211 with some unsupervised clustering algorithms. Our clusters show the frequency of callers in each gender, and their age range. This informs us to predict the future calls to identify under-need people are from which category. \nWe trained a model to recommend which agencies each caller should be referred to based on their profile and their needs.\n How we built it: - Our first target was to find relevant datasets provided by the organizers, specifically, important centraid data. After finding the necessary datasets, we set our minds to being able to understand what information we want to use from them and how we would go about using it. We used a collection of Python, Mapbox API, Python Pandas, and Numpy, Plotly, and Sklearn libraries, Google Colaboratory notebooks in python. At the top of the page is a visualization of our work. Challenges we ran into: - Our main problem that we faced was the constraint of time. We have big plans, however it is difficult to integrate everything into the final product because that takes a significantly longer amount of time. In terms of victories, we were able to fully incorporate key datasets into the our system. All that data would come together to show the points system. Also, we could not find polygons for the municipalities in greater Montreal that are not on Montreal island. We wanted to combine the two visualizations on Covid19 cases and 211 calls together that proved to be tricky. We also wanted to explore graph databases to visualize the relations between callers and their needs. Accomplishments that we are proud of: - We discovered a flaw in the 211 datasets with the taxonomy codes no one else had noticed. (It will be corrected). What we learned: - During this hackathon, we learned how to split the problem into smaller sub-problems to have a better understanding of each part of it. This helps us to tackle the main problem from different perspectives as a group which enables us coming up with a better and more comprehensive solution. We got better at manipulating datasets with pandas. What's next for ai4gooders: - The next steps toward our main goal--helping society and Centraide for a better life-- we will continue using more related data from other agencies to be able to cover more areas with helpers. By identifying problems that each category of people who need help are struggling with, we would be able to provide specific need that they need. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/surrayhacks

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Students like us who are human and keep forgetting the documents at home. What it does: - First of all, you need to make an account then you just upload your ID(we are checking the authentication of that based on the data you are providing using google cloud) and using OpenCV it will extract information from your documents(For example your id card) and make your useful information handy. How we built it: - We build it using HTML, css, js, Gcp and python. Challenges we ran into: - Many but we nailed all of it. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We implemented complicated things like document upload, authentication from a database stored in google cloud, data extraction etc within 24 hours of sleepless hard work. What we learned: - Teamwork, Management of time and how to learn things rapidly. What's next for Surrayhacks: - Extension of this as an android application. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/vaccination-volunteers

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We noticed that old folks we knew were having trouble figuring out if they were eligible for the COVID-19 vaccine, and even then had to navigate a complicated registration process online. Furthermore, most resources for determining eligibility and signing up are only in English, a further challenge to people who can't speak or read English. Therefore, we decided to create a streamlined process to address all of these challenges. What it does: - Our solution has two main components. The first is a robust reminder apparatus which pulls data on each state's vaccine eligibility criteria and generates a robocall to be sent out to everyone on our calling list in that state. - The second aspect of our solution is a website and training program where volunteers can sign up to help old folks navigate the vaccination process. After signing up, the volunteers are assigned several states they must learn the registration process of before receiving calls. How we built it: - Robocalls - The robocalls were generated by a python script that scraped data from the New York Times’ page with current vaccination requirements before creating an automated message for each state in English and Spanish. We used dialmycalls.com to send out robocalls because they offered a free trial. The service successfully sent batches of state-specific robocalls to phone numbers in our database of the same state. - Website - The website was made using Bootstrap Studio. The website is three pages: “home”, “about us”, and the sample training page “module.” There is also a sign up feature on every page that leads to a GoogleForms. It also includes the motivation for VaccinationVolunteers. - Phone Number Database - The results from the Google Forms CSV populated with the information from the volunteers’ responses were then loaded into a MySQL database table. Each response on the Google Form corresponds to a field in the MySQL database table. The table was then sorted by states to provide information on how many volunteers are currently available per state and it also corresponds to the specific training module that the volunteers receive based on state. - Volunteer Form & Assignment - After the volunteer fills out the google form, they are automatically sent an email with a link to the training module and an email stating which state they are assigned to. The state assignment was created by python. The script would take the .csv file from the google form and create an array that appended all the states where the volunteers stated they currently live. Ideally, we would want to assign someone to their own state. However, we also wanted to make sure that every state had enough volunteers. To ensure this, we assigned several brackets that consisted of states within their own region (Northeast, TriState, EastNorthCentral, etc). The program would calculate the state in each bracket with the least amount of volunteers and assign the volunteer to that state. After the assigned state was calculated, the code implemented yagmail to send an email automatically to the volunteer with their state. What's next for Vaccination Volunteers: - Next, we hope to work with local governments to bolster their COVID-19 vaccination effort. We hope to facilitate this by accessing the large databases of phone numbers that local governments use to distribute similar information during emergencies. Simultaneously, we will develop training modules for every state’s registration process and grow our volunteer base to fit every language. We also have created a Firebase google sign in and we hope to use this so that volunteers can sign in to their account and change their time slot if they wish. Finally, we hope to set up a routed 1-800 helpline for people to call if they want to speak with a volunteer. While this feature was cost-prohibitive during the hackathon, it is critical for effective service. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/summarizr

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We interact with tremendous amounts of information on a daily basis. Thoroughly understanding all of the information that we are presented with, however, is a time-consuming and challenging task. In particular, as students at Columbia, we are often required to read long excepts from works of literature, to sift through lengthy lecture slides, or to digest verbose textbook passages. \nTo lighten our busy schedules from our required readings, we were inspired to develop an automated means of text summarization. What it does: - We developed a free-to-use machine learning-based means of summarizing text that is hosted on a web app ( and as a chrome extension. Specifically, given a user text input (either typed in, uploaded as a pdf, or via our extension), our unsupervised algorithm extracts the most important sentences from the input based on a similarity metric (cosine similarity), and returns these important sentences back to the user. The user can also customize the number of summary sentences that they want returned to them. How we built it: - We developed the extractive summarizer through the natural language toolkit (NLTK) package and the networkx package in python. The web application was developed using the Flask web-framework library in Python, and styled using vanilla JS and CSS. The extension was made using pure HTML, CSS, and HS. - Although it was not implemented in the web app or extension, we also developed an abstractive summarizer using stacked LSTMs with a custom attention layer using Tensorflow. Unfortunately, the model size was too large to be hosted on pythonanywhere for free. Challenges we ran into / What we learned: - Since we were completely new to developing chrome extensions, we had to learn the project formatting and javascript functionality that's exclusive to how chrome builds their extension applications. Additionally, since we wanted utilize the same back-end as the web application, we had to make use of Cross Origin Resource Sharing for the first time while also finding an effective means of transferring website data to a text format that the model could use. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We successfully developed a text summarization web application and our first chrome extension. What's next for Summarizr: - We plan on improving the user interface into a single-page application by using React.js. In addition, we plan on developed a more lightweight abstractive summarization model that can be implemented in the website. For the chrome extension, we aim to build a more robust system for extracting relevant text and avoid feeding the model text from links, headers, widgets, etc. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/see-covid

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Walking around NYC, you really want to know how badly hit your neighborhood and the surrounding areas are by covid-19, so that you could avoid highly-infected areas and be aware of upticks. What it does: - Our app uses AR to show you live covid stats superimposed on your camera view, updates the data automatically, and shows you the stats of all the neighboring zip codes, anywhere in the city of New York How we built it: - Using A-Frame, a web AR/VR framework that allows you to write HTML like syntax for 3-d environments, integrated that with device API's including geolocation, motion & device orientation, and camera. We aggregated data from the city of New York and built an algorithm that superimposes this on the zipcode you're currently in and for the surrounding zip codes, displayed by where you are pointing your phone. Challenges we ran into: - We've never done AR before; had to learn from scratch. The dev environment took really long to develop. It was hard to find good city data; most publicly available data is on the county level, but we wanted lower level data for more location specificity Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Mastering AR and integrating live covid data with zip-code, and getting auto-updating the covid data What we learned: - How to use AR, automatically refresh data from github, query and arrange zip-code coordinates, latitude and longitude, running this all out of herokuapp. What's next for See Covid: - We want to add functionality to find the nearest testing sites, hospitals, and extend it to zip codes across the country. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/hackuno

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - In the midwest, oftentimes academic institutions make controversial decisions regarding whether or not to cancel school due to inclement weather. The nature of this decision is overly subjective, which inspired us to create a systematic, reliable method of determining whether or not school should be cancelled. What it does: - Whether the Weather is a software that we developed to determine whether the weather is severe enough that school should be cancelled. To do this, we analyzed historical weather data along with vehicle crash data from Des Moines, IO ranging from 2008 to 2018 to derive the severity of the road conditions during certain weather conditions. How we built it: - Much of our effort was put into ingesting the data. We found one source with historical weather data from Des Moines, and another source with vehicle crash history over the same time period. We narrowed the crash dataset based upon when poor weather conditions were evident, as well as a few more features. We merged this result with our weather dataset, and fed them to our Artificial Neural Network, which we used to predict several values based upon the weather conditions of each vehicle crash regarding the severity. For our neural network, we used the Tensor Flow library, and to parse the data we used Node js. We also used React and Js to create a front-end web application prompting the user to enter a city upon which the application predicts how many vehicle crashes there will be depending on weather data, and gives a recommendation on whether to cancel school. Challenges we ran into: - Finding and merging the dataset was a time-consuming part of our process because it was difficult to find weather and vehicle crash data that included hourly data. The hourly data was essential to give accurate predictions on how many crashes there would be. Preprocessing the data and applying the neural network to is also proved to be difficult. We spent quite a bit of time tweaking and repairing our network, because the model wasn’t converging nicely. Team Contributions: - During the entire process, we were in neat constant discussion. Many of the technologies and steps that we used for our project were new to us, so we tackled our project by pair-programming to make sure everybody got decent exposure and experience with the topics. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/weather-sentiments

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Natural language processing is one of the most rapidly evolving fields in computing today. Small talk about the weather is one of the most mundane things a person does each day. What can we learn about people's moods from analyzing online weather conversations? What it does: - Essentially, WS connects daily weather data with data about the aggregate sentiment of weather tweets for that day. Using regression analysis, the app attempts to find patterns in how people talk about the weather and what the weather pattern is. It also attempts to make predictions about how people will feel about possible future weather scenarios. How I built it: - Through a lot of research, I found the Twitter developer API, the NOAA daily weather data, Tweepy python library, and Textblob python library for sentiment analysis. Challenges I ran into: - It was difficult to find daily weather data over many days from a commercial vendor (most supply only the last few days), but eventually I was able to turn to the federal government for good data. However, the Twitter API only lets free users go back one week, so I ended up with far less data than is really necessary for a machine learning project. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - I arrived at HackUNO deciding to do something with machine learning, but I didn't really have an idea of what that meant. Over the course of the 24 hours, I worked with many new tools I had just learned about, I learned about data science methods and practices, and got to start something really cool. What I learned: - It's always best to plan the project ahead of time. One of the main reasons for this is that challenges will come up, and your project can be significantly handicapped halfway through in a way that may have been foreseeable. That being said, it's difficult to really do anything new in 24 hours, because there is so much you can't really plan for. What's next for Weather Sentiments: - Unfortunately, probably nothing due to the lack of Twitter data available for my purposes. However, I will definitely be using the concepts and tools that I worked with again. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/perspectives-p5fa0t

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Following the presidential elections in a very politically polarized era, we wanted to address some of the difficulties that we faced in finding a good balance of political news sources. What it does: - Using deep learning, this extension helps you understand the political bias (left, right, neutral) of news articles you are reading. It then encourages you to explore articles of opposing perspectives, which were identified using natural language processing. How we built it: - The Chrome extension extracts the URL and contents of the current news article and sends a get request to a Flask server running on Python. The server analyzes this request and forwards it to a bidirectional LSTM neural network that returns the bias score on a spectrum. The backend script also analyzes the article using natural language processing and scrapes articles with different opinions on the same story. Challenges we ran into: - Text is a messy data format to deal with. As a result, a large portion of our time was spent parsing through inconsistencies in the data and formatting everything consistently. Also, it took several iterations of hyperparameter tuning in order for the model to achieve the level of accuracy that we reported. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - This was our first time working together and we are happy that we managed to pack a large number of sophisticated functionalities into a project with large real-world applications. What we learned: - Working with language models can often be quite challenging due to the erratic nature in the text data and their meanings. We learned to focus on streamlined processing techniques to minimize the amount of unwanted variability in our results. What's next for Perspectives: - Continued hyperparameter experimentation will lead to higher classification accuracy of articles. Integration of cloud-based platforms will allow for larger requests. Eventually, Perspectives could be introduced to the Google Chrome Store for public use. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/hackberrypi

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Components: Resources: - ADC - Temp ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/dorm-doorman

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Imagine you walk out of the shower, you walk to your door and GASP, you've forgotten your room key. Now you're stranded with no way to get into the safety of your room. You can either pound on the door, hoping against hope that your roommate is in the room and can open the door your you, or you can seek refuge in a neighbors room, or take the brave run to the RA's room. Dorm Doorman is the solution. It uses facial recognition to see who's at the door, and if it's a stranded Freshman just trying to get into the room it unlocks the door. What it does: - Dorm Doorman opens your dorm room door so when you're locked out, you can still get into your room How we built it: - We used a Haar Classifier implemented in OpenCV to detect faces in a camera stream from a webcam. Then we use another Haar Classifier to check the detected faces against a list of approved faces and if the face in the image is approved then it unlocks the door. If the face isn't allowed to open the door, then the nerf gun shoot the unauthorized person. Challenges we ran into: - We had a lot of trouble getting the Mac and Arduino to talk to each other over Serial. We also had a lot of trouble getting OpenCV to build properly and training the Haar classifier properly Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The Haar Classifier works very well to detect the approved faces. What we learned: - To have your libraries compiled ahead of time and to always be focused on full system integration. What's next for dorm doorman: - We want to add more faces to the approved list, so our roommates can get in as well. We'd also like to make a system to temporary give other faces permission to access our room, in case we want to let one of our friends in. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/bone-age-classifier

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - When I (Vinay) was 16, I had just made the Under-16 Malaysian national cricket team for the Under-16 Asian Championships. As part of the registration process, I had to undergo a bone age test to verify my age--because parents in countries like Afghanistan, Iran, Nepal, etc. don't have to register their children at birth, meaning ages could be easily falsified to allow older players to play age-group tournaments--which I ended up failing as the doctor classified me as a 17-year-old. The test involves an x-ray of patients' hands and then a doctor would look at it, measure the length of specific points on the x-ray, and then decide how old the patient is. However, this process is highly subjective and doctors can have differing opinions. Back to my story, after I failed the first test, my manager took my x-ray to another doctor who then said I was a 16-year-old, which allowed me to participate in the tournament. The goal of this application is to create a more accurate and consistent means of classifying bone ages, so that eligible athletes are not excluded and ineligible athletes are not included in major international youth athletic events. What it does: - Our application takes in an x-ray image, runs a trained machine learning classifier, and outputs the predicted age of the individual with a confidence level. How we built it: - We acquired training data of around 20,000 x-ray images from Kaggle, which was then filtered and categorized into groups of 13-18 year-olds (our focus group) using Python. These images were then fed into a machine learning classifier on IBM Watson's Visual Recognition service as our training data, also using Python. The rest of our application (web application) is built using Angular, Node, and Express, which interacts with our Python script that runs the API calls to Watson with new images and returns a JSON object back to our Javascript framework that parses the data and displays it to the user. Challenges we ran into: - First, we had an issue training the machine learning model with the 20,000 images as IBM Watson has a limit for its free version. We had to compromise on some accuracy by cutting down our training data down to around 1000 images just for the sake of this hackathon.\nNext, connecting the Python script to our Javascript framework is something none of us have done before, and ultimately, this served as our biggest stumbling block. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are proud that we were able to hack up a solution to a real-world problem as opposed to solving a problem nobody knew they had. What we learned: - We learned that solving a real-world problem can be done by anyone with a computer. In addition to that, we learned to effectively work as team by communicating well, encouraging each other, and not giving up when faced with time crunches and failing code. What's next for Bone Age Classifier: - First, we would like to spend some time to create a more accurate machine learning model which is a project in itself. Right now, we had to minimize our training data and exclude meaningful metadata (age) to allow us to utilize the IBM Watson service. This has definitely compromised on accuracy which we found to be acceptable for the sake of this hackathon. In addition to that, we would like to utilize regression models instead of classifiers which could provide us with more accurate results. Next, as a more optimistic plan, we would like to expand our focus group from 13-18 year-olds to include younger children and to add more metadata (medical abnormalities) which would allow the application to be used to identify growth abnormalities, bone density issues, and other medical issues that are usually identified by a doctor's opinion on x-ray images of children's hands. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/rpsboy-6vxyzp

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - let roboy play rock paper scissors with people What it does: How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for RpsBoy: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/detective-soundboy

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We want Roboy to be able to recognize his environment and to interact with it. What it does: - The algorithm classifies sounds in 10 categories like dog barks, street music, children's play etc. \nRoboy outputs the result via his speech module. How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for Detective Soundboy: - We want: unsupervised learning using all the youtube data ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/brofist

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - As the goal for Roboy is to have the most human robot possible, it should be able to greet like us and respond when other people greet him in certain ways. it's only natural that he should be a cool dude, greeting his bros with an appropriate fistbump. What it does: - Greets someone when the person is standing in front of Roboy. The greeting gesture is made using roboy’s arms, hands and a facial expression. \nKinect detects the movements, filter outs some basic movements and sends the detected greeting movement to Roboy which then responds using its hands and face.\nRecognizes when someone wants to greet Roboy with a fist bump and triggers Roboy’s fist bumb motion. How we built it: - Kinect looks actively for hand movements and interprets the gestures in real-time. Using Kinect SDK we wrote a “relay” with C# which sends the commands to ROS Kinetic running on a python server on a different machine. The ROS on our system establishes a connection with Roboy and sends the movement command to the corresponding Roboy server. Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for Bro-Fist: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/4c-predictive-analytics-for-overbooking-optimization

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Each year, approximately 1 million guests are relocated due to overbooking. Walking guests costs the hotel industry an estimated $5 billion per year. What it does: - 4C is a cloud-based application that leverages predictive analytics to get actionable insights for optimizing overbookings by hotel sales managers. It relies on historical occupancy data, current & future reservations, variable room costs and walk costs to forecast the optimal rate of overbooking. How we built it: - See architecture in gallery above Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for 4C - Predictive Analytics for Overbooking Optimization: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/uoitmycampus_api

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - MyCampus is outdated and our idea was to improve the features and allow students explore more with the data. What it does: - Simple REST api that scrapes MyCampus data and returns a JSON How we built it: - We use python and Python-Flask Challenges we ran into: - We had issues gathering data because UOIT My Campus uses table layout and no data separation\nWe could not depoy on Heroku\nWe weren't able to deploy on to Ionic app due to time constraints Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We did something, hopefully would be helpful to the UOIT community What we learned: - We learn to use REST apis, and python, ionic services, plug-ins etc. What's next for UOITmycampus_api: - Improve the current api to scrape other sections of MyCampus and deploy to an app ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/fresh-finder

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Many people want locally grown food but many farmers markets schedules and vendors change regularly. If all the farmers markets were in one convenient interactive map, we can connect people to locally grown fresh food. This helps the local economy and the local vendors from tossing away unsold fresh food. And it's a great place for someone new in the city to meet the community. It's simply something we love that we wish could be easier to do! What it does: - Fresh Finder plots given data and shows relevant information for farmers markets in your area. Find out their hours, address, and social media. Follow your favorite farmers markets on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter! How we built it: - It was built using a Flask framework with a Python backend. We used a javascript frontend to process geoJson data to display into the google maps API. Challenges we ran into: - It was extremely difficult to find the right data and a _whole other world _ to work with it. - And half way through the mini-hackathon, we had to do a major pivot! Our original idea was to create an scrap tweets and map their geolocation. We were able to scrape APIs but hours later, we found that that rarely do tweets include geolocation even though the API allows for it. Accomplishments that we are proud of: - It works! - We have a functioning proof of concept that we can build on. =) What we learned: - API limitations can severely restrict project outcomes and the importance of scoping a project appropriately to the timeframe. What's next for Fresh Finder: - We hope to get a better dataset. Add filtering of the data so users can look specific vendors, types of vendors, and food type. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/jumpshyp

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Remember the certain airlines company who's stock plummeted after a certain PR disaster? It would've been really nice to sell before that happened... What it does: - Imagine being one of the first people to realize that the public is turning against a company you have a vested interest in, or imagine being one of the first people to see a positive wave of support for a company you are interested in investing in. Simply enter your phone number and company info, and receive text notifications if the companies Twitter sentiment 'velocity' passes a positive or negative threshold. You will be sent a text notifying you of the rapid rise in velocity as well as a link to view a simple webpage with stock information and a news feed of the company! How I built it: - Used tweepy python library for twitter streaming, twillio for text messaging, flask for serving web content, and mongo for storing phone numbers. Challenges I ran into: - Getting all of those things to work together! Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - This was my first solo hackathon! What I learned: - Don't be afraid to ask for help. What's next for JumpShyp: - who know??? ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/emotiongame

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The robot is taken to a lot places like schools. Kids want to play with it and have some fun. What it does: - It measures the emotions and facial expressions of people, reacts to their emotion them and tells them who did the best emotion. How we built it: - Using Realsense, Affectiva API and Google Speech to text and Speech synthesis toolkits Challenges we ran into: - Affectiva SDK worked with some specific system and libraries \nNo experience in ROS and connecting to robots Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Everything we did (Why not?!) What we learned: - ROS, Affectiva API, Speech Synthetics and recognition and How to bind them all What's next for EmotionGame: - Getting more people in the fun and point to the winner ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/ik-arm

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Roboys Muscles have no asolute position feedback.\nTo Improve on this topic, we want to do some manual IK. - But without sensors you cannot know, where the arm is, especially with Myrorobotics.\nThis is, where Intels RealSense camera comes into play.\nOur goal is to use the 3D information to find tha actual position of the arm in space and thus close the feedback loop. What it does: - To demonstrate this technology, we got the Roboy Arm working via ROS and mapped all the Motors of the shoulder joint.\nAn Intel RealSense camera is used as a sensor via ROS and extracts the sceleton information of the Arm angle of a nearby person.\nBy combining both technologies, we can thus replicate the Persons arm movements with the Roboy arm. How I built it: - Nachiket - Using C++, ROS, OpenCV\nDaniel - Using ROS, Python, C++ (Thanks to the Devs of Roboy for the help with the Roboy-ROS-API)\nFukushi - Using Intel Edison board as a ROS node for future Development, C++, ROS Challenges I ran into: - The Arm is a complex robotic development arm which implicates that many things didn't run as planned.\nSome actuators had to be repaired to make them work to their specifications - The IntelRealSense camera didn't provide the depth information at first Accomplishments that I'm proud of: What I learned: What's next for IK Arm: - Interpolate the arm position in more dimensions\nImplement the feedback loop with the RealSense ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/helpme-8za9yo

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Helping people in emergency situation when no one is around What it does: - detect people when they fall on the ground based on computer vision and speech recognition for emergency state confirmation. Adress and emergency state are sent by sms/call How I built it: - cmake, python, c++, google API Challenges I ran into: - camera and hand gesture Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - All the work What I learned: - Many things What's next for HelpMe: - Improve the hand gesture recognition ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/fizzbot

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What It Does: - FizzBot is a multifunction discord bot that aims to improve the League of Legends experience for players through a multitude of commands. An example of Fizzbot's functionality is improved counter picking, while many online counter picking algorithms go solely of historical matchups without regard for player's skill on the champion in question. Fizzbot takes into account the player skill of the champion to determine whether the counter pick is viable. Furthermore, Fizzbot improves team selection, as entering a player's name will yield a list in decreasing order of mastery and time spent on a given champion, this allows teams to get information about certain champ types a player plays and if that player would be a good fit for the team. How We Built It: - We used a combination of python and java to create this bot. Python was used primarily for the front end (ie. using the discord module to create a discord bot) and for web scrapping applications using the requests module to get page content and the BeautifulSoup module to parse the data and pull out important information from the "soup." Furthermore, we used Java in backend applications where Python would have been too slow for example our database for discord name and league name pairs. Challenges We Ran Into: - At one point, web scraping images became a significant challenge due to space and time complexity as well as the scraping itself. However, our team overcame this difficulty by breaking down the problem one step at a time and reading documentation to fix our code. Another problem we faced was the I/O interface with our java code and we fixed this with a simple text file. What We Learned: - Throughout the course of this project, we learned about efficient web scraping and web scraping regarding images. Moreover, we learned the challenges of coding a discord bot and keeping that bot running 24/7 using flask. Finally, we learned about meshing two programming languages together to improve the final result. Add FizzBot To Your Server: - ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/hardhatboy

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: What it does: - HardHatBoy supports 3 modes of operation:\nParty Mode (boom boom and bling bling): play party music and light up LEDs\nAssistant Mode: Answers general knowledge questions\nSorting Hat Mode: Assigns you to your team How I built it: - Attach a raspberry pi, switches, speakers and LEDs to the Hat.\nConnect it to the awesome DrQA server from the Dialog Revolution team.\nHave a smart hat! Challenges I ran into: - Installing big pip packages on the raspberry pi is a pain.\nConnecting to audio stuff on the pi with python can be more problematic than expected\nWires that don't work Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - Building the world's first smart and safe hat What I learned: - When stuff doesn't work on the raspberry pi, get a new one!\nDon't trust cheap wiring! What's next for HardHatBoy: - Connecting HardHatBoy to the Ceiling LED-Matrix ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/kalimbot

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: KALIMBOT- A musical robot that plays the Kalimba: Inspiration: - Build a remote controlled musical robot that plays an instrument built for humans. What it does: - The robot plays a Kalimba using 5 actuated motors/servos. It can play human input live and MIDI files. How we built it: - Bought a Kalimba, wrote code to actuate the motors Challenges we ran into: - Hardware, especially motor boards, Bluetooth MIDI RX callbacks, Latency Accomplishments that we're proud of: - It works!!, live MIDI to Serial, Remote control through WIFI What we learned: - Arduino, C++, Python, Laser cutting, working with motors/servos/steppers What's next for Kalimbot: - add random note generator, add motors for full chromatic scale (12 semitones) ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/rapboy

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Intersection of art and technology: Takes a word as input, generates lyrics related to this concept, translates text to speech, post-processes the audio, plays it on roboy: we used ready website for lyrics generation, used amazon polly for TTS, added post-processing logic, then wrote a client that connects to roboy's computer and plays the song: we wanted to train our own network for generation of lyrics, but didn't have enough time. we also knew very little about ros: our teamwork was great: how to tts, how to ros, how to process audio: become rap diva: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/shyroboy

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: What it does: How we built it: - We created ROS nodes using python scripts. You can see the state diagram and program execution flow in our GitHub repo. Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We made everything that we wanted running. Everything communicates beautifully. What we learned: What's next for ShyRoboy: The Presentation: - #slide=id.p1 ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/rollow

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Career profiles suck. Not enough data, little to no verification. Let's fix that with AI and Blockchain. What it does: - Create evidence and proof of what people know. Add more data so people can search for what they need, instead of searching for what's on resumes. How I built it: - Python, TODAQ API, vi Challenges I ran into: - API didn't work. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - 100% IBM and Mosaic 2.0 compatible. Reducing the size of the hash proofs. What I learned: - Ask for API keys ahead of time. What's next for Rollow: - Finish this PoC. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/dailypi

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - For most people, buying a smart home product is not worth the price. We wanted to make an elegant solution that offers all of the benefits that come with a smart home product without all the gimmicks. What it does: - On the machine learning side, the DailyPi scrapes data from reputable websites and uses it to speak things such as news headlines, plans for vacation or the weekend, and day, date and time.\nOn the website side, the DailyPi collects data from its users that can be used to register the device as an official DailyPi. How we built it: - We used a Raspberry Pi that can easily collect data and say it through a speaker in the English language, while taking advantage of its compact size.\nVenkat worked on the regitration website that was published as Challenges we ran into: - Collecting data from the registration webpage. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The DailyPi can speak updated information! What we learned: - Scraping data from user entries is difficult, but we were able to create a satisfactory product. What's next for DailyPi: - Improve the user-website experience. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/degrees-of-separation

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: How it works: - Simply enter two Twitter handles and see the path of followees that lead the end user to the start user. We created an algorithm that effectively performs BFS on the end user's followees to the start user's. The results (degrees of separation) are displayed in a nice visualization (using d3.js) and more info from Twitter is grabbed from the Tweepy API. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/covid-vaccine-bot

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Since everyone is booking appointments for covid vaccines, it is difficult to find the nearest open location near us. We wanted to make it convenient to find these open appointments, so that you can schedule an open appointment nearest to your location. What it does: - The program sends messages (MMS/email) when new vaccination spots are open. Users choose their own filters such as zip code, radius, and pharmacies. The users can opt to receive the notifications through phone or email. Additionally, the bot can read user questions about covid and respond to them. How we built it: - We started by understanding the API we were using and implementing that data inside our code. After that, we developed the implementation to read and send messages using smtplib and imaplib modules respectively in python. After that, we have to use google sheet API. Finally, we developed the bot responses to questions asked by the user. This includes scraping the data from the website link, and understanding different ways the users might format their questions. Challenges we ran into: - The first challenge we ran into was finding an API with the information we needed. Another challenge we ran into, was having the bot properly decompose and understand questions the user asks and provide the correct information accordingly. We also had to consider keeping the program running consistently, smoothly, and quickly. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We're a group of motivated Cal Poly students eager to learn new things and gain experience in programming. This being our first hackathon, we're very proud of all aspects of the project, as all members played a vital role in the development of this product! What's next for the covid vaccine bot: - Hopefully, the covid pandemic will end soon and we won't need our program. However, we can improve our program by implementing more APIs from reliable sources so that the bot can provide more information about covid-related data, to provide up-to-date, reliable, and accessible information to our users. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/how-basic-are-you

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We were inspired to work on this project by attending the data visualization and API integration workshop hosted by SLO Hacks members. What it does: - Our project takes a Spotify playlist URL as an input and essentially returns the proportion of how much of the playlist can be considered "basic." It determines this by checking if each song in the playlist was added while it was in the Billboard Top 100. This corrects for what we call the nostalgia effect, meaning that if you add a song that was in the Top 100 in the past, it can no longer be considered "basic." How we built it: - We built this project by utilizing Spotipy, which is a Python wrapper for the Spotify JS API. From there we scraped the necessary data + login and utilized flask to locally host the website along with the post processing in the background. We also utilized a Billboard Top 100 Charts Python API to pull the top 100 songs at a given date, which we use for determining whether or not a song was "basic." Lastly, we utilized Figma to design and build the website. Challenges we ran into: - We ran into many challenges along the way, stemming from creative blocks as well as from technical issues. We only had one developer familiar with most of the tools we were learning, so most of our technical issues arose from having to learn/re-learn languages and tools. Creatively, we also struggled the first couple of days with finding a project that we could realistically complete within the allotted time limit, given API limitations and client ID verification issues. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Throughout this whole weekend, we ran into a lot of issues. Whether these issues were creative or technical, we never gave up and attempted to find a way around everything. What we learned: - We learned how to effectively use APIs as well as flask, Python, Figma, and html in conjunction with each other to reach a final product. Additionally, we learned how to communicate effectively between designers and developers to combine our individual strengths and reach a common goal. What's next for How Basic Are You?: - In the future, we hope to introduce multi-playlist functionality in order to see the "basic" levels of all public playlists at once. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/mapm

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Struggle to find an visually appealing/easy to use interface to filter for suitable locations for housing What it does: - It curates ideal locations personalized with just a few inputs. We built it so that an end user would be able to get a quick idea of what areas would be suitable for one's lifestyle. To make this quick we implemented an algorithm that calculates the most optimal locations by simply adding a few factors like real estate prices, risk estimation (based on life expectancy and COVID 19), and scope of the search. How we built it: - For the frontend we used React.js (CRA) as our frontend web framework, Chakra UI for the styling of the UI components and Leaflet.\nFor the backend MySQL for the database, Python+Flask for our REST API. Challenges we ran into: - A whole bunch ranging from initially hosting on a platform like heroku and github pages, confusing documentation on leaflet and having to use a webscrapping bot to gather data. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Being able to deliver a product in such a tight deadline. Mobile responsive What we learned: - We learned a lot of things all across the board but I feel like deployment was something as a team we had to conquer. What's next for mapM: - More integration with other datasets and enhancing our algorithm to allow for greater visibility and user experience.\nAdd in the following features:\nEducation (School ratings)\nCrime rates \nCost of living\nIncome tax rate Important Note: - The deployment for the website is not yet fully done due to https security interfering with our REST api. Please use \nyarn install\nyarn start\nto start the frontend. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/tba-79txzb

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - You (the user) can give the program a URL to a YouTube video, and the program will tell you what's in the video. For example, it'll say that a person was in the video 82.59% of the time and that a car was in the video for 2.22% of the time. How we built it: - The program is entirely in Python. It uses four major packages: - The program does this: What's the AI/computer vision model running on the images?: - YOLOv5 ( running on the pretrained COCO weights Run it yourself: - Here's the link to the Google Colab: - After signing into your Google account and creating a copy of the Colab notebook, you can then switch out URLs and test the program yourself on YouTube videos that you choose. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/stats-machine

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: What it does: - Given a path to a csv data file and some inputs relevant to the desired statistical method, our application performs and visualizes K-Means Clustering, Simple Linear Regression, and Decision Trees. How we built it: - We used Kivy to provide us with an application and a window. We then used python scripts to read the csv data file, normalize the data, clean the data, and store it in a database structure. From there we have python and r scripts that perform various statistical methods. For visualization, we used r for the statistical methods. Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: - How to create an app combining python, r, and kivy What's next for Stats Machine: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/heating-at-home

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Many homes and apartments use electric heat. Electric heaters are 100% efficient at turning electricity into heat, but all they do is turn electricity into heat. Computers are also nearly 100% efficient at turning electricity into heat, but they can also do other useful work in the process! We wanted to find an energy-efficient, convenient solution by using your computer power to run Folding@Home and heat your home in the process. What it does: - Our solution tackles this waste by using your computer, which is effectively an electric heater, to contribute its computational power to science! When your thermostat detects the temperature is less than your ideal, it will run Folding@Home on your computer to heat your room. Rather than buying a space heater that contributes only heat, you can use your own computer to heat your space just like a space heater and you even contribute to science! Since your computer would already be running, our software would be more energy-efficient than buying a separate individual space heater. In addition, older computers could continue to lead useful lives well after their obsolescence, by contributing to both science, and keeping you comfortable in your home. How we built it: - We used the Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) protocol to allow communication between a temperature sensor and your computer running Folding@Home. The extensible nature of the MQTT protocol means you can utilize an existing smart thermostat or add zoned heating with a microcontroller and thermometer! Once the temperature in the room drops below the thermostat setpoint, your computer receives the _ turn on _ command and begins contributing to Folding@Home. Once the room temperature has reached the set point the heat is turned off. In addition, Heating at Home utilizes OpenRGB to control RGB lights on your computer to show when it is heating. Further integration with other smart home features such as lighting or thermostat presence detection is easy due to the extensible nature of MQTT! Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The electricity that is used in electric heating is only used for heating. By using that same energy to run Folding @ Home, we can contribute to important science and heat homes. (And we got RGB working!) What we learned: - We learned how to use the MQTT protocol with clients and brokers, and how to control RGB peripherals using OpenRGB What's next for Heating at Home: - Expanding our software to use other home appliances to use energy more efficiently. Also, conduct climate studies with BOINC. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/skilltree

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Problem: - COVID-19 has disrupted global economy at an unprecedented scale and Singapore, while nimble and diverse in its economy, still receives the impact of pandemic-increased unemployment. With businesses striving to become lean and efficient in operations to cut down costs, businesses that are not flexible enough in terms of human asset management leads to high retrenchment rates and skills shortages. This is where engagement is required to ensure flexibility and adaptability of manpower for business continuity and economic resilience. Solution: - SkillTree is a system powered by artificial intelligence (AI) to identify and recommend what relevant skills a (potential) employee is lacking and should upgrade. Natural Language Processing (NLP) will be heavily used to identify what are the most trending and relevant skills required for a specific job position before comparison with employee's profile. Word embedding will be used to associate the relevant skills to the job position based on customized input and data scraping from sources like Linkedin, the company's recruitment data and news. Employee profiles can also be used to evaluate what are the best-suited positions for better matching and further training. Feasibility: - SkillTree is a system which can be deployed by the government or by internal human resource teams to enhance business continuity and economic resilience through well-prepared and flexible manpower management. - A) Government Deployment - The system can be deployed by the relevant Ministries to better understand the job market to formulate education and manpower policies. For retrenched workers, SkillTree deployed together with WSQ courses and SkillFuture can help reduce between mismatch of skills and ensure the effectiveness of skill-upgrading. - B) Internal Deployment - Hiring managers can better understand and be updated on what skills (potential) employees are lacking instead of what they already have, encouraging for further engagements for promotion or restructuring. The employee can also make use of SkillFuture to develop themselves in a more guided and informed way. Technical details: - See the GitHub repo for more details - ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/smart-entry

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Smart Entry: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/shipment-predictor

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Due to covid19 demand for shipping has exponentially increased! What it does: - Suggest the best prediction for the next shipment amount. Which could be used to arrange available resources for shipments. How I built it: - Creating an AI model for predicting the exports. Challenges I ran into: - Due to unstable data, many preprocessing had to be done together with a lot of trial and error with different AI models to get the best results. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - After working on the project for more than 16 hours! I am proud that I was able to research and come out with the most optimal solution. What I learned: - I learn working with different API like Sci-kit learn, tensor flow Keras. What's next for Shipment Predictor: - A possible add-on would be a Notification System – Provide notification when the trend of the cost goes low (consumer or business owner)/ if more transportation occurs (to shipment owners). ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/edueat

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We chose to enhance students online and in-person education by focusing on the nutrition intake the average student gets from school. What it does: - Our platform is EduEat, a platform that educates users about the nutritional content of their meals. Users will take a picture of their meal to learn about what they have and don’t have in their meal. How we built it: - We used many types of technology to achieve this. For the website, we used a Flask framework, which utilizes Python, Jinja, HTML, and CSS. For the image analysis, we used the Google Vision API. Lastly, we made a website prototype with Marvel. Challenges we ran into: - We struggled to find proper algorithms for our situation, because our idea is unique in many aspects. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We learned a lot of code, and built a good website in a very short period of time. What we learned: - We learned a lot about coding and hackathons in general from the amazing workshops IBY hacks hosted. We also got helpful insights regarding school lunches and nutrition in general. What's next for EduEat: - In terms of next steps, we plan to improve our app and website, to a point where our platform is easily accessible and efficient at its job. To do this, we must enhance our computer vision algorithm, and spread awareness about our cause. We also want to gain help from other businesses supporting similar causes, and nearby schools interested in our idea. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/webschool

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - With online classes, students are facing new challenges to studying, particularly with time crunches and taking notes for a class. They are unable to plan a good timetable, and online classes don't have the same level of interactivity that in-person classes had. How can we use technology for an advantage here? What it does: - WebSchool is an open source platform where students can learn through interactive means. They can use AI to take notes of different classes, and can even make an intelligent timetable to plan their weekly schedule. This also contains a summarizer which can help students How we built it: - We built it using html5, bootstrap, python and php Challenges we ran into: - A lot of the languages and modules used were new for us Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Bootsrap website, the class, the timetable What we learned: - A lot of php, html, bootstrap and python-to-html What's next for WebSchool: - Develop WebSchool into a full fledged Learning Management System - Deploy WebSchool in several school districts to test the real time viability - After successful testing, approach investors so that it can be deployed on a mass scale for smooth online learning ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/league-of-fellows

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: \ud83d\udca1 Inspiration: - During the fellowship, some fellows might lack the incentive to attend informative talks, book mentor sessions, give a show and tell, interact with other fellows on discord, etc. Additionally, fellows might feel disconnected from the overall fellowship community outside of their respective pod. - League of Fellows aims to gamify the MLH Fellowship experience by allowing fellows and their pods to earn points for doing various activities throughout the fellowship (similar to MLH Local Hack Day). These accumulated points could potentially be used to redeem swag and secret rewards at the end of the fellowship (MLH sponsor us? \ud83d\udc40). - Activities that count towards points include attending events and live streams, interacting on Discord, mentor sessions, show and tells, winning hackathons, helping others in the fellowship community. - \nMake everything you do in the fellowship count!\n What it does: - \ud83e\udd16 Discord bot to tracks points earned by each registered fellow on the MLH Fellowship discord - \ud83d\udcca Web app to display helpful metrics, such as individual points earned, points earned by your pod, your pod's rank on a modern dashboard - \ud83c\udfc6 Leaderboards that visualizes points earned by different pods and where your pod stands - \ud83d\udd10 Generates secret codes for each event that admin can give out during live streams and events for fellows to redeem for points. - \ud83d\udcc5 View upcoming and past events in a central place and earn points for participating in them\n\ud83d\udc4d Easy Login and Registration with Discord OAuth Login ⚙️ How we built it: \ud83e\udd14 Challenges we ran into: - \nGenerating ideas for how fellows could earn points was a bit tricky as we didn't want there to be any sort of spamming going on.\nThe DB we used, PostgresSQL, was something new for most of us on the team and a challenge setting up. In the end, we all learnt a lot about working with relational databases.\nDesigning the REST API to fit the need of the frontend and the discord bot was a challenging task and required most of our time.\nSetting up Discord OAuth and making the platform work seamlessly between the backend, the frontend React app and the discord bot was daunting and required planning beforehand to decide on the architecture, and technologies that would make it all work.\nTime management was really challenging due to the largely varying timezones of team members. :P\n \ud83d\udcaa Accomplishments that we're proud of: - \nBuilding a platform that could drive more engagement from fellows.\nCreating a points management system that could be scaled to add more features and platform integrations\nLearning about building discord bots and OAuth and working with PostgreSQL\n \ud83e\udd13 What we learned: - \nWe learnt about working with Redux on the frontend, the benefits of using it, and scaling the application state with ease.\nWe learnt about and benefits and pitfalls of using relational databases and how modeling data is very different from NoSQL databases.\nWe had a meeting every day at a fixed time to plan divide work and check on each other's progress which helped us in understanding more about collaboration on an open-source project.\nWe learned and implemented open-source best practices like making use of the GitHub project board, setting up branch protection rules, adding Issue/PR templates, and following a consistent style for writing commit messages, etc.\n \ud83c\udfaf What's next for League of Fellows: \ud83d\udc40 Want to try out our project?: - \nJoin our test server: over to #\ud83d\udc49get-roles channel and assign yourself a role\nYou can now start using League of Fellows. Go ham and cheese \ud83e\uddc0! Start by heading to to authenticate your account.\n ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/cocoa-bot

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Working remotely can be hard. But building social connections when working remotely is highly important. This could be quite challenging sometings: meeting new people that you don't communicate usually is a step out of the comfort zone. Cocoa makes this step a bit easier, now you can book a meeting with a new person to chat or to get help with your problem and this person could be anyone in your organization. - Commands that you can use: - What's next: How we built it: - For Cocoa we used Python 3 and the pubic API for Discord and also ProgreSQL for the dabase and SQL Alchemy for working with the database. Architecture Diagram: - Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/audible-tweet-fun

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Due to the ongoing pandemic, we have been increasingly using our electronics to look at various screens. Our inspiration is to create an application that allows the user to hear tweet updates instead of reading them on a screen. This helps users reduce screen time usage while keeping them updated on the world around them. What it does: - \nAsks user for Twitter username.\nGathers the 5 most recent tweets of specified user. \nCalls on registered phone number and speaks out tweets in Twilio’s default voice.\n How we built it: - Written in python language, we use Tweepy Library to fetch Twitter API for tweets and feed that data to Twilio API which in turn calls users and plays the tweets. Challenges we ran into: - \nLimited input for cellphone numbers given we did not have a premium Twilio account.\n Creating a virtual environment proved challenging.\nEditing Twilio's own xml language (TwiML) to customize message. \n Accomplishments/What we learned: - \nHow to use Twitter API using Tweepy Library.\nHow to use Twilio API and customize the default message to be played.\nHow to authenticate the API using various secret tokens.\nLearned to collaborate and communicate.\n What's next for Audible Tweet Fun: - Possible additional functionalities: - \nDeploy an app or website that users can visit and initiate calls\nAdd functionality for user to register their own cell # \nCreate a virtual environment to encrypt our API credentials \nAdd functionality to schedule daily tweet updates\n ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/covid-19-risk-factor-predictor

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Description: - With the high volume of information concerning Coronavirus, we wanted to develop a user-friendly app that offers a brief analysis for currently identified risk factors for COVID-19. - A user selects corresponding information to see a relative prediction for COVID-19 based on given data Development: - We developed both on the front-end and back-end services. We used Flask to develop a web application in conjunction with Python as well as HTML/CSS/javascript. We analyzed data using Python and the pandas framework. Challenges: - Trying to combine different languages, frameworks, and libraries into one cohesive application. \nConnecting frontend to backend, including retrieving data from the form and posting the result on the web page using flask. \nComprehending Flask to use with other tools in order to properly extract, transform, and load data. Learning Experience: - Learning different tools and how they relate to one another in a development process.\nBeing exposed to different libraries and their relationship with types of data and processes.\nEnsured commitment to modular code so that functions could be readily distributed across the project.\nBecame familiar with version control and remote collaboration using git/GitHub, especially in terms of project management. What's next for COVID-19 Risk Factor Predictor: - Add more options for user input to generate a more insightful resulting analysis.\nConnect to API to use real-time data for data processing.\nCollect user feedback and use machine learning to optimize our predictor model.\nIncrease efficiency of stream of data so that the application can run faster. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/japanese-crossword-puzzle

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Some of us have picked up a hobby of learning new languages during these difficult times. We want to build a tool that can help people learn foreign lanugages, starting by learning the letters and vocabs via crossword puzzles! What it does: - Our app can read a JSON file that has Japanese words with English meaning, and generate random crossword puzzles for the user to solve! How I built it: - For the frontend, we used pysimplegui. The default JSON file that contains the japanese words are vocabs from the Genki Japanese text book. We used Python3 to write the random crossword puzzle engine Challenges I ran into: - Reading files and displaying utf-8 encoding; Rendering the selected tile on the crossword puzzle was difficult, because pysimplegui doesn't allow easy changes and reverting the changes of the tiles; writing the random crossword puzzle was difficult because we needed to make a dictionary that can take a regular expression for searching suitable words for building the puzzle. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - Learned to use pysimplegui and took on the challenge of building the crossword puzzle engine What I learned: - pysimplegui, unicode, regex dictionary implementation What's next for Japanese Crossword Puzzle: - can be expanded to Korean and other languages that uses alphabets. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/alexa-kerbal

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - Say "Alexa, tell flight control to launch to 100,000 metres" or "Alexa, tell flight control to fly me to the Moon" or "Alexa, tell flight control to Abort!" and Alexa will fly you there! How we built it: - Alexa -> AWS (API) -> GCP (WebSocket server custom API) -> Python process -> KSP (exposed API) Challenges we ran into: - Rocket science is hard... Setting up Python and especially WebSockets was hard due to misconfigurations. Also, KSP just updated so the mod we were using Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Rocket science was hard. It can launch any rocket to orbit and even fly to the Moon by itself! What we learned: - Rocket science. A lot of rocket science. (And how to program an Alexa skill) What's next for Alexa Kerbal: - More actions for the Alexa to perform. Fly back from the Moon. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/diseasedetective

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Other documentation:: - **Demo:**\n Pitch (Quick):**\n Presentation:**\n ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/big-data-econ-8s0pjo

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Tyson Smith What it does: - It tries. How we built it: - We tried. Challenges we ran into: - Time. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Compile-time error-free. What we learned: - self. is important in Python. What's next for Big Data Econ: - Getting it to work. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/clemson-dining-alexa-skill

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - I got tired of looking up the menu on my laptop to figure out where I wanted to eat. It just seemed like something that I shouldn't have to do in 2018, and now nobody has to. What it does: - You can ask Alexa about the overall menu for a campus dining location or for just a single station at a specific location. - Phrases:\nwhat does {dining_hall} have on the menu today\nwhat is {dining_hall} serving today - what's at the {station} bar at {dining_hall}\nwhat's on the {station} bar at {dining_hall}\nwhat does the {station} at {dining_hall} have today\nwhat's at the {station} at {dining_hall}\nwhat's on the {station} at {dining_hall} - Stations at Core:\nDeli\nDessert\nEntree Station\nGrill\nLite-sy Corner\nMongolian Grill\nPasta\nPizza\nSalad\nSoup - Stations at Schilletter:\nFresh Focus\nDeli\nGrill\nPizza\nSalad Bar\nDessert\nMongolian\nSaute\nSoup\nTaste of Home\nVegetarian How I built it: - Using AWS and Python Challenges I ran into: Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - Making my first ever Alexa skill in just 12 hours! What I learned: - How to scrape webpages using BeautifulSoup 4 and Python\nHow to write an Alexa skill\nHow to use AWS Lambda What's next for Clemson Dining Alexa Skill: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/wizards_dozen

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Getting Started: - Prerequisites - python >3.0\npygame\n Deployment: - simply ensure PyGame is installed and run wizards_dozen.py Authors: - See also the list of contributors who participated in this project. License: - This project is licensed under the GPLv3 License - see the LICENSE.md file for details Acknowledgments: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/city_os

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Custom the way you move What it does: - Depending to the user profile our project offers the user a unique way to do his daily mouvement How we built it: - Thank's to Python-Django for the UI, and Python for the IA, the help of Google Maps API and of course IBM for the Hosting Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are building a strong team with differents habilities to improve this project. We lead it from the very beginning to the end whit a great efficiency What have we learned: - We have learned a lot about Clouding Googles API and Google Assistant What's next for City_Os: - To develop this project we could make the AI smarter with weather handing and a better UX. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/slide-matcher

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Our inspiration is the hardship that we felt before the exam night. Fortunately, USC tries very hard to help the students using DEN and make sure everyone can study at their own pace and also can revise at the time of exams. We also get slides for the lectures. But, often times neither alone is sufficient. With slides, we can refer to information very quickly but it could be too dense to interpret without explanation. On the other hand, videos are quite helpful in understanding stuff but can also take hours to parse through. It would be great if we have something by which we can fully integrate visual and auditory learning experience. What it does: - Slide Matcher is a double-sided mapping between DEN videos and lecture slides to allow seamless transition between the two. We can watch a few slides on our own and when the material gets a little dense we can switch instantly to the exact point in the video where the same concept is being explained. It allows students to navigate between their own class notes, lecture slides and videos with a single click on this platform. How we built it: - We collected our data by extracting all the lecture slides with PyPDF and high entropy frames from the video using PySceneDetect. After extraction, we ran our matching algorithm which uses Structural Similarity to see how closely each of the frames matches up with slides using Image processing and audio analysis. Using this performance matrix, we identify the optimum video frame for each of the slide using OpenCV and Scikit-image with more than 90% confidence. Challenges we ran into: - Performance of the whole system depends on the accuracy of mapping between video and slides. Often times, videos don’t have a great capture of the slides and hence it’s difficult to integrate both the things. We tried solving the problem of integration using OCR at first, but it wasn’t enough to reach the accuracy that we were expecting. We tried image processing and it gave decent results. We thought if we can use audio searching with image processing, we might get better results. But audio searching was the most difficult part. We needed to make a transcribe file and do text matching with the OCR of frames. Optimizing this and making it look good with ease of use was also challenging. We also struggled to work with so many libraries with sometimes very few or comparatively less documentation. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Make a decent prototype of what we have imagined connecting two things. We also built a seamless front end that looks decent and minimalistic. What we learned: - We definitely had issues working with multiple libraries to accomplish our tasks, bad documentation, fix bugs in shorter time, but we powered through together. What's next for Slide Matcher: - To improve mapping algorithm. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/short-short-term-memory

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Frustrated when you can't find things you often misplace? Wish you had the power to search and find things/people sitting at your desk? What it does: - The application has multiple components ranging from smartphones to servers. Smartphones are the entry point of the system which supplies our server with real-time video streams that our server uses to perform object detection and facial recognition using Microsoft's Azure custom vision api. The result from this response is used to index images based on confidence. With this index, the user can perform a search to find objects that he may generally forget in his daily life. How we built it: - We used IP Cam to capture real-time video from smartphones and feed it to a python opencv server running to process the video feed. After extracting feeds using opencv, we used Microsoft Azure custom vision API to detect objects like keys, wallets even faces. We train the neural net with our custom images to perform personalized image searches. We used a simple and embedded database to persist indices which can be queried later. We used a javascript front end to display the location where the user misplaced some object. Challenges we ran into: - No hardware cameras, we used smartphones as webcams.\nGoogle cloud, Microsoft, AWS vision APIs failed to detect small images like keys.\nUsage of the cloud to store and retrieve images for the sake of feeding to APIs. This was decreasing the performance of our APP. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Streaming images peer-to-peer in order to improve performance, thereby eliminating the middleman and not incurring a cost of cloud storage.\nUsing multiple cameras to find objects. One line of code to add a new camera to monitor. What we learned: - Using opencv for real-time video processing.\nStreaming images to the APIs and clients instead of storing in the cloud and retrieving later. What's next for Short Short Term Memory: - IPO November, Christmas in December! Make it a platform for users to add a personalized image for the application to track and find. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/cnn_faces

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Bio-metric authentication using emotions, this is two separate models used to determine the emotion of the person submitting a picture. Ideally it is combined with biometric authentication used to not only log in, but log in with a set expression to ensure another level of security. What it does: - This is a tensorflow convolutional net model to determine the mood of the user. How I built it: - I used a standard sized neural net due to the limitations of my hardware. But I have a VGG net built as well that could easily up the accuracy. Their is also a sense of ensemble methodology, I have also built a LinearSVC using Scikit-learn to make it's own prediction from here the two must agree to make a prediciton. Challenges I ran into: - Creating the front end for biometric login, I did this alone and didn't have time. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - This is built entirely in tensorflow no higher level API. What I learned: - I learned more about multi-level classification there are 7 emotions to classify with this model What's next for CNN_FACES: - Implementing a user state can allow for more security authentication with facial biometric login. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/robolegs

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Human inspired walking: - At the beginning of the hackathon we had an idea to turn the couple of myorobotic motors, its control electronics, support structure and microcontrollers into a robot which can stand and stabilize itself. - The first challenge was getting readings from the joints angular sensors with CAN communication protocol. The Genuino board which we planned to use had incompatible pinout with the CAN shield. After making it work we connected the Genuino bord to the PC and transmitted the data via a ROS node written in python. Then we used an existing control program of the motors as a baseline for our control and extended it with the PID control which stabilizes the legs using the information from the joints angle sensors and spring displacement sensors available on the motors. - The main challenge was to understand the sensors, its calibration and implement an efficient PID control. - At the very end of the hackathon our robot can already stabilize itself and counteract small disturtions. - We learned about myorobotics, how to exchange tendons after failed attempts as well as about robot control algorithms. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/many_faced_roboy

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: The Idea: - The Many Faced Roboy is an interactive Game using Roboys many "Faces" and the Device of your choice (as long as it supports Telegram). The main idea is to showcase multiple technical possibilities of roboy as well as their integration into other system all while having a fun game for a demo. Overview: - The system is split into a very small client service which is simply used to enable communication to a chosen device via Telegram and the server which contains all the game logic and Roboy interaction. The Implementation is primarly done in Python (containing Python3 and Python2) but also uses some UNIX bash scripts. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/mind-control-vuq9t0

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiriation: - We want to help disabled people who cannot use their body to interact with the world. Therefore we build a brain machine interface to control the motion of a robot. What it does: - It measures electric potentials of the ocular muscles to control the eye movement of Roboy. Challenges we ran into: - Signal from EMG is mostly too noisy to extract reliable data. Hardware incompatibility and get all the libraries to work. What we learned: - Using Nerf gun; defending our castle Whats next for Mind Control: - Take over the world -> WORLD DOMINATION ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/uber-assistant

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration Provide an intuitive interface to book uber and a lot of value adds: What it does User can book uber by "Ok google" on any android phone: How we built it We built it using google api.ai, google actions api, uber api and python flask asthe web hook: Challenges we ran into As this is a nascent area, there is little documentation and sample code. Also there are integration challenges as google actions client sdk is only in node sdk. Further we faced some challenge in training the program: Accomplishments that we're proud of We succesfully used google ai.api and google actions api to process natural speech and integrated with uber api for the first time. A lot of firsts :): What we learned: What's next for Uber Assistant: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/uber-events

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - UberEvents is inspired by problems that consumers face in their everyday lives that Uber can help solve. Common problems faced when it comes to big events are bad traffic, high surge, fewer rides, etc. This is where UberEvents comes in to make our lives easier. What it does: - Schedules rides in advance of big events for better planning. How I built it: - We built it using python, reactJS, html, CSS and the Uber API ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/wesuggest

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Wanted Wesleyan students to be able to raise issues and make suggestions about life at Wes. What it does: How I built it: Challenges I ran into: Accomplishments that I'm proud of: What I learned: What's next for WeSuggest: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/smart-contacts-directory

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - To help the visually challenged browse through and do multiple tasks in a phone directory by converting the instructions in text to speech. What it does: - It does help in managing a list of contacts and their details. SmartDirectory is a digital phonebook that allows users to carry out various tasks like adding, viewing or deleting/removing one or several contacts; adding other details alongside contact numbers, such as, name, email, date of birth, category of contact, etc. How I built it: - Using Python and pyttsx3 module Challenges I ran into: - Bugs and Errors Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - Successful Compilation and Execution What I learned: - debugging and optimization of code, text to speech conversion, etc. What's next for Smart Contacts Directory: - Speech to text conversion, Improvement in UI/UX ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/watchcov

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Most news outlets or information sources present data on COVID-19 in the form of graphs or tables of statistics. When there are filters involved, graphs and tables can seldom accurately capture the complexities of the combinations of age, gender, report date and exposure in relation to the distribution and number of COVID-19 cases. These presentations of data are often difficult to visualize or keep track of since each of the many public health units across Canada report their own COVID-19 case data and so people are left with collections of data. We thought it would be useful to combine these various sources to allow for data visualization on a single map of Canada which makes it easier for people to interpret and understand COVID-19 case data in Canada by any combination of age, gender, report date, exposure, and case status so they can get an idea for Canada’s progress in the pandemic. What it does: - WatchCov provides a simple case visualization tool for anyone curious about the distribution of COVID-19 cases in Canada. WatchCov allows users to filter COVID-19 case data by any combination of age range, gender, case report date interval, method of exposure and case status providing useful visuals to represent the data of interest. How we built it: - Front end: Javascript, html/css geodata\nBackend: Used Flask, Python: Datetime, csv, json \nNote: Used only half of the full dataset due to limitations of heroku. - Our Flask server processes the CSV file and saves the data in memory. We provide API endpoints to query the data based on several parameters (i.e. case status, date range, gender, etc.). - Our front-end utilizes the AmCharts JS library to render geoJSON data. Every time the user updates the filters, there is a call to our backend which returns the data. We decided to delegate the computations to a server since AmCharts already uses a lot of processing power to render the map. - We deployed the web app on Heroku. However, due to the memory limit of the free servers, we were unable to download the entire dataset. Thus, we decided to only use half of the dataset for this presentation so many regions do not appear on the map. Challenges we faced: - It was difficult finding reliable data which included most, if not all, of the public health units across Canada. We also had some trouble deciding on how we wanted to display the data so it would not crowd the map and was easy to understand for everyone. Accomplishments we are proud of: - We are proud that we were able to produce a simple and efficient website. We are especially proud of our UI design which we expect users to be able to understand and operate without trouble. In addition to our simple design, individual filter searches do not take a lot of time to process and refresh the map encouraging users to visualize different combinations of filters. What we learned: - We learned how to process csv file data such that applying different filters will not take too much time to process and the data presented will fit the filters applied. We subsequently learned how to load csv files into JSON format. We also learned how to build a website using Javascript and Python. What's next for WatchCov ?: - We are planning to add support for vaccination data as soon as it becomes more readily available to allow for overlay of vaccination data and case data to monitor outbreaks and effectiveness of vaccines. We also plan to be able to visualize changes in cases as well as vaccinations over a time period which will provide a nice graphic for how the SARS-CoV-2 virus is behaving in Canada and to show our progress in fighting the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We will also figure out how to use the full data set to get around the heroku limitation. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/using-genetic-algorithms-to-solve-msa

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We came up with this idea when we tried running a MSA tool on 64 genomes, it took more than a couple hours and then my computer crashed. We realized that this is a problem that many people will face when trying to work with sequence alignment. So, our plan is to create a faster way while sacrificing some accuracy. What it does: - We started with creating multiple groups of possible alignments that were randomly generated. Then we calculate the fitness of each group to see which combination of alignments is the most accurate. We take the most accurate few and then apply mutations and crossovers. This gives us the members of the next generation and we continue this until we get a decent result. How we built it: - We built is using Python and the Biopython library. We also got our data from the NCBI datasets. Challenges we ran into: - Our original idea was to create a visualization tool for aligned DNA sequences, however, when we tried using a pre-existing MSA such as Muscle or MAFFT it took a very long time and did not complete. We changed our idea last minute to work on how we could make a faster MSA tool. What we learned: - This was our first time working with DNA sequence datasets and Biopython. We learned a lot about what is involved in bioinformatics and the problems that they might face. What's next for Using Genetic Algorithms to Solve MSA: - Next for GAMSA we need to work on adding constraints, so the random insertion of spaces is not so random. Currently the chances of find a good alignment by randomly generating the pool is very slim that that is something we will work on in the future. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/closest-dna-sequence

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Having learned about parallel programming, we decided to put our skills to the test and implement a novel parallel edit distance (Levenshtein Distance) algorithm. What it does: - It finds the minimum amount of edits needed to change one DNA sequence to another, which is a metric in determining the similarity of two DNA sequences. How we built it: - We built it using Python, Numba, Numpy, and the concepts that were taught in our parallel programming course to be able to fully take advantage of today's multi-core processors and parallel computers. - The implementation was based on the following algorithm: \nSadiq, M.U., Yousaf, M.M., Aslam, L. et al. NvPD: novel parallel edit distance algorithm, correctness, and performance evaluation. Cluster Comput 23, 879–894 (2020). Challenges we ran into: - Numba was a bit difficult to learn; unlike native Python, some variables had to be type annotated, and if it wasn't it would throw errors. We wanted to optimize this to run on a GPU so it could be even faster, but we aren't very familiar with CUDA. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The custom algorithm indeed did greatly speed up computation compared to the regular algorithm, even when the regular algorithm was parallelized. What we learned: - How to parallelize in Python, graphing with Numba. What's next for Closest DNA sequence: - Learn CUDA so we can have it run on a GPU to optimize performance. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/covid-sim-mlyvbh

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: How it works: - Based on which buildings are turned on or off, we can see how the happiness of the people and the spread of the virus are affected. How to use: - \nRun main.py\nHover over buildings to get building information\nClick on buildings to toggle it open/close\nPress spacebar to go 6 hours forwards in time\n ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/vax-pass

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Throughout our brainstorming session to come up with an idea for us, we thought of when Justin Trudeau said he wants to create a vaccine pass once we are all able to get the vaccine to let others know were vaccinated. What it does: - Vax Pass is a virtual pass that creates a QR code after filling out a questionnaire, this QR code can be scanned by businesses or companies to know who has and hasn't been vaccinated. How we built it: - We built this project in python using different python plugins, such as the QRcode6.1 and google sheets API for a database. Challenges we ran into: - The QR code would not show and pop at some points. We ended up getting it to work in the end but then tried to have the laptop webcam work and read the QR code, we ran into issues with it not reading the QR code and closing the window for the camera. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The two big accomplishments we are proud of would be getting the QR scanner/writer working and establishing a connection to the Google Sheets database. The QR scanner was a bit iffy at first, but being able to write and decode a QR code on the fly was a huge win for use. Likewise, it was a bit tricky to establish the connection to the database, but once it worked it was a huge morale boost. What we learned: - IO is hard! On a more serious note, we had the opportunity to learn how to work with QR codes this weekend. They're a very powerful tool to utilize! What's next for Vax Pass: - We will be emailing Trudeau with offers to buy Vax Pass tonight. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/a-model-predicting-covid-19-variant-susceptibility

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We were inspired by the recent emergence of new major COVID-19 variants that have popped up in the UK, South Africa, and Brazil, and we wanted to find a way to predict which variant an Ontarian was likely to catch based on some factors that we isolated. What it does: - Our model is simple: it is a set of classification trees trained and tested by COVID-19 case data sourced from the Ontario Public Health Authority that details a case's age, gender, most recent possible avenue of exposure to the virus, and city resided in. To use the model to predict which variant one was most likely to catch, one would simply gather their information and follow the tree's branches in accordance with it until reaching a leaf node. How we built it: - Using many of Python's libraries such as random, scikit learn (the main ingredient to creating our classification trees), numpy, pandas, and others, we were able to effectively transform our original, raw dataset into the model that we are submitting here. Challenges we ran into: - The biggest challenge we had to deal with was the problem that the dataset we were able to extract and clean from the Ontario Public Health Authority did not contain a variable that indicated whether an individual case had contracted a variant of the virus, and so we were forced to think outside the box to make our classification trees work. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are proud of the way in which we were able to work as a team that had never actually worked together before and was assembled at essentially the last minute due to others pulling out of the competition. Also, despite the fact that we could not figure out what we wanted to explore or create for almost the first 12 available hours, we feel proud that we were able to pull ourselves together and agree on creating this as our final product. What we learned: - One of our biggest takeaways from this experience was the discovery of many different Python libraries and methods that could be used in data analysis that simplified our work considerably, which we will no doubt continue to use for our future projects. What's next for A Model Predicting COVID-19 Variant Susceptibility: - Originally, we had wanted to use Moderna, Pfizer, Astra-Zeneca, and Johnson & Johnson's clinical trial data to build a model that would predict for people the vaccine that they should take in order to maximize efficacy and build immunity. However, as this data is not yet available to the general public, we settled on building our model around the analysis of the 3 major COVID-19 variants that had recently popped up. If the pharmaceutical companies' data is one day released publicly, we could expand on this model idea, except this time with COVID-19 vaccines instead of variants. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/fika-news

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We want to have less biassed media content and at the same time know what is going with the World. What it does: - This platform uses news from GDELT to create a customized experience for the user, so they can easily and intuitively learn what are the issues of the World right now with the bias of normal media. How I built it: - It is built with Flask using jinja2 for the html templates Challenges I ran into: - Small bugs in code, data cleaning, data volume Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - The end up with a final and functional product that can indeed be useful for users. With a small amount of time, we were able to get together our differents abilities and mindset and we came up with a product that reflects the values of all members of the group. What I learned: - We improved our communication and program skills. We learned how to better structure a project and how to manage delays in our initial planning. We adapted the idea during the night and we are really proud of the final result. What's next for Fika News: - The next steps for our project will be to implement the history telling for new stories involving a time feature and also integrate the data scraping and cleaning on the fly for users. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/redstone-inator

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: What it does: How I built it: Challenges I ran into: Accomplishments that I'm proud of: What I learned: What's next for Redstone-inator: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/fifa-data-analytics

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Admiration for FIFA '19 and we wanted a cool keyboard and mouse What it does: - Demonstrates data analytics using a FIFA '19 dataset How we built it: - We imported a .csv dataset from Kaggle with FIFA information, did extensive cleaning, and performed analysis on the data Challenges we ran into: - There was incomplete data, fields with None values that needed to be filled, and difficult immediately identifying the meaning of certain fields Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Working as a team! What we learned: - How to win a data science competition What's next for FIFA Data Analytics: - Additional statistical modeling using our data ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/quantify-c7sa1i

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - There are many small businesses in Atlanta because Atlanta is a entrepreneurship hub. Many people pursue entrepreneurship to expand their network and retain profits. A common problem for businesses is keeping up to date with the current health of their company. Many small businesses in particular, don’t have systems put in place to measure their overall success. What it does: - Quantify depicts the overall health of the business with key metrics such as: costs of goods sold, operating expenses, current assets, long-term liabilities, total debt, cash flow, etc. We decided to create a web app that gives businesses a grade of how well their business is performing. We based the grades upon different inputs that the owner provides and weighed them based on importance. The user can submit their data and the site provides metric analysis based on the input data. This analysis page gives them a breakdown of their grade to understand where and how to grow. How we built it: - We built the web application utilizing back end and frontend development. We built the web application utilizing Python, PHP, and HTML/CSS. We also used Adobe Photoshop to customize the layout and design of the web application, adding text boxes, a logo, and a background. Challenges we ran into: - Some challenges we ran into were pulling real data needed for the application because the data we could find was limited. In addition, we can find data on what companies are doing for their performance and overall sales, however it is difficult to find industry-specific values and metrics that tell the whole story. If we had more time, we would be able to get more information. Accomplishments that we’re proud of: - We are proud of the layout and functionality of the web application. The application displays the metrics and the grade received for different business industries. We were able to build a application that will be useful for businesses in the long run to compare their past and present metric scores. What we learned: - We learned to preserve and keep going to reach our goal.With perseverance and a strong support system we were able to make quick changes and successfully implement our application. We also learned to utilize our skills and put them into practice and research what we didn’t know to get more insight. What’s next for Quantify: - Next, we plan to develop our application and add more features and pages to our application. We also plan to create a user login base system where companies can use their metrics to compare their progress against past data. The ultimate goal is a functional program that allows the user to achieve a metric goal. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback: