Datasets:

yiyic

/

devpost_project_py_descriptions

like 0

https://devpost.com/software/open-the-door

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - For the hardworking Roboyans, entering the Roboy room can be difficult, especially when the key is already borrowed and everyone in the room is too busy to pay attention to Telegram chat. So we want to make a door bell, which rings when somebody send the "door please" sticker in the group. In addition, if possible, we hope that we can directly open the door by telegram. What it does: - It informs the people in the Roboy room to open the door for other Roboyans. It can also directly open the door. How we built it: - We use a Telegram bot to listen to the messages sent in the Roboy group. The bot runs on a Raspberry Pi. We use python to write the code. On the other hand, we use an ESP32 to build a door opener. It controls a motor. After it receives the instruction, the motor will pull a string to press the open button of the door so that the door will open. Challenges we ran into: - Though the Raspberry Pi with the Telegram bot doesn't rely on a specific network to work as long as it has access to the Internet, it needs to be in the same one with the door opener to send instructions to it. However, the WiFi signal downstairs by the door is too weak so we can't establish a stable connection. Therefore in the end we failed to actually open the door directly with Telegram. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The door bell functions quite well, and the door opener can actually open the door! What we learned: - double check the pins on board before you use them. What's next for Open The Door: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/emotions-2-beer-converter-3exnsg

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Depending on the emotions of people, they should drink beer or better should drink beer. That's why we came up with the idea of recognizing emoitions of people, let the matrix creator light up accordingly and let it have a conversation with the person which in the end leads to leading the person to the nearest bear. What it does: How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/coinboy

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: What it does: - It displays a qr-code for a lightning invoice on the Website.\nAfter scanning it with Eclair Testnet on your smartphone and paying the desired amount, the server connects to a raspberry pi with MatrixCreator LEDs and turns them on for 10 seconds. How we built it: - We set up a lightning node and put a Website built with django on top of it.\nA python script checks for payments in the background and connects to the raspberry pi with the lightshow if money was recieved. Challenges we ran into: - Connecting through grpc did not work at the beginning\nWe couldn't call ROS-commands on the Pi because the bashrc checks if it is sourced from an interactive session and does not set up the ROS environment if sourced from a script. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Working prototype What we learned: - Read the official docs first What's next for CoinBoy: - Improve integration of payments into webserver to be able to pay for different Roboy services ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/classe

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - ClassE uses student evaluation data to rate each course-professor pairing to empower students to make informed registration decisions. How we built it: - A server running mysql supplies enrollment and evaluation data as JSON objects using web.py. Our web page consumes these objects and returns useful data to the user using jquery. Challenges we ran into: - The bulk of our project involved parsing university published data into a format that we can perform analysis on. This took hours. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - It works... It actually works What we learned: - Debugging Perl scripts you wrote at 3am will make your eye bleed What's next for ClassE: - We'd like to implement some pretty graphs, and a lot more metrics for professor performance. The data is there, we just need to format it in a useful way. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/transcript-parser

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We were inspired to create this project since we realized how difficult it is for students to sit down and watch an hour lecture in one sitting, since we have experienced this multiple times. This inspired us to create a web application that cuts up a long Zoom lecture into smaller videos since we believe it will make remote learning easier as well as increase student retention rates. What it does: - The Transcript Parser takes in an input of a Zoom video and the transcript for the video. Then the program will use natural language processing to scan the transcript and split the video when a specific ending word is said (for our demo, we used the word dainty). With this, the program will return back the Zoom lecture split up into smaller videos according to the professor. How we built it: - This web application was built using Challenges we ran into: - Some challenges that we ran into with this project were trying to learn flask since none of our members were experienced with it. Also, we ran into an issue where we had spent extra time writing code in order to parse the transcript that was not needed in the end. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Accomplishments that we're proud of are that we learned how to implement Flask as a backend. As well as using HTTP in our web application. What we learned: - From this project, some of our members learned about backend development and we all learned how to use flask. What's next for Transcript Parser: - For the Transcript Parser, we plan on deploying the web application using Heroku as well as add features to this program that we believe will help remote learning. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/explorantine-nhezvm

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - All of us go to school in Concord, MA, a town known for its local history. Many of these local businesses have taken a hit during the pandemic. In this time of physical isolation and political polarization, mental health issues are on the rise as well. We sought to create a solution to both of these problems. What it does: - Explorantine helps a user decide what locally-run business they can safely visit based on their interests. Based on factors like activity, location, price range, and how the user is feeling, our site will recommend a list of activities gathered by the Google Places API. Given these qualities, the input data is processed with a filtering algorithm that matches the activity parameters with specific locations. If the user prefers an activity outside for COVID safety reasons, the user can tweak that as well. If you’re on a budget, no problem! We have you covered. - The mood feature is a result of the pandemic because many people do not know what to do to get out of their house given that their normal activities are no longer feasible. People who only have an abstract concept of what they want to do can type their mood into this feature, which correlates with several mood keywords that we have defined using the NLTK library, a vector library that correlates words based on meaning. How we built it: - Our tech stack included Python, SQLAlchemy, Flask, spaCy, NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit), Javascript, HTML, CSS, and Bootstrap. - We used Flask to bridge the front-end with various Google Cloud Platform APIs like Places and Geolocation. The backend calculated factors like a user’s current location, which restaurants are closest to them, and which restaurants passed filters depending on price range, closeness, and whether it was indoors or not. - Before, we have not been as comfortable with using the Google Cloud APIs, but it turns out that it was very simple. We just needed a few things: An API key, some formatted parameters, and the Requests module. Problem solved! - We also built our own APIs within our app to allow for the flow of information and easy conversion from moods to activities to location types to specific places for the user. Challenges we faced: - One obstacle we faced was in hosting our website on Glitch and Github. Because of the dependencies of our website, the project was either taking up too much memory or too much disk space. We knew that we couldn't do our website justice if we downsized our website to fit the Glitch and Github, so we reached out to organizers and were able to reach a compromise that still allowed our website to shine in the way it deserves. - We also had some trouble with using API keys in a safe way. When we made our repository public, Google managed to discover our private API keys there and notified us that it would be unsafe to leave them there. From that, we removed them from the repository. This was a bit frustrating as we knew that people wouldn't be able to use our website straight ahead. - Lastly, we tried to style and format the website without using an API or framework to do it for us, researching web design font pairs and color palettes to do so. However, we decided that the product with the styles.css edits did not look as good as the one with plain bootstrap, so we decided to keep it for version 2, as a future goal. Future Goals: - In the future, we hope to optimize this algorithm. Currently, it takes a while because we make so many calls to the Google API, but there is an opportunity to reduce the number of calls we make by learning the full capabilities of the Google parameters and keywords. - Furthermore, we also hope to add an image for each result listing. We believe this is important because local stores and businesses often have a style that is distinct and unique to the people of this community, and we hope that Explorantine can be a place to take comfort in a shared culture despite challenges. - We also hope to add a feature that allows individuals to connect with their friends to find a common location. Each user can add their specific preferences, and we hope our algorithm can account for all of the people in this group’s preferences to find the most enjoyable activity for all of them. - Note: the private API keys have been removed from the Github repository for safety reasons. If you would like to try our project, email caspian.ahlberg@concordacademy.org for access. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/optimized-sports-betting

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We noticed how Bookmakers(the people who make the odds for betting websites) calculate the odds in a way that they would always get money and the customers are at a great disadvantage. We decided to make this project to assure that people can get the best odds. What it does: - Our project scrapes the web, looking into many sports betting websites, to compare the different odds on these websites. It then recommends where to bet based on its results. How we built it: - We used primarily used python and json to write the program. Challenges we ran into: - It was quite difficult to select the specific data we wanted from the odds-api we used. We had to run into a bunch of bugs and also really think about how the systems work -it was all fun to be honest. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - This was the first hackathon for most of our team members and we handled quite well actually. What we learned: - So many things! Working on a projected, being so focused as we were, gave us a perspective of what the coding life is like. The first time isn't going to work but that final 'eureka!' moment that you get is priceless -truly it is. What's next for Optimized Sports Betting: - We plan on hosting it on aws, and get it running. We also plan to improve our project by making it work for as many sports as there are. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/project-pennywise

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Halloween themed games What it does: - Basically a halloween themed escape room puzzle How I built it: - Using Python and tkinter Challenges I ran into: - Lack of time to fully create the project Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - Learned OOP and GUI What I learned: - Learned OOP and GUI What's next for Project Pennywise: - Full fledged horror game ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/halloweebs

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Overview: - \nAn app allows tracking of customers in various services around them. These services can be registered on the app. It doesn't allow more than a certain number of people to be in one location and helps\nto maintain social distancing.\n - \n\n\n Feature:: - \nMap integration to track users' locations.\nAllow services to be registered on the app. Each service has its own autogenerated QR code.\nDisplay all services registered on the app on the map.\nDisplay the number of people currently at each service location. Track users' locations by asking them to scan the QR code every time they enter or leave. (LIVE TRACKING IS OFF)\nDisplay different colors for crowd status in the services locations:\n\n\nRED: not recommended to visit\nYELLOW: almost full\nGREEN: empty and safe to visit\n\nTrickOTreat mode (LIVE TRACKING IS ON AND QR CODE FEATURE IS OFF):\n\n\nSwitch to this feature after a certain time at night or let users toggle.\nRecommend paths for the user to follow around the neighborhood. Let users select the number of Halloween services to visit and recommend the closest services that are safe to visit. \nLet users edit the recommended path and add their own Halloween services to visit, if a Halloween service is in a red zone, recommend another path.\nLet houses allowing children to trick or treat register on the app. (NO QR code feature)\n\n Repository:: - \n\n Team members:: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/hermes-luxury-cars

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We were inspired by Tesla and Faraday Future Cars web pages.\nThe database and search pages were inspired by MakeMyTrip, CarDekho and other Travel Agency pages What it does: - The web pages allows us to rent/buy cars based on a particular brand, model, location and date. Payment can be completed using Razorpay which allows all major UPI transactions.\nIt also allows you to login/ register and view details of the cars to buy. How we built it: - The frontend was built using ReactJS, TailwindCSS and Material-UI.\nThe backend and APIs were made using NodeJS and ExpressJS.\nDatabase was handled using MongoDB.\nThe hosting was done using Vercel(frontend), Firebase(API) , mLAbs(database) and GitHub(codebase). Challenges we ran into: - Time Management, Getting good pictures, Transparent NavBar and Special Scroll. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Special Scroll, Transparent NavBar, Simplistic UI , Database management and RazorPay integration.\nAll Pictures used are copyright-free from Unsplash and Peexels.com What we learned: - TailwindCSS \nMaterial-UI\nUnsplash and Peexel Usages\nVisual Impact of Images\nSimplistic UI\nTime Management What's next for HERMES LUXURY CARS: - User Profile Page\nIncreasing Car Database ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/7ader

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: How I built it: - Flask as a Backend\nFlutter as a frontend for mobile Student's APP ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/iot-irrigation

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Aims: - The aim of this project was to create an open source, automatic irrigation system, to give anyone the ability to automate one more thing away using the magic of IoT. - The system uses low-power LoPy devices to collect local data about the user's environment (humidity, temperature, sunlight intensity), transmit that data to the cloud for processing, process the data with the computational power of a cloud-hosted solution (potentially incorporating historic data, weather forecasts, and presenting the data to the user in a web app / phone app format), and control any given irrigation valves automatically based on the need. Parts of the system: - LoPy parts: low-power components using LoRa for communication, to make power draw minimal and maximize reach - these can be placed pretty much anywhere around the propery the user decides (with the exception of the controller, which will draw more power thanks to the WiFi communication with the cloud, and should be somewhere inside the house, connected to an electric outlet. - Parts of the system (each in its own folder): Current state: - Currently, the server does a very rudimentaty calculation to decide when to turn the actuators on - it decides only based on the ground humidity. Ideally, it'd use weather forecasts and more different measures and sensors; we didn't have time to get that working during the hackathon. For the same reasons, the app does not yet connect to the server. All of the data flow and logic between the LoPy components and the cloud server work, though - it just uses LEDs instead of turning actual valves because we didn't have, well.. valves. - We didn't have the time to implement the app or visualization. Stretch goals: - A stretch goal we have been considering is an automated defence system: this kind of low-power mesh of sensors and actuators could be extended with presence detection systems, maybe hooked up to the main home security system, and could remotely turn on hoses which would spray an intruder with gasoline, then produce a spark close to them. Somewhat gruesome, but could help in a zombie apocalypse scenario ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/https-github-com-rokyfox-iot-lock

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: We wanted to build a lock that could unlock the door remotely.: It drives the motor to lock and unlock the door: We created code to send and receive encrypted messages to activate the lock: Challenges we face: We had problems with getting iota to work: Finally got the motor working through iota: How to work with raspberry pi and iota: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/covid-tower-defense

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - In light of the emergence of Covid-19 that has deeply shaken all of our lives, we have created a fun new game that raises support for our frontliners, while also building awareness about different dangerous sicknesses and diseases at the same time. With its classic 8-bit graphics, our game, “Sergeant T-Cell and the Abnormally Impressive Invasion of Illnesses”, takes a creative twist on the classic tower defense game, and is placed in an imaginative setting wherein our immune system and antibodies are conceptualized as towers whose sole purpose is to defend our body against the unrelenting waves of illnesses trying to infect us. Levels are set in various parts of the body, starting in the mouth, then slowly travelling down the body as levels become progressively harder and we encounter new diseases. As you defeat waves, you obtain DNA,, which can be used to upgrade existing towers or build more of them. Once you defeat the level, you are also rewarded with DNA that can be used to unlock new towers for future levels. However, not only can you obtain DNA from playing the game, but in-app purchases are also available, the proceeds of which are donated to support frontliners across the globe. What it does: - Covid Tower Defense is a twist on the tower defense game that pits the player (in control of body cells) against various mutant viruses. How I built it: - Built using python, pygame, blood, sweat and tears. Challenges I ran into: Accomplishments that I'm proud of: What I learned: - Don't make a final game in python What's next for Covid Tower Defense: - We hope to develop this further and release it on the Play Store. We also want to make the donations actually work (linked to Paypal etc.) ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/covid-19-map-the-gezer-boys

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - the project is inspired by many covid-19 maps that exist today. What it does: - the program generates a map showing covid-19 cases relative to population count by country in a specific date inputted by the user. What we used: - we built the project in python using the Tkinter module for GUI and folium for the map itself, other than that we used the JSON module to read the geojson files of the map. Challenges we ran into: - one of the main challenges was the map itself, we tried several methods until we settled on using folium, after that, we had some difficulties to read the JSON file and some difficulties in deciding how to display the data on the map. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - our proudest accomplishment is the fact that this is our first time using most of the modules in the project and we learned how to use them relatively fast. What we learned: - we learned a lot about the new modules we used and we usually don't code together so it's another thing we learned in the process \nWhat's next for covid-19 map\nin the future, we would like to make it into a website with a timeline slider you can use to move between dates. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/nutrients-and-stuff

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We wanted to help users diet and stick to their budget by allowing users to take pictures of their meals to track dietary goals. What it does: - Our current implementation uses the google cloud Vision API to tag images of food, then searches the USDA nutrient database to find information on carbs, calories, fat, etc. for the food. How I built it: - We used many different tools, we started with python, bigquery, and cloud Dataprep. Then we decided to try a JS app with firebase and a rails app on app engine with the cloud vision gem. Challenges I ran into: - Our biggest challenge was in trying to use the vision API clients. We found that the vision api for firebase and the vision gem for ruby were difficult to understand from the documentation. The python library for the vision API was the easiest to use so we settled on that, but when trying to wrap our functions in Cloud Functions we ran into issues in setting up the routing tables for Cloud Functions endpoints. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - We are proud we tried and learned so many different services and libraries on google cloud. We think this knowledge will make us much better hackers in future projects. What I learned: - We learned about google cloud SQL, App Engine, Dataprep, Bigquery, Cloud Functions, Vision API, and even the Natural Language API (to remove irrelevant terms from the object tags). What's next for Nutrients and Stuff: - We hope to use our knowledge of google cloud in future hackathons to better achieve our goals in the limited time as well as apply our knowledge to the workplace. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/cansorter

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Why do people not recycle even though the garbage cans always have clear labels? Because it takes time to read it. Every time I stop by a garbage can, I spend a long time deciding which type of garbage my bubble tea cup is. Is it waste or can it be recycled? We decided to solve this problem by allowing people to leave the garbage and just forget about it. What it does: - Our CanSorter sorts the types of waste using image recognition, which means that all you have to do is leave the garbage in the garbage can, and the garbage will go into the appropriate section automatically! How we built it: - We built this device by first training our own model using keras to recognize cans/bottles, or regular garbage. We detect when a garbage is inputted using the motion sensor, if a motion is detected, a signal is sent to the IBM Cloudant using mbed c++ code. After the IBM Cloudant receives the message, we use the a javascript script to open up our pc web cam to take a picture, analyze it with our keras model, and return a character based on whether or not it is a bottle. The cellular IoT Nucleo board then receives the signal and acts on it. Using relays to amplify our motor power, we were able to send the amplified signal to the motor to push the garbage to the appropriate section. Challenges we ran into: - One of the main challenges we ran in to is integrating the different parts of the device. We spent a lot of time deciding which interface to use, iOS, Android, etc. But we ended up using webcam because it is the simplest to use given our time constraint. Also, receiving the signal via serial from the cellular IoT device was also difficult as we had no prior experience using the device. Writing the code to send characters and receive and process them was also a difficult task that we could not have done without help as we were not extremely familiar with serial communication and using Cloudant. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We were able to get the machine learning model up and running and it actually detects cans. We completed the circuit to push the can to the appropriate section and we learned a lot about using cloud services and IoT technology. What's next for CanSorter: - We plan to sort even more categories of garbage in the future as garbage comes in many types, not just two, and also implement the same sorting technology in other fields. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/inconnect

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We all know those people having trouble sharing their health conditions. They need to connect with someone who can share their feelings and give them the right advice. What it does: - Through the facebook messenger chatbot, it connects two users who choose to talk about the same topic(health issues or diseases). It keeps both users private/ How I built it: - We have built a messenger chatbot with python based on django framework. We used facebook developer's documentation to figure out how to send messages to users with chatbot. Then hosted and deployed a server on Heroku to ensure the constant connection and unlimited api requests. Challenges I ran into: - The first challenge that we ran into was the drastic change of the idea that we had already thought about. This changes the course of the hackathon for us. However, we managed to concentrate, organize, build and make some cosmetic changes too. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - The final product that actually works after 24 hours of non-stop coding.\nAlso the knowledge and the experience that will be immensely useful in the future. What I learned: - We had no previous experience in building the chatbots, so we learned it along the way. What's next for InConnect: - In the future, we can implement natural language processing in chatbot that can identify the topic and automatically connect to other people. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/documind

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Every programmer has one thing in common: it doesn't like to write documentation, tends to postpone the documentation writingprocess and it is always complex for big companies to mantain an high level of documentation across all the projects. However with an increased maturity of hi-tech companies and departements, a need of standardization and monitoring of documentation has appeared. And this is why we havecreated DocuMind. What it does: - Docu Mind is documentation made it easier. In big companies, it is a tool that helps the Documentation Team to have an overview of the documentation status and easily navigate in their projects and is a tool that helps their job. On top, we offer a prioritization feature, which shows which are the methods that need urgent updates in the documentation.\nIn smaller teams and startups, it is used as a visualization tool to underline possible problems and it can be a topic for the weekly scrum, to have an overview of the statusquo of the documentation proces. - Once the repository it is syncronized with Docu Mind, we provide an interactive dashboard that shows easily the current status of the documentation and shows the standardization of it. It is possible to navigate across all your projects and identify important methods which are not currently updated. We offer a solution that can link directly to missing information, or mismatching between the updates of methods and updates of linked documentation. How we built it: - We focused on creating a visualization tool that facilitates the life of the responsible of documentation.\nWe built in Python the back-end to understand what are the potential of the product. At the moment we focused on python repository, given the fact that documentation is often a language-specific task.\nWe used nltk, language_check and path_finder, but we are planning to integrate with more tools to extract more information about documentartion\nWe used sketch to design the dashboard and the interaction with the user.\nWe are in the process of refining the back-end, front-end interaction. Challenges we ran into: - There are several challenges into the documentation process, especially given the different approach of companies to the task. On top, different programming language might have different structures.\nIdentifying pictures and its content appears to be complicate at this stage.\nIn addition it was complicate to identify a consistent score for all the documentation, therefore we focused on a relative-score system for documentation rating. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Our presentation: - We had fun time, while working hard. We made an idea possible and concrete that can help the work of thousands of programmers. We believe that there is a great market potential for the idea, compared to the required time to develop the actual solution. - At the moment it is not fully covered by any startups in a focused way. What we learned: - 1) Avoid the "think, think, think" approach. Instead use the: "think, code, think,code,think". Quick wins and quick solutions are key in obtaining an MVP ready during the hackhaton time constraint. - 2) Make it quick, make it dirty: don't focus in building the ideal product, but simplify in manageble tasks in order to be able to show that your vision is feasible. - 3) Break down the project in tasks from the beginning. What's next for Documind: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/docit

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The loop over issue tickets, code changes, tests, test results normally is in sync. The end user documentation often is not in sync with this loop. There should be methods and tools to change that. What it does: - The current code just sketches one approach for one part of the problem. - But the person in charge of keeping the end user documentation in sync gets a report about - One shortcoming is, that remote files currently ars shown as tmp files. That can be fixed with more work.\nUnchanged features are not reported as that would be a waste of time. If wanted taht can be changed with more work. - The idea used is to (mis)use git difftool -y --extcmd /path/to/customDiffToolThatCreatesTheReport not for diffing but for reporting. How I built it: - Shell, Python, git. Challenges I ran into: - Find out about that a external difftool can be used and what parameter values the external difftool gets. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - I'm glad that id some research and found some interesting information. What I learned: - Learning more about git and difftool. What's next for docit: - Think about a usable workflow and start to implement that from scratch. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/moocs-us

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - As machine learning and natural language processing enthusiasts, we decided to build a data-driven application, which could help students like us. We love MOOCS, and we wanted to build something new and challenging with it. How it works: - We use some machine learning techniques (Latent Dirichlet allocation) on MOOCS video subtitles (coursera, udacity,...) to generate a map of the knowledge of someone, based on the speech in the MOOCS he saw. Challenges I ran into: - We are not front-end designers, and learning d3.js was a challenge. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - -> Fully usable online application (responsive, fast, beautiful :) ) What I learned: - How to code fast What's next for Moocs.us: - Startup maybe ? ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/calendar-gap

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Sometimes, we just don't have the chance to properly plan our daily schedule, and end up with lots of short breaks. But hey, maybe we're not alone? Why not to reach to your friend who's also free at that time? How it works: - The app allows you to upload you schedule (using icalendar formar) and then matches your plan with those of your friends from facebook. Then, it suggests you possible dates and times for meetings. It also enables you to send a facebook notification (simply poke your fellow!) and start the interaction! What's next for Calendar GAP: - We plan to improve all the features (like location, weather etc.) and publish it. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/melon-op7e51

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We, as a species, are producing more CO2 now than ever before. These emissions need to stop. We created Melon as an easy way for people to track their emissions and make sure they're doing their part in saving the world. Little by little, we can all make a difference. What it does: - Melon gives you fast and accurate data on companies and their practices. Instantly find out a company's energy sources and their treatment of workers. - Melon also puts you in charge of your consumption and emissions. Intelligently track your goals to help make the world a better place. Want to cut down on meat so that you contribute less to methane emissions? Melon makes it easy to track that. Feel like using the bike instead of the car from now on? Melon has you covered. - Melon also provides an emissions calculator to inform you about your total emissions in a journey. It has walking, cycling, bus, car, train, and cruise ship as transport options. - Melon allows you to achieve your environment-conscious goals in your own way. How we built it: - We used Python to get our project up and running as fast as possible. - For the server backend, we use Flask with the Jinja2 templating engine. We use SQLite for the database that holds all user data and company data. Of course, we want to keep users' accounts safe so we use Passlib with the bcrypt algorithm to hash passwords. - For the frontend we use HTML and CSS for the webpages, as well as JavaScript for interactivity. We use Bootstrap to create responsive pages. For ease of use and browser compatibility, we used the jQuery library for some functionality. - For the CO2 emissions calculator, we used geopy and OpenStreetMap to get world locations and to calculate the distance. We then researched data for different modes of transport to give accurate values on CO2 emissions. - We want to make sure that everything goes smoothly, so we use Mypy for statically type checking our codebase. We used GitHub Actions to create a build pipeline that allowed us to automate our type checking process on every push. Challenges we ran into: - Getting everyone up to speed with Git and GitHub wasn't an issue, but we did end up with a branching model that wasn't too tidy. For a Hackathon, this is fine because it's all about getting stuff done as quickly as possible, but looking at the commit history on the repo does require time. If we continue working on this in the future, we'd like to do a rebase of the repository so far in order to create a better commit reading experience. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We're quite proud of how quickly we were able to mesh together and collaborate on something we all wanted to work on. From the brainstorming phase to the UI design to the programming, we were all able to cooperate on the project. - We were able to pitch ideas to each other without worrying about "being wrong", which helped us iterate through our ideas quickly. It was a very supportive environment where we were all able to contribute to the team. - Our planning and coordination was also really on-point, because we used GitHub Projects (similar to Trello) to assign tasks to each other. Everyone knew what they had to do, and we all took the initiative to get started on a new task if we were finished. What we learned: - We learned a lot about effective branching in Git, as well as learning new technologies. Not all of us were completely familiar with Flask, Jinja, Passlib, or Bootstrap, so we were able to teach each other how to use these frameworks in a collaborative way. What's next for Melon: - We weren't able to add automatic CO2 emissions tracking from driving, but we want to explore this idea further if possible. One possible extension would be to use the user's number plate to get information about their car to calculate the CO2 emissions more accurately. - If we had more time, we would've also added real data on real companies, but unfortunately during such tight time restrictions it made more sense to make up fake companies. - We also want to create a mobile app for Melon so it's even more accessible, however due to time constraints this wasn't possible so this will have to be completed at a later date. - We think that this idea has potential and we want to improve it even more. While we may need to refactor some parts of the codebase, we really want to add useful features like car tracking. Google Slides presentation: - For more information like proposed marketing and monetisation details, view our presentation here: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/ecopal

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The theme for this event focused on five of the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals. Of these, our team decided to focus on ‘Goal 12: Responsible Consumption and Production’. This issue is seen across many countries, including the United Kingdom (UK). Statistics show that UK households produced just under 27 million tonnes of waste in 2017, and the UK’s recycling rate for Waste from Households (WfH) was 45.0% in 2018. These demonstrate an opportunity to help households both reduce and recycle waste. What it does: - EcoPal is a system that advises users on how to become sustainable consumers, focusing on the principles of reduce, reuse, and recycle. It includes the following sections and features:\n• Reduce\no Provides advice on how the user can reduce the amount of waste they produce.\n• Reuse\no Suggests fun activities that utilise waste and unwanted items, helping younger audiences engage with and understand sustainability.\no Locates nearby charities and informs users of the items they accept.\n• Recycle\no Advises users of the types of waste that can be recycled in their districts.\no Locates nearby recycling centres and informs users of the types of waste they accept. How we built it: - The system was built within Python. GitHub was utilised to help team members collaborate. Challenges we ran into: - • Implementing Google API to deal with google map searches.\n• Using excel as a database as we were unfamiliar with it.\n• Merging different functions created by different people together. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - • Successfully developing a prototype system based upon a concept idea within a short time span. \n• Including every member of the team regardless of their level. What we learned: - • How to plan a project.\n• How to collaborate as a team.\n• How to manage workload across multiple people.\n• Applying people to tasks with relevant skills.\n• Implementing Google Maps into our python project.\n• Good communication within a team.\n• Using Microsoft Excel as a database. What's next for EcoPal: - The finalised product would take the form of a mobile app. This would be available from the Google Play and Apple stores. According to Statista, the percentage of households in the UK with a mobile phone between 2017-18 was 95%. Based on this, it should be easily accessible to the general populace. - Additional features to be added include:\n• Reduce\no Helps users identify whether a product is sustainable and suggests alternatives if necessary.\no Signposts to helpful resources, such as blogs.\n• Reuse\no Offers a platform for users to trade unwanted items. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/galactic-defenderz

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - To never give up. What it does: - Entertains People How I built it: - Using python and web templates Challenges I ran into: - lack of water and object organization Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - the game that we made What I learned: - to program for long periods of time What's next for Galactic Defenderz: - It's on our website ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/map-maker

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Video games What it does: - Customizable maps for scalable packages How I built it: - Using frameworks such as Libgdx Challenges I ran into: - Creating my own GUI system Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - Making a strong self standing application What I learned: - Many shortcuts in object orientated programming What's next for Map Maker: - A lot more content, rewriting of code ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/deeaudio-spk89q

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: DeeAudio: - Go to: ~alisonacross - We let our program do the talking - Users connect on a network directly to each other's machines using IP addresses. The voice-chat was achieved with socket programming. When using DeeAudio, users interact with low latency. - Run both the Listener and Connect GUI files\nSay Sally and Jim want to speak to each other\nFirst Sally will select 'Listen' and wait for Jim to connect. Jim should enter Sally's IP address and press 'Connect'\nNow Jim should select 'Listen' and wait for Sally to connect. Sally should enter Jim's IP address and press 'Connect'\nSally and Jim are now connected and can speak to each other ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/dalek-interface-control-with-pebble-watch

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What we learned: - Transferring, info between different operations system, (Windows, Apple, and Android) and Pebble watch. What's next for Dalek interface: - Information can be adapted for other robotic builds. R2D2, k9, Droid etc.\nFurther interface can be used as a warning system in public spaces and conventions. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/covaid-1t5bnd

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - This web application was created to allow people to transition away from the norms of a covid-ridden world, while still maintaining the security of knowing they are keeping themselves safe and happy, both physically and mentally.\nThere is lots of talk about going back to how life was before the pandemic, but realistically it will never be the same. We need to remember to look after our health and keep a positive mindset no matter what happens. What it does: - covAid is a web app which has several different features. You are first greeted by the welcome page, where you can see all the other elements. \nFirstly, there is a 'chill' tab. In here, you will find a mediation page which gives guided breathing sessions, and a journal page which allows you to create a journal entry and download it to your computer. \nSecondly, there is a discord bot which provides information about world coronavirus cases.\nFinally, there is a real time graph created using Plotly which shows the global covid cases. How we built it: - The Web app was build using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. The discord bot was created using python, and the graph was created using Plotly in JavaScript with jquery. Challenges we ran into: - I had work experience over this weekend, and entered into a few other hackathons meaning I had little time to complete this hack. I had never created such an interactive graph before, nor had I used the platform which I used to make it, so there was quite a steep learning curve as I only has 30 mins to create it! Accomplishments that we're proud of: - I am very proud of the application I created, and am glad that I managed to finish it in time to upload everything before the deadline! What we learned: - I learned how to create interactive graphs, as well as using some advanced javascript to create the breathing meditation function. What's next for covAid: - I hope to increase the 'chill zone' to include games such as tic tac toe or a simple platform. I would also like to make a symptom checker utilising ML. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/road-friction-forecasting

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Machine learning is widely used everywhere, including weather forecasting.\nObservations presented for the competition allowed us to address an important issue of safety on the roads.\nAdditional weather data sources were used: What it does: - The final product is a mathematical model that can be used in a mobile or web application to predict the risk of icing of the road and inform drivers: - \nCheck the fresh weather report \nPut data into the model\nPredict road friction for the next N hours\n How we built it: Challenges we ran into: - The most complicated step was data preprocessing and feature selection. \nFrom the original data, we decided to use only Friction observations as the targets of our model, because public and personal transport are usually not equipped with a set of sensors used to collect the Smart Road Measurements dataset. We want to provide the opportunity to get reliable forecasts based on publicly available data, hourly provided by weather stations. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We discovered the difference between time-series forecasting and time-series classification.\nAlso, we achieved a solid ~76.67% weighted accuracy, which is very impressive for such difficult data and a short period of observations. What we learned: - We have achieved a deep understanding of the mathematical background, tools, and approaches to time-series data.\nI lost part of the code at an early stage of the project, so I received a boost of motivation to automate the routine of backups and version control. I became wiser. - Andrii - I learned about time-series analysis, data preprocessing, dealing with outliers, collection of the relevant real-world datasets, and a unique regression model for the first time and that's my achievement. - Abrar What's next for Road Friction Forecasting: - With a large number of observations and data sources, we can face even more challenging problems. - Demo: - Pandas Profiling Demo: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/iot-led-7fm35c

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - To make life easier so we don't have to get dressed in the dark and can see if the room is free for class calls. What it does: - The Raspberry Pi has a light sensor that turns on an LED when the lights go out to make going to bed easier. It also checks for Bluetooth MAC addresses so it can tell which roommates are in the room and turn the lights on when someone comes back in the dark. The Pi also updates my GitHub pages to show who is in the room to check if coming back to take an online class call would be a good idea. How we built it: - The Pi runs a python program that updates an elephantsql database through Heroku. Challenges we ran into: - General hardware drivers that needed to be re-enabled/installed. It took a while to set up the web page because Heroku has cross-site scripting disabled by default making it difficult for the script on GitHub pages to communicate with it. Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next for IOT LED: - Hooking up a smart outlet to turn on a light that will help us see even more in the dark without annoying our roommates. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/remotepicam

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - While teaching a professor may move around and end up being out of frame What it does: - The RemotePiCam is a moving platform with a mounted camera which uses math and an image stream to ensure that the platform is always oriented towards the face in in front of it How we built it: - We used a Raspberry Pi 3b with 2 PWM Servos, an ArduCAM, and some duck tape. Challenges we ran into: - One of the challenges we ran into was when we found out that the bandwidth and latency constraints on uploading an image stream to an MQTT broker prevented us from obtaining a usable system. To solve this problem we switched from uploading images to the broker to uploading small bounding box coordinates. - We also ran into problems tuning the product so that it behaved the way we wanted it to. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are proud of how well we have tuned the product. It is very accurate What we learned: - We learned that tuning takes time, and became much more familiar with python virtual environments. What's next for RemotePiCam: - Up next for the RemotePiCam is to add interactiveability so that a user can use the product as a remote laser pointer. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/goose-alert-n1acuy

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Looking and reading about the increasing number of Goose attacks, we decided to make and deploy this website. This would allow people to stay connected and stay up to date with the number of geese in their area. What it does: - We all know how vicious geese are. We all know how scary their hisses can be. When they bob their heads towards you, that's how you know that bite is coming. But with Goose Alert, they won't even have the chance to touch you, because you'll be out of their way, and on the best path to getting where you need to be. - This website has 4 pages: the introductory page, login page, register page and the messages page. Once the user logs into their account, the user can select any one of the four areas stated there. If a user notices geese in their area, the user can report it by messaging in the particular group for that area about the goose/geese. Hence, it would help people stay connected. How we built it: - We built it using HTML, CSS, JavaScript, some Bootstrap, Python Flask, Socket.IO and MySQL. This website is deployed on Heroku. Feel free to check out the site yourself using the link below. Challenges we ran into: - Some challenges we ran into were: Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We're proud to make a website that would help solve such an important problem in today's world, and especially one that is a cause so close to our hearts: the Waterloo geese. What we learned: - We learned to use Flask and Socket.IO, and learned how to combine and link HTML, CSS, JavaScript, some Bootstrap, and MySql with Flask and Socket.IO to make a fully functional website that solves the issue we set out to solve. What's next for Goose-Alert: - This project can be extended to many more locations. Additionally, we could have people report locations of goose sightings that are visible on a map to make it more visual, rather than text-based. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/goose-genocide

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Submission for the SE26 mini-hackathon!: Made on Python terminal and "turtle" library: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/pi-o-t

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - During the Covid-19 pandemic, there has been a rising interest in farming, especially urban farming like hydroponics. We thought that how can we complement and improve on the existing products/technologies and support the farmers better as well as connecting the farmers together. Hence, we thought that we can leverage IoT to make farming easier and more convenient. What it does: - Our project automates crop health surveillance, provides users instructions and guides to care for plants, suggests users the farming supplies to get, compares purchasing price quotation from at least 3 different suppliers during sourcing process (Through partnering with TenderBoard), and implements a farm calculator plugin to calculate carbon emissions and carbon sequestration (Farm carbon calculator). How we built it: - We reused object detection code from one of our teammates and tailored it to suit this project. Challenges we ran into: - We wanted to solve many problems initially, but after feedback, we had to narrow our scope and focus from 3 SDGs to 2 SDGs. Another challenge was finding a product-market fit. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Within the span of one day, we were able to clarify a lot of things and ideas in our project. What we learned: - We understood the needs of farming customers better. We also learnt how to use the various business models from Pitchspot to analyse the market situation better. Furthermore, we get to improve on our project building skills by identifying problems and coming up with solutions as well as working together along with one another. We also improved our presentation skills by presenting to the various mentors and judges on Airmeet and applying their feedback to our project. What's next for Pi-o-T: - We plan to expand to commercial farming and use VR/AR to teach farming in schools, include a variety of crops, and include a reward system to retain customer loyalty. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/premcoin

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - I wanted to make my own cryptocurrency, mostly as a joke and just to learn more about using blockchain and decentralized networks. What it does: - Currently, it does not do much. It serves as a ledger that anyone can add any "from", "to", and "amount". After the transaction is requested, computers have to _ mine _ blocks to add the transactions to the blockchain. My program _ theoretically _ works as a P2P network, meaning other computers can run the server program and contribute to the same blockchain, but I am not so sure that works as of now. How I built it: - I followed multiple tutorials about creating a blockchain and P2P(peer-to-peer) networks in Python. - The blockchain acts as a linked list of blocks that store transactions as data and cryptographically secure hashes to prevent the blockchain from being rewritten. The blockchain and other information was accessible through a webpage. Peers can access the necessary information to get the blockchain and necessary information to contribute to the network. Once a block is mined and transactions go through, each node broadcasts the block's information so other nodes add the block to the blockchain. Challenges I ran into: - Going into this project, I was not familiar with how blockchain worked, or how to use flask to make dynamic websites. It was a struggle understanding the concepts before implementing them. I implemented a similar _ proof-of-work _ algorithm as Bitcoin and Hashcash where each user has to find some value that, when hashed, returns a hash less than some value. The largest challenge was trying to create a wallet. Bitcoin uses ECC (Elliptic-curve cryptography) to verify users, but I could not implement that while I was working on the project. Maybe someday... Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - I can run a program that has some semblance of a working cryptocurrency. Yay. What I learned: - I learned about how blockchain is supposed to work and how it can be applied, as well as how cryptocurrencies can be used and mined. I also gained experience working with flask to create a dynamic website. What's next for PremCoin: - Eventually, I will add a login with wallets that use public-private key pairs for verification so that transactions are actually recorded and meaningful. I will also add some reward for people that mine blocks. After that, making sure that the P2P aspect works is important for being decentralized. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/soton-analytica

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We are severely affected by the new european law that is know as GDPR and we decided that we wanted to educate people so that they don't have to go through the same problems What it does: - Provides an interactive GDPR-themed gaming experience that everyone in the audience can participate in by connecting on their phones. How we built it: - Using a pygame display, with a postgresql / flask server collecting requests sent by javascript user clients. Challenges we ran into: - Mainly getting all the different software components to interact with each other, and making the amount of art and content required for a truly polished experience. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Having created truly enjoyable experience with lots of particle effects. What we learned: - GDPR is very much needed. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/treety

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Treety offers a multifaceted approach to help improve a city’s sustainability by educating citizens on both the environmental and socio-economic benefits of urban trees. By quantifying the various benefits of trees and allowing users to explore, visualize, and understand the expected benefits of new trees in user specified locations via a simple map, Treety helps users (citizens and policy makers) understand the various benefits and better plan for urban trees. Treety also provides an interactive web-based UI for planting new trees, integrated with the “Free Tree Program” currently offered by the City of San Diego to their residents. What it does: - The Treety application collects data from smart city sensors (CityIQ) and other potential data sources to build a model of the impact of trees at specific geographic locations. Treety provides a hierarchy of visualizations for conveying the potential benefits (e.g. pedestrians, traffic and carbon emissions over time) of specific trees at specific locations in the city to both San Diego residents and policymakers. By assisting the city with incentivizing the development of urban trees, Treety helps reduce San Diego’s carbon emissions, revitalize neighborhoods by increasing business revenue, and make neighborhoods more pedestrian-friendly by providing shade for pedestrians and reducing traffic accidents. - Our application addresses the “Urban Challenge” broadly because it aims to improve many of the different aspects of life in San Diego. The aim of Treety is also to create a bridge between San Diego lawmakers and citizens to tackle the urban canopy challenge together. In sum, Treety helps to educate residents about the beneficial impacts of local trees in San Diego and the ability for residents to help plant their own trees. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/locatr

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - It all starts with our status as self-proclaimed news junkies. The truth about new in America-- you can never find your own. Consumers get mass media, multimedia, but they never end up getting personalized media. Every single piece of news is provided through these large corporations and their products, giving more and more bias. Even worse, there doesn’t exist anything to provide news for edification - news dedicated to gaining knowledge, not just to provide a status update on a obscure concept. That’s why we decided to make Locatr, a solution to locate all types of news - specific to the consumer. What it does: - Locatr is a web app for consumer-based news. It takes New York Times articles, but current and historic, and it aggregates them into one database, with relevant information in fourteen categories: . The user, through interaction with the web page, answers a multiple choice questionnaire and also provides a brief response about their day. Both the New York Times articles and the user responses are analyzed. The user is then provided with the articles that are similar and dissimilar to their tastes and the user is also shown their traits through a visual depiction. How we built it: - We used a python script to use Indico’s Machine Learning APIs to analyze the results we found through the New York Times API.These results were then cleaned up through python and sorted. This individualized analysis for over 5000 articles is pushed to a SQL database that is on a localhost using XAMPP. The user takes a Javascript multiple choice test to create a paragraph, and they are encouraged to add some sentences to the paragraph afterward. This paragraph is analyzed using the same API and then the results are compared using PHP to find the most similar articles given who they are. A custom chart is also displayed for the user to see the results of their test. The UI is created through the use of HTML, CSS, Skeleton, and Javascript, which allows for responsive design and effective front-end to back-end integration. Challenges we ran into: - One of the largest drawbacks of our approach (to take multiple APIs and utilize them) was that the API’s all had their respective limitations that would just compound with the limitations of others. These limitations naturally existed in the systems that we wanted to use. For example, the language analysis API could not take the calls at the rapid pace we wanted, so we had to loop the python script. Even then, we had to toy with it for a considerable amount of time to allow us to take full advantage of the features. The NYT API left us in a similar situation, due to the fact that we wanted to pull older results that quite simply were no longer on the New York Times site, and we had no way of knowing initially.The single most noticeable issue was that we were unable to pull all the results that we wanted to, and instead we had to settle for 5000 when we had hoped to allow more news articles to ensure a better success rate. We take pride in the fact that we were able to use all of these tools, and their respective limitations, in conjunction and have a complete and functional project. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are the most proud of the emphasis on detail throughout the assignment, as well as the overall organic qualities we were able to place into the project. It really starts and ends with detail, through the rainbow on the first page ensuring that it doesn’t turn yellow, all the way to the incredibly precise values for the traits. Even the design is detail oriented, with a consistent color scheme and moving points that cannot collide. The organic qualities were also stressed, and this was done through ensuring that each multiple choice answer had two similar sentences as options to place into the master paragraph. This ensures that there is no repetition and sentiment is allowed, and it also reflects the fact that everyone in the world does not approach an issue in the same way. We are also incredibly proud of the final, finish product- from the PHP to the SQL to even the HTML- we proved ourselves very capable of large scale projects through the work that just two of us were able to complete in under 24 hours. What we learned: - We learned to be resilient above all. We had multiple failed attempts, especially in the case of pushing the information to the database. Despite this, we persisted. We had nearly 5000 different items to collect 14 parameters for, and despite the variation that was bound to be present, we were able to make a cogent code that could handle large variations. We also learned to value the. What's next for Locatr: - Further integration and more and more results. With the endless amounts of news that come out on a daily basis, we are firm believers in the fact that we will never have enough results. This is what drives us to continue, to push forward. It is a worthy cause, and Locatr, as created at Hackean, is just the first step. We hope to expand Locatr to allow for more parameters, to allow for more daya, and also to improve the hacker experience. Locatr right now is almost like a foundation, and now we can begin to construct the rest. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/uabthehack

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - A fellow who loves the pineapple pizza. What it does: - It greatly helps avoiding traumatic experiences such as eating a pineapple pizza. How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: - We learned how to use the clarifi API, also to program a REST API with flask and pipeline images between APIs. To deploy it we used Heroku and we tryed to register a domain without luck. What's next for PineappleAlert: - Expanding the range of detection. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/polygraphcv

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - After watching the movie, 'Blade Runner,' and seeing the device they use to detect emotional responses from the humans and their replicants (genetically engineered laborers) to better tell them apart, I got the inspiration to develop a polygraph machine for humans that operates via a webcam. What it does: - The application detects a user's heart rate visually via a webcam and, along with other sensors, displays metrics relating to a user's stress level. The application can also be simultaneously used as a medical device because of the metrics it is measuring, much like the healthcare robot 'Baymax' from Disney's Big Hero 6. How we built it: Challenges we ran into: - The hardest part was getting everything that should have been working, in theory, to work in practice. Everything from the heart rate algorithm to plotting our metrics in real-time required heavy optimization and testing to work. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Getting a finished product that works reasonably well. It was satisfying to this completed What we learned: What's next for PolygraphCV: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/payroll-calculator-application-a7s29p

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - I wanted to create a application where it is easy to determine the amount of money employees have earned from a week's worth of work at a local part time job. I remember trying to write down the hours, hourly rate and guess tax in order to find out how much Ive earned for a particular week. Now, with this application users can determine this without the headache of trying to find out the amount of taxes as it is considered. What it does: - The application has a simple interface and with your name, hourly rate and number of hours for the week your weekly pay is determined. How I built it: - Language: Python\nLibrary: Tkinter Challenges I ran into: - Creating an GUI with a set of labels and fields was my toughest task in the development of the application. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - Being able to have the application working and quickly determining the weekly pay of an employee with their hourly rate, hours and tax. What I learned: What's next for Payroll Calculator Application: - Being able to consider different sorts of taxes for individuals in different places all around the world. This way any person from around the world who works at a hourly place of employment could use this application and not have to always think about their pay. All they need to know is their name, hours and hourly wage and everything else is taken care of. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/420blastit

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - 3D printing has a many benefits in space, but the amount of training required to model parts is too time consuming. Our goal is to create a user interface that contains a library of parts to print on command, customize, and track. What it does: - printIt provides a library common parts that can be printed on command, inventories materials remaining, the states of printers, and history of use. How we built it: - printIT is a webapp created with angular.js Challenges we ran into: - Creating a solution that benefits both experienced engineers but also can be used by any untrained users. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We have a really cool idea with a lot of potential and we have a great demo. What we learned: - A number of challenges in space that can be solved by 3d printing What's next for printIt: - Fleshing out more features in printIt ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/red-detector

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - While growing up, my grandmother could recognise people only by their voices. She was one of the many millions that had lost their vision to diabetic eye disease. Early diagnosis is essential to the management and prevention of vision loss. It is my desire to use AI learning tools to create solutions that can aid reduce this burden. What it does: - It detects the different stages of Diabetic eye disease from mild to severe currently with 74% accuracy. How we built it: - We used transfer learning, taking advantage of one of the recent convolutional neural networks EfficientNet. Due to the constraint of time and computation, the algorithm was trained on a small sample. We used data from link the images were preprocessed by applying gausian filters and also transformations like resizing, zooming in, width and height shifting. After training for a few times and doing random hyperparameter tuning, The best accuracy was 74%. Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We were able to train a model and deploy it using streamlit.\nWe got a good accuracy that can serve as a baseline model.\nApplying our knowledge of AI to offer practical solutions. What we learned: - New tools like streamlit,\nteam work and \nperseverance What's next for DED Detector: - Train on a larger dataset.\nTrain to detect other eye conditions as well\nApply object detection and localisation to detect specific abnormalities ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/moodfluent

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The key inspirations for our projects came from our lived experiences of living with mental ill-health as well as frustration regarding the state of current offerings for wellbeing apps. Alongside this, we were also acutely aware of the fiscal costs of mental ill-health, as explored below. - Mental ill-health is a growing cause for concern in the UK and beyond, especially given the predicted rise in mental health concerns following the COVID-19 pandemic. Indeed, statistics from 2019 show that stress and mental ill-health accounted for 66% of all short-term work absences, and that in the same year, mental ill-health was the number one cause of long-term work absences. - Alongside negative consequences for individuals, poor mental wellbeing has significant effects on both the economy and the health system at large. Sticking with our figures from 2019, stress-related illnesses (including other mental health conditions) accounted for a whopping 68,897,000 GP appointments across the UK. In total, healthcare expenditure related to stress and mental ill-health in 2019 reached $14.76 billion USD, which is equivalent to £10.66 billion. - For those who wish to take steps to improve their mental wellbeing using mobile applications, however, there are some significant issues. Firstly, the market for general mental wellbeing apps is saturated with sub-par solutions which often only have a single feature per application. There are few apps that effectively combine existing technologies into one, simple to use solution that does not require the user to self-import extensive information. Indeed, there are even fewer apps that utilise augmented reality, despite the large (and growing) body of evidence as to its benefits in facilitating mental health interventions. - These ideas are best contextualised through the eyes of Sandra - a persona created based on our past experiences as a team. Sandra has been feeling down lately, and the pressure at work certainly isn’t helping. She knows there are plenty of wellbeing apps out there, so she downloads a few on her phone to try. However, Sandra soon gets frustrated with each app as she can’t find one with the right combination of features for her. She either has to journal in one app and then do breathing exercises in another, or the other way around. On top of this, she doesn’t like the mood rating system that many apps force her to use as it makes her feel uncomfortable to examine her own mental state in such detail. She’s so overwhelmed, she’s not sure could effectively rate her mood anyway! What it does: - Moodfluent is a patient-led app aimed at users with no serious mental health conditions, who simply want to keep on top of their wellbeing - whether that be long-term, or just during a rough patch. It uses natural language processing to determine the user’s mood from their journal entries. When the system detects possible low mood, it guides users to complete mindfulness activities in an AR environment. - Quite simply, there is nothing like our solution already on the market. Yes, digital mood diaries and journals are available - but these force the user to input their mood using either numbers, scales, or pictograms. Similarly, there are many mindfulness apps, but only one - Healium - utilises AR technology. Even then, Healium is simply impractical for many users as it relies on external input from devices such as an EEG headband or Apple Smartwatch. - A video demonstration can be found here: link How we built it: - Our team is fortunate to incorporate a diverse range of skills from coding to design, and business. Admittedly, with such a wide range of skills (and ideas), it took us some time to decide on a final concept, but this delay was worth it as it meant we gained a thorough understanding of the problem area. To do this we utilised tools such as PICO, SCAMPER, personas, and stakeholder analysis. - Once we had agreed on a final concept, as a team, we very quickly assigned tasks according to our skillset, in order to maximise our time during the 24 hour window. The division of labour was as follows: Challenges we ran into: - Though our team included members that have a thorough understanding of various coding languages, we found that tasks which we estimated to be relatively code free, were not so. In particular, when building our AR solution we very quickly found that a knowledge of Blender and C# was required - this posed a steep learning curve for @feirog as it meant she had to learn a new programming language in a matter of hours! Furthermore, there were some practical difficulties regarding the use of EchoAR, as it appears the system was at times overloaded with users. - Throughout the development of the WebApp, there were many instances where @pthara struggled to transform her code into the desired layout. Merging the sentiment form into the HTML and CSS files also proved difficult as it required @pthara to setup Visual Studio Code, pip, Python, and TensorFlow through the command line, which was a new experience. There were numerous results of “invlaid syntax”, but with perseverance and teamwork we continued to troubleshoot and successfully integrated the files! - When it comes to the NLP model, @nayan100 faced similar issues, as at the beginning, the model inappropriately predicted “joy” and “sadness”. After some tuning of parameters, this problem was mostly resolved but there are still some improvements to be made such as adding in more predictor variables such as keywords and surrounding word tests. - For @ketteridge-lauren, however, the challenges she faced were less about developing new skills or carrying out her tasks, and more related to finding her role within the team. Surprisingly, this is the first hackathon @ketteridge-lauren has attended that actually required technical ability, and she notes that this is something she was unprepared for! That being said, this challenge was one that was easy to conquer, given the kind-hearted nature of everyone on the team. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Alongside our final outcome, as a team we are particularly proud of our persistence through this project, even when things got tough. At times, there was certainly some banging of heads against walls - but we still carried on! This meant that we could deploy a relatively polished outcome within 24 hours (which was a crunch). Who couldn’t be proud of that? Who couldn’t be proud of that? Indeed, @nayan100 notes that the level of persistence required to complete the NLP model is one of his proudest achievements in this hackathon. - For @pthara in particular, the fact that she managed to independently create a webpage after only a few weeks experience of HTML and CSS marks a major achievement, and we are all incredibly proud. And as a result of @nayan100’s advice, she can now communicate via the terminal to access repositories, install add-ons, and communicate with programmes. Another amazing achievement! - Similarly, @feirog is particularly proud of how she adapted under pressure to learn animation, echoAR, and Blender. These are all technologies that can be hard to get a grip on regardless of time pressure! What we learned: - Where do we start on this one - there has been so much! - At the heart of things, however, we cannot avoid how much our technical skills as a team have developed over the last 24 hours, as we rose to the challenge of unfamiliar technology. As a result, we have developed initial skills in Blender, C#, and developed are already existing skills in Python, HTML, NLP, design, and business development. Perhaps most importantly, these skills are ones that were not only picked up from developing Moodfluent - as a team, we made a concerted effort to take time to teach each other, even if it were not directly related to our project. In particular, @nayan100 has been a wonderful teacher, allowing the rest of us to get used to git, when it would have probably been easier for him to do it himself. - Alongside these technical skills, our soft skills such as teamwork and collaboration have certainly increased. At the start of this hackathon, we were quite literally strangers to each other, and we now have a solid, working prototype which is testament to our development! What's next for Moodfluent: - Our initial market evaluation revealed a large and volatile space, but most importantly for us, it showed a market that is still open to be cornered. We strongly believe that given our unique combination of features, our solution will be a success - especially if we engage with organisations such as The AHSN Network who can assist with both grant funding and accelerated market access, as well as ORCHA, and NHS digital at an early stage. These relationships will also be vitally important as we look to commercialise our product via a subscription model to both consumers and the wider NHS. - Going forward we would like to engage with key experts in NLP in order ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/word-wall

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Our inspiration to create this program was from English class. Learning is a lifelong journey and we are always trying to improve/expand our vocabularies and learn new words. Keeping track of each new word learned as well as its meaning can be quite difficult. We created this program to allow users to store words along with the meanings of those words. This program made it much easier to keep track of all the new words and was very helpful. We hope that it can help others too! What it does: - This program allows users to input words with their meanings to maintain a dictionary which the user gets to create! The program asks a variety of things including if the user would like to input a new word with its meaning, modify any words/meanings, search for the meaning of a word and also makes sure that there are no errors such as searching for a word that does not exist (it then asks if you would like to add that word to the dictionary) and adding a word that already exists. How we built it: - Using Python 3.8.0, we built our program by starting off with taking inputs from the user. We then made sure that the word(s) given is/are not in the word wall already. Then we added the word with its meaning to a dictionary and assigned them as a key and value pair. (The word being the key and the value being the value.) We then printed the entire dictionary. We then coded the program to ask the user if they would like to search for any specific words. This makes the program easy to use when there are too many words to scroll through and find the meaning. It allows user to find the meaning of the exact word, instantly. We coded it using a for loop which runs for the number of words they would like to find and prints the corresponding meaning to the word. (It finds and prints the value of the required key.) We then proceeded to code the program to ask the user if they would like to modify a word/meaning. The user can say yes and can change the spelling of a word or a meaning of a word. This was done by using a loop in which the new word/meaning is given, the old word/meaning is removed, and the new word/meaning takes the spot. Finally, in the end of the program, we simply printed all the words with their meanings once again. The main concepts we used were for loops, dictionaries, lists, many variables, user input gathering, if statements, and print statements. Challenges we ran into: - The main challenge that we faced as a team was figuring out how we should satisfy the topic of Lifelong Learning. This topic was one that no one on our team had encountered before. Throughout the many events that were held this weekend, we were able to finally understand the topic at a deeper level and Word Wall was the answer we got from it. The other challenges were from creating the code. The team was quite familiar with Python 3.8.0, but there were some concepts that we had to learn while we built the program. One of these being the concept of dictionaries. We knew little about dictionaries, but our group had decided that this would be one of the main concepts that were going to be used in Word Wall. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Some of the accomplishments that our team achieved while going through this experience was extensive. But to highlight a few of our accomplishments, finding out ways to search through a dictionary so we can get the meaning of the inputted word and being able to change the meaning of the word the user had inputted. These accomplishments were weather difficult as our team was quite unfamiliar with python dictionaries. What we learned: - Our team had learned many things throughout this experience. Brampton Library Brainy Hacks has been quite fun and a great endeavour for all of us. During the competition, we learned how to utilize dictionaries in python and how to use if statements and for loops in combination to achieve what we wanted with our code. We also learned many things outside of coding such as how important lifelong learning is and how much it can benefit us in our lives. We found out about elevator pitches and how to efficiently convey our product in just 200 characters through the workshops that were available to us. All around this experience had been a blast for the entire team and we hope to part take in Brainy Hacks next time. What's next for Word Wall: - The next step for Word Wall is to implement a piece of code which allows the dictionary to be saved every time the user opens the file. This would eliminate the need for the user to input all the words and meanings every time that they open the file. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/food-rescue-30lq4p

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We're wondering what to do to help the environment after this Covid-19 until we saw some supermarkets are throwing out rotten food due to this pandemic. What it does: - It helps to reduce food wastage and save our earth by reducing global warming. How we built it: - We used Github as we have learned some basics during the pandemic. Challenges we ran into: - We are still beginners in programming so we had some difficulties while doing this project. And of course, we are also quite busy with our schools' work so we are struggling to take out time to do this project. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - After finished doing this project on time, we really felt relieved and satisfied. What we learned: - We have learned a lot about programming and many more. What's next for Food Rescue: - We will continue to participate more hackathon! ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/roboydance

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - This project is part of HackRoboy#3 and has been done over the course of one weekend What it does: - Music feature extraction and control for Roboy's legs How we built it: - Using Ros messages and RQT ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/go-flood

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: What it does: How I built it: Challenges I ran into: Accomplishments that I'm proud of: What I learned: What's next for Go! Flood: - :) ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/mind-galaga

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - The bot uses computer vision to distill and find the ball, and then simulates keystrokes on a user's laptop to automatically move the paddle How I built it: - The bot uses mss and grabs a portion of the user's screen. Then it finds all countours(intersecting areas of two different colours with different intensities) which aids it in finding the ball and the user's paddle. Once it has the x and y coordinates of those, it references the two and uses the user's keyboard commands to send the paddle to line up with the y coordinates of the ball. Challenges I ran into: - Because everything in the game is white on black, the algorithm had a tough time distinguishing between the objects it needed to track(ball, paddles) and the objects it didn't need to track(score numbers, divider lines). This made the paddle very unpredictable and sometimes undetectable because of the sheer amount of wrong things the script was tracking. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - In order to get past this, I had to implement optical flow to track only the objects in motion. In order to filter down to just the ball, I had to write a series of parameters for each contour to pass in order to be registered as a ball. Parameters such as the contour's density and size of pixels, its position on the screen and the speed at which it was moving. After much trial and error, I made it so that the algorithm tracked only the objects it was supposed to and stored their y positions in a class to be referenced against one another. What I learned: - What I learned is that sometimes, you're not going to have anyone to help you but yourself. When I was struggling with the algroithm tracking the wrong objects, I looked for many alternatives online for detection. Everything from colour detection to haar cascades, but none of them solved my problem. I had to come up with the filtering routine myself and after hours of painful trial and error, it finally worked. There's not always going to be a tutorial or documentation to solve your problem, and being able to resolve issues on your own is the difference between a good hacker and a mediocre one. What's next for Pong bot: - In the future, I'd like to implement an online feature through the use of tools such as google firebase. In essence this would mean that when livestreamed, a script running on a remote device would be able to capture the game screen, run the same algorithm but instead of simulating user keytrokes, it would instead send directional commands to a firebase database which would then be read from by the device running the actual game. This would allow a user to control a game of PONG that's not actually running on their device and would be a massive step towards more interactivity for streaming sites like twitch and YT live. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/rona-a-deep-learning-chatbot-for-covid-19

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - A chatbot is often described as one of the most advanced and promising expressions of interaction between humans and machines. For this reason we wanted to create one in order to become affiliated with Natural Language Processing and Deep-Learning through neural networks. - Due to the current pandemic, we are truly living in an unprecedented time. As the virus' spread continues, it is important for all citizens to stay educated and informed on the pandemic. So, we decided to give back to communities by designing a chatbot named Rona who a user can talk to, and get latest information regarding COVID-19. - (This bot is designed to function similarly to ones used on websites for companies such as Amazon or Microsoft, in which users can interact with the bot to ask questions they would normally ask to a customer service member, although through the power of AI and deep learning, the bot can answer these questions for the customer on it's own) What it does: - Rona answers questions the user has regarding COVID-19. - More specifically, the training data we fed into our feed-forward neural network to train Rona falls under 5 categories: - We also added three more categories of data for Rona to learn, those being greetings, thanks and goodbyes, so the user can have a conversation with Rona which is more human-like. How we built it: - First, we had to create my training data. Commonly referred to as 'intentions', the data we used to train Rona consisted of different phrases that a user could potentially ask. We split up all of my intentions into 7 categories, which we listed above, and these were called 'tags'. Under our sub-branch of tags, we would provide Rona several phrases the user could ask about that tag, and also gave it responses to choose from to answer questions related to that tag. Once the intentions were made, we put this data in a json file for easy access in the rest of the project. - Second, we had to use 3 artificial-intelligence, natural language processing, techniques to process the data, before it was fed into our training model. These were 'bag-of-words', 'tokenization' and 'stemming'. First, bag-of-words is a process which took a phrase, which were all listed under the tags, and created an array of all the words in that phrase, making sure there are no repeats of any words. This array was assigned to an x-variable. A second y-variable delineated which tag this bag-of-words belonged to. After these bags-of-words were created, tokenization was applied through each bag-of-words and split them up even further into individual words, special characters (like @,#,$,etc.) and punctuation. Finally, stemming created a crude heuristic, i.e. it chopped off the ending suffixes of the words (organize and organizes both becomes organ), and replaced the array again with these new elements. These three steps were necessary, because the training model is much more effective when the data is pre-processed in this way, it's most fundamental form. - Next, we made the actual training model. This model was a feed-forward neural network with 2 hidden layers. The first step was to create what are called hyper-parameters, which is a standard procedure for all neural networks. These are variables that can be adjusted by the user to change how accurate you want your data to be. Next, the network began with 3 layers which were linear, and these were the layers which inputted the data which was pre-processed earlier. After, these were passed on into what are called activation functions. Activation functions output a small value for small inputs, and a larger value if its inputs exceed a threshold. If the inputs are large enough, the activation function "fires", otherwise it does nothing. In other words, an activation function is like a gate that checks that an incoming value is greater than a critical number. - The training was completed, and the final saved model was saved into a 'data.pth' file using pytorch's save method. Challenges we ran into: - The most obvious challenge was simply time constraints. We spent most of our time trying to make sure the training model was efficient, and had to search up several different articles and tutorials on the correct methodology and API's to use. Numpy and pytorch were the best ones. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - This was our first deep-learning project so we are very proud of completing at least the basic prototype. Although we were aware of NLP techniques such as stemming and tokenization, this is our first time actually implementing them in action. We have created basic neural nets in the past, but also never a feed-forward one which provides an entire model as its output. What we learned: - We learned a lot about deep learning, neural nets, and how AI is trained for communication in general. This was a big step up for us in Machine Learning. What's next for Rona: Deep Learning Chatbot for COVID-19: - We will definitely improve on this in the future by updating the model, providing a lot more types of questions/data related to COVID-19 for Rona to be trained on, and potentially creating a complete service or platform for users to interact with Rona easily. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/sign-language-detector-vaqust

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: ⚡ Inspiration: ❓ What it does: \ud83d\udcbb How we built it: \ud83d\udcaa Challenges we ran into: \ud83d\ude00 Accomplishments that we're proud of: \ud83d\udd90 What's next for Sign Language Detector: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/learndiscordbots

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Discord What it does: - Teaches you how to make a discord bot How we built it: - We built our website using HTML and CSS in Glitch and designed and programmed our own bots in python. Challenges we ran into: - Setting the bots up to run continuously Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The website and bots, as well as the mission of our initiative. What we learned: - More HTML, Python, and CSS skills, how to make a Discord bot ourselves What's next for LearnDiscordBots: - Adding more bot examples and spreading our reach ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/lineup-qxk6dr

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - As students, especially today, we are more online focused with our learning. Our classes and homework happen to be all online, so why not have our notes also be online? Lineup does just that, with a simple text editor offered online, next to your lecture and homework tabs. - What it does: - Lineup lets the user sign in and link their account to the database, which allows them to access their notes anytime, anywhere. - How we built it: - We built it using Django, Python's webapp framework, and Bulma, a HTML framework that we used for design. - Challenges we ran into: - We ran into trouble getting our user authentication working, and integrate it with the database. We also ran into trouble while trying to hoist our project, and we had to forego that option for timesake. - Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Creating a fully functional web app with Django for the first time was the biggest accomplishment that we found. Learning how to work with Django and creating a website that not only is function, but also as some style to it was the highlight of the weekend. - What's next for Lineup: - What's next is we properly hoist and host our project through a provider and add in more features such as, note sharing through shareable urls, an easy to understand to-do list, and features to add pictures. We hope to also include support for markdown, a lightweight markup language, that lets users format their text in multiple different ways. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/friend-or-toad

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - A pretty big motif in this hackathon/learnathon was frogs!\nWe wanted to build something that would be practical, and also cute and fun like frogs. The cane toad is an invasive species in Australia that kills native species vital to the ecosystem. Many Australians don't know whether a frog is an ordinary native toad, or if it's a deadly cane toad, so many native toads are unnecessarily killed every year, while cane toads escape. What it does: - This uses computer vision, trained on a 90-10 train-test split of images of regular frogs and cane toads, to identify if a given frog is a cane toad or not. It is more or less of a basic, from scratch CNN. How we built it: - We used Keras and OpenCV for the machine learning bit, and used Wix for the frontend, and Flask for the backend. \n Challenges we ran into: - Most of this was new to all members of the team; none of us had much experience in machine learning/computer vision, or working with a backend and API calls. - We didn't know how to connect the python code to a website, so we initially tried AWS Lambda, which was a bit fun, but also didn't seemed to suit our purposes especially given the time frame. Getting anything with triggers working seemed pretty impossible, so we then switched to flask, which was also new to us. - The API's functionality ranges between questionable to dysfunctional, so there's that. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Learning how to use OpenCV was a pretty big one, and how to use images with PIL was really cool! The model also seems to work reasonably well. What we learned: - We learned about how to use OpenCV and Keras! This was our first time working with those libraries. We learned more about backend development and using tools like flask. What's next for Friend or Toad?: - Deployment, and fixing the API stuff, maybe move to a different platform for the frontend. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/qr-connect

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - My first week of college involved meeting lots and lots of new people. Exchanging contact information with everyone was a pain. The only quick way to exchange a means of communication was Snapchat; Snapchat has a QR code that can be scanned to quickly send a friend request to another person. That got me thinking "if only there were something this simple for exchanging phone numbers." What it does: - QR Connect is a quick way of exchanging contact information with others. Simply select what information you want to share and then generate a QR code with the push of a button. Another person can scan the QR code in the app, and it will create a new contact with the person's shared information How I built it: - The Kivy package in Python streamlined the entire GUI. As for handling the QR codes, the qrcode Python package was used. Challenges I ran into: - The Kivy package for GUIs almost has its own language built-in, so there was a learning curve with it. Also, the API for integrating the app directly with an API for Android devices was written in Java, so had I done more research into packages I could use for the project before beginning the code, I would have written it entirely in Java instead of Python. Using the camera to scan a QR code and show it on the screen is difficult; Kivy seems to be somewhat ill-equipt to work with live camera footage, and it also doesn't help that I can't get live camera footage in the first place without connecting it to the Android API Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - The GUI was surprisingly fun to create and figure out from scratch. I would love to make it look a bit nicer, but for something developed in less than 24 hours, I think it looks pretty nice. What I learned: - GUIs can be a bit harder to develop than I expected; I think I completely lucked out that Kivy exists and I found it. It simplified tons of the code for me, which gave me lots of extra time to figure out how to use and integrate the QR codes What's next for QR Connect: - I have two main things on my mind for continuing this project: - \nInvestigating the QR code generation. Currently, it seems that the QR code is always the same when the generate button is pressed. I want to be sure if this is a bug or not, and if it is, then I need to fix it\nProperly implementing QR code scanning\nConnecting the app to the Android API to actually make the app capable of what I set out to have it do. \nAs it stands, this is more of a proof of concept than a finished app, as a few main features are either missing or potentially bugged.\n ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/mind-install

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration:: What it does: Explore a bunch of interesting ideas for the given problem staatement: How I built it: Using pytorch and tensorflow (python): Challenges I ran into: Prioritizing models with potential, cleaning data and working with sparse data: Accomplishments that I'm proud of: Coming up with research level novelties: What I learned: Implementation of NLP models to real world problems: What's next for mind-install: Hopefully another Hackathon XD: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/skai-competitions

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: What it does: - Solves the problems that were given as a part of a hackathon How I built it: Challenges I ran into: Accomplishments that I'm proud of: What I learned: What's next for SKAI Competitions: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/the-automatic-task-scheduler

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Our group found it difficult to focus on school when studying from home, so we wanted to automate scheduling in our school tasks What it does: - The Automatic Scheduler Program takes tasks and schedules them into the user's Google Calendar based on priority of the task How I built it: - We used Python and the Google Calendar API. We also applied agile methodology to work in 2 separate sprints Challenges I ran into: - We aren't sure how to deploy our program onto the web and we ran into some challenges working with OAuth protocol Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - This was the first time we worked with a designing a GUI and using API's What I learned: - We learned a lot of new programming tools and how to better communicators What's next for The Automatic Task Scheduler: - \nSystem learns from User to create better required study time equation\nImproved UI design\nOptimizing algorithms to improve efficieny and space\nDeploying the program online so that program is more easily accessable \n ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/food-objective-of-deriving-interpretive-elo-foodie

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We were inspired by our love of BC food. Especially Mac <3 What it does: - It compiles a list of foods at BC and ranks them based on people's preferences How we built it: - we built it using python Challenges we ran into: - we ran into the challenge of classes, as we are pretty unfamiliar with them as rookies <3 Accomplishments that we're proud of: - proud of a working product that does something What we learned: - data import and export\nhow to use classes\ncomplex ranking systems within code What's next for Food Objective Of Deriving Interpretive Elo (Foodie): - drawing data from the BC website, easier to use interface ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/e-paper-library

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - I randomly bought an e-paper display, and wanted to learn how to use it, so I decided to write a python library for Raspebrry Pi to make use of some of its features. Being an e-paper display - and a cheap one at that - the refresh rate is rather slow (around 7 seconds) which makes application an important consideration in how to use it. The application must be something which does not have a high refresh rate, and which holds the same image on the screen for a long time. The three applications I came up with were graphing/data logging, e-reader, and train schedule. What it does: - Train Schedule\nThis utility pulls data from the MBTA real-time API to display the upcoming trains for a specified station. The user can specify the location, and the program will pull the upcoming trains in both directions and then list the direction of the train and how much time until that train departs. A separate class was written for this, called mbta, which holds all the methods to interact with the real-time API. - Graphing\nThe graphing utility gives the users a few choices on how to display data. There are three choices: scatter plot, line plot, and bar graph. Two arrays are input into any of these choices, the x-coordinates and the y-coordinates. A title and axes label can be added to the graph in a similar way to matplotlib or Matlab. The program will automatically scale the data to fit on the available screen space, and will label the axes with the scaled values. - E-Reader\nA string can be input to the program to be displayed on the e-paper screen. It will be split up into lines which can fit across the screen, and also by how many lines can fit per page. At the bottom of the screen a simple UI is shown which tells the user which page they are on out of the max number of pages. The physical buttons on the bottom of the screen are used to change the page, reaching a hard stop at the first and last page. In the future this could be a good area to build upon, being able to load files and also have more rich formatting on the screen such as italics, bold, and others. How I built it: - Waveshare, the company who makes this e-paper display, provides a simple library to write frame buffers to the display. To use the display, I had to draw these frame buffers. This was done using the Python Imaging Library (PIL) to draw images from combinations of lines, rectangles, and text. I created a class to hold all of the eink methods and properties which greatly simplified the usage of the library. What's next for E-paper Library: - There are a ton of other applications possible for this project which could be explored in the future. It could be a great stock tracker, cryptocurrency tracker, or a data logger for temperature or light just to name a few. The library makes it easy to build upon, so the possibilities are only limited by creativity! ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/wireless-club-spring-2018-hackathon

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - i forget people's names and i know i'm not the only one. What it does: How I built it: Challenges I ran into: Accomplishments that I'm proud of: What I learned: What's next for wireless-club-spring-2018-hackathon: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/meet-me

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: features: what we'd need to build: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/elevate-91zp40

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Hello\ud83d\ude4f\ud83c\udffb, We are here with ELEVATE: - Inspiration: - We have all come across depressions and psychological traumas and it's indeed a part of human emotion. During this pandemic, most of us have been isolated at homes and this is where depressions/traumas nurture and sprout! Thus we bring to you ELEVATE...\nELEVATE is your one-stop location which is an AI-based depression detection system that assists psychiatrists along with psychologists to guide as well as examine their patients with absolute easiness especially during this time of the pandemic. What it does: How we built it: - ELEVATE was created using the following open source projects:\n*[Tailwind CSS UI models] - Front-End Framework\n*[HTML]- Front-End Outline Challenges we ran into: - Making sure that we capture the right expressions are able to transfer the data without delay and store it securely are some of the issues we faced. There are some issues that still exist which we are working on like making the data to be analyzed in real-time so that we don't have to store the data as such. Accomplishments that we're proud of:: - We are proud that we were able to develop a web application that resolves prevalent psychological issues and with the proper resources, we are confident that we can make ELEVATE, an ultimate solution for depressions and psychological traumas. What we learned: - We were able to learn and explore several new project ideas and tech stacks. We were able to implement an AI model that detects and analyses human emotion and submits a report based on even micro-emotions prevalent in the face. Through this project, we were able to innovate, ideate and explore several problems prevalent in society, proving that team effort is the best effort! What's next for Elevate: - For now, we have achieved a facial expression recognition model we can actually start working on the AI models for depression detection from text and voice spectrum of the person speaking. For this we would have to conduct a deeper study as analyzing the voice to detect detection makes use of bilateral LSTM's. Once we achieve this we have 3 models that we have to put together to arrive at a conclusion that will decide the state of the patient. Making all these models work in real-time is yet another mystery left for us to crack. - ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/interesting-name

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - In this time of pandemic when everyone is at their homes, people are slowly losing their social skills and becoming more and more aloof. Spending time alone is cool but too much and we become socially inept. What it does: - This chatbot will talk to you when you have no one else. Although not much it will still reply and continue talking. How we built it: - We have built this bot using Jupyter notebook and Python3 kernel. We have also used tkinter library for the GUI. Challenges we ran into: - Version 1 of the bot was using command line to take inputs and give replies. Integrating into the GUI took some time to figure out. A lot of work went into adding the weather api as well. What we learned: - Using APIs in Python and tkinter library to make simple GUI What's next for Orion Chatbot: - We will try to integrate NLP into this bot to make it more advanced and applicable in a variety of situations. Contributers: - Big Thanks to Subham Bhansali and Satakshi Singh for making this possible :-) ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/gymbud

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Overview of the Project: - \nAn app that will check your body posture while you are doing an exercise and show how accurate the posture is.\n Inspiration: - \nNearly 32.6% of the injuries that happen during workouts and training happen due to incorrect posture. \nWe often neglect the possibility of having a personal coach with ourselves, especially during the lockdown season.\nOur team has the perfect solution to rectify wrong postures during work outs.\n What it does: - Significance of the Project - Objectives we want to achieve How we built it: - Project Timeline - Phase 01 :\nWe started the out with our problem statement and then carried on an ideation train. Discovered a novelty point. Decided on all the features the application can have. - Phase 02 :\nStructured out the framework of the app and made the design for the app in figma. - Phase 03 :\nTrained the ML model using verified postures for the given exercises. - Phase 04 :\nIntegrating all the work packages and finalizing it. \nDeploying the app. Challenges we ran into: - \nThere were several challenges that we faced during the making of an app of this scale.\n\nThe first one was the machine learning model that we had to implement, of all the models available we settled for TensorFlow because of its high performance in CPU mode only.\nThe second challenge was the type of metric that we were going to implement. We decided to go with RMSE due to its low variance and bias.\nThere were several other minor challenges that we faced including the design of our app, but as a team we were able to debug each and every problem\n\n Accomplishments that we're proud of: - *We as a team are proud that we were able to tackle and accomplish the given task assigned in time and also were able to add several other features into the app. - *We have been able to successfully able to precisely predict the a model's accuracy in real time. - *Being college freshers, it's been a humongous task to put together a full stack application in stipulated period of time. What we learned: - The things we learnt and achieved as a team: What's next for GymBud: - We believe that our app GymBud has limitless levels of expansion\nFuture feature implementation includes using sensor to collect data from smart watches\nWe would also like to use one on one ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/homieguard

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Our ideas about the project were initially inspired by our friends’ daily life experiences. During COVID time, most of the students were asked to stay at home and take online courses. For students who were mostly taking their major-specific courses, the course load and the school work make some of them having difficulty in managing their time between living and studying. There is a scenario when you are really busy with your schoolwork, while your roommate does not recognize that and still comes into your room often and bothers you, are you feeling stress and worries? Yes, the homieGuard is meant to be a “watchdog’ that will guard your room at your dorm so check if there is someone right outside of your room. Additionally, it does not have to be roommates, it could also be set up outside of dorms to check the people who walked past by and make sure they don’t take your deliveries. What it does: - Our project was designed to provide people a device to check if there are people coming to their place and also helping them to keep a safe and quiet place to live and study. Specifically, when there is someone present in the camera view, the program will be instructed to take a picture as well as a video recording depends on how long and what do the intruders do. Moreover, there will be emails with pictures as attachments sent to the over of the homieGuard to inform them about their surroundings. How we built it: - The homieGuard is built with a Raspberry Pi 4B, a PIR Motion Sensor, a PiCamera, a few servo motors and a platform on a car to support the motion of the PiCamera, as well as a white LED to show whether there are any intruders coming to the camera view. For the software part, we have mainly used Python as our programming language in terms of face detection, tracking people’s (faces’) movements, take pictures of the intruders, and record a short video that depends on how long would the people in the camera view would act. Challenges we ran into: - We were having problems dealing with the Raspberry Pi connection and setting up the configuration of the PIR Motion Sensor. Setting up the reasonable precise delay time for the PIR Motion Sensor to respond with is difficult as the lagging uncertainty of the sensor itself as well as those coming through the recording is hard to gauge and predict. Additionally, for the face detection portion, our team members spent a long time figuring out how to detect faces of people who are not facing the camera completely and for some who are moving across the camera view. About the face detection portion, we were having trouble producing accurate distance measurements between the face and the camera. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Although the project was said to be around 45 hours, our group only spend about 24 hours on the project starting from the designing stage. Within a short time frame, we were able to make our platform autonomously to track the movement of faces in the camera view. What we learned: - For us as a team, we learned how to be collaborative and make decisions that are after considering everyone's opinions. Individually, we were working on different parts of the project so each of us has learned how to solve some problems. In the specific aspect of controlling the platform, our team has realized that PID control would be a great approach to handle, however, it is difficult and would be impossible to grasp the concepts and use them correctly within such a short time frame. We also learned to use the computer-vision library like OpenCV. What's next for homieGuard: - We think the next step for homieGuard would be to make the car in motion so that it can move around and act like an actual “guardian” of the house. Additionally, in order to penalize the intruders and the stealers a bit. We think we can add something fun to the car such as a spray, noisy buzzer, water drops, very bright LED, and other fun electronic components. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/re-cycle-vl940z

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Sorting through one's recyclables can be a tedious and daunting task, and people can become discouraged and not properly recycle their goods. This automated sorter helps individuals sort through the various kinds of recyclables so that goods are accurately and quickly sorted. Through an easier way to recycle goods in the proper manner, we can help contribute to a greener Earth. What it does: - Semi-automatic sorted recycling using a convolutional neural network via PyTorch and sorter apparatus run from a touchscreen GUI. How we built it: - Utilizing OpenCV and Pytorch we created a convolutional neural network and image processor that can handle code and utilizing AI detect the type of material present. We used a custom data set and loader, to go through our custom training data, to train the neural network, and then used watchdog to detect file updates to check for pictures taken to evaluate through the neural network. The images are taken from a Raspberry Pi camera, and using a touchscreen gui on another raspberry pi we can communicate that another object is coming. Then the mechanism takes the classification of the object from the neural network to determine where to sort it. Challenges we ran into: - One of the main challenges of our project was system communication. We had 3 distinct parts of our project: The sorting apparatus, the camera and machine learning algorithm, and the touchscreen GUI. The raspberry pi that we mounted the touchscreen on serves as the middle-man, receiving instructions from the camera and then serial communicating to the Arduino that operates the apparatus. - When building the AI we struggled to have enough data to train the neural networks. Because of our unique situation, we had to create our own data set of images that were labeled, which was time consuming and difficult, to manipulate the data to work on a limited system. Alongside this, the neural network needed to be portable enough to run on a limited system as well. - In the construction of the apparatus to physically sort the material, we had a difficult time creating a mechanism that was both robust enough to handle material of varying size and weight, lightweight enough to be practical, and easy enough to use that the average person could utilize it. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - A successful classification and detection neural network, that can sort materials. What we learned: - We learned during this project how to utilize OpenCV to process images, and then through a convolutional neural network create an object classification system. What's next for RE: cycle: - We would like to expand the project by making our sorting apparatus more robust by enabling it to deposit trash in 8 separate directions. We also plan to continue training our machine learning algorithm to allow it to recognize more types of trash and increase its accuracy at doing so. As our current design is a prototype we are also planning to create a sturdier 3D-printed facade. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/rpi-pico-rubber-ducky-prank

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The rubber ducky which is commonly shown in films that hackers use to exploit people What it does: - A raspberry pi pico rubber ducky device that will constantly rick roll How we built it: - We used circuitpython to program the raspberry pi pico Challenges we ran into: - We had also planned to include a bluetooth module that would connect to an android device using which the prankster could execute different things. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The final device is a good prank on anyone. Even if the user interferes in the common execution the outcome is always funny. What we learned: - Circuitpython, Adafruit_CircuitPython_HID What's next for RPi Pico Rubber Ducky(Prank): - We will try to work on the bluetooth connectivity and the android application ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/code4covid-xepqmw

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Imagine this. You're standing outside in the freezing cold in the bizarre weather of Canada as an employee at a grocery store or either a nurse at a hospital with the job of checking if consumers/patients have worn their masks to maintain social distancing and are following Covid protocols. To stop employees from freezing, MaskUp does the job of checking if people are wearing their masks properly. What it does: - MaskUp is an application catered towards hospitals, grocery stores, or any small businesses that require masks to be worn. Firstly, on the main page of the app, it has the option for the owners of the product to sign in to the features of the app. Once signed in, the owners would either have the option to view the live stream of the cameras in different locations or the option to view screenshots of people who haven’t worn a mask. (This feature will be talked about later). The app physically can be placed above doors, corridors, and rooms that’ll constantly check each and every individual if they are wearing a mask. If the individual is wearing a mask, it’ll show nothing on the admin page except for the individuals’ face. However, when an individual is not wearing a mask, on the admin page, it’ll show a green box with red boxes covering the mouth signifying that the individual is not wearing a mask. Now, sometimes people like to be counterproductive and argumentative believing what they are doing is correct. This correlates with people who oppose following covid protocols and maintain social distancing. For people like them, our app takes screenshots and stores it in a file which can be retractable at any given point in time which can be used for contract tracing and possibly for legal purposes if the problem escalates. How we built it: - We built the image processing part of our app first, using OpenCV-python. Our image processing algorithm detects faces and then searches for mouths on the detected faces to determine whether or not someone is wearing a mask. If someone is not wearing a mask, the algorithm will automatically take a picture. OpenCV is good for image processing but not good for GUI, so we created our GUI using PyQt5. We created a Qt widget for the video capture and then added it into our Qt application to get everything working. Challenges we ran into: - When building this project we ran into many challenges. The first major challenge we ran into was creating our mask detection algorithm. The original plan was to create our own haarcascade for OpenCV using an online dataset but the data on the dataset was not labelled for OpenCV and we did not have the time to label it ourselves. Our solution was to use a mouth detection algorithm instead of a mask detection algorithm so that we did not have to craete our own haarcascade. Another large challenge we faced was integrating OpenCV with PyQt5. Getting a webcam stream from OpenCV and displaying it in PyQt involved using a separate thread for video capture and the use of a headless OpenCV python package. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - In order for our application to properly transfer all the data from the camera to the admin page, the application would need to be extremely precise in deciding whether a person is actually wearing a mask or not. What we learned: - Throughout the entirety of the hackathon, every individual in the group learned a lot in different ways. From either setting up different python tools such as PyQt5 and PyQt5-Designer, to creating the computer vision aspect of the application which verifies when people are wearing masks or not. What's next for Code4Covid: - In the future, we would like to add the feature of measuring the temperatures of human beings entering the store to further subside the risk of spreading Covid-19 to other people. In general, the more features that are available, the closer MaskUp comes to its goal of completely avoiding any violations of Covid protocols in an enforced work environment. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/healthathome-cq8sdz

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Fake news bombarding computer screens and little resources available to connect to professionals prompted me to think of an all-encompassing application that would enhance connectivity, and in doing so, improve the overall mental health of the users. What it does: - The application serves two purposes: it can be used to connect to an expert and hold discussions about mental health and general wellbeing. It also has a platform where members can post questions about COVID-19 facts, and if those facts are correct or not. How we built it: - I built the application using the web framework Flask. Python seemed like a good choice because of my extensive usage of the language and its ability to support myriad libraries Challenges we ran into: - The biggest challenge I ran into was the time constraint. Having to create everything within a very limited timeframe, I could not come up with perfect solutions for some of the challenges this project presented. In addition, Flask is a technology that is quite new to me so it was challenging albeit fun navigating through this piece of technology and referring to documentation Accomplishments that we're proud of: - I am happy that I was able to create a standalone application using Flask within the timeframe given to us. It would also be extremely thrilling to see someone benefitting from this application! What we learned: - I learned a lot about working within a limited timeframe. I also learned to reach out for help whenever I got stuck. The online community is bursting with experts who are ready and willing to help. Lastly, I learned that the issue of connectivity is much more complex than how it looks on the surface. What's next for HealthAtHome: - After refining the code a bit more, I wish to partner up with professionals who would like to contribute to the app by giving some of their valuable time to any users in need. I would also like to deploy my app after the initial rounds of testing so that people can utilize it as soon as possible. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/whitboard

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What it does: - Allows multiple people to draw on one board and brings people together during these isolated times. How we built it: - Using Python and Pygame What's next for WhitBoard: - Make one WhitBoard board able to connect to different devices ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/all-chess-discord-bot

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Our chess club began moving online earlier this year due to Covid-19, and now operates fully on the web. However, this posed some challenges. In the discord of our Chess Club, getting into games with other players was a very tedious process, which under the pressure of quarantine became more and more important. As the leaders of the chess club, we decided that a bot to remove this friction was the best action plan. What it does: - We created a bot to optimize the chess playing process, making it more efficient, direct and less bureaucratic. Starting a game with another user is now as seamless as a single command! It also provided a number of other commands that allow for practicing one's chess skill to become much better, as well as some other cool stuff. To invite this bot to your Server, go here: How We built it: - We built it using mostly Python. We used packages such as discord.py, requests.py, and python-dotenv.py. We hosted(and continue to host) the bot on Heroku. We also made use of a number of APIs that allowed us to make the bot do cool stuff! Challenges We ran into: - The code base was getting so large, that managing the complexity of the program became severely troublesome. Accomplishments that we’re proud of: - We learned a number of skills that we have been wanting to learn for a while. We explored and learned the massive discord.py library, and even learned of new python syntax! What We Learned: - We learned how to use technologies such as discord.py and results,py. We also learned how to host a bot on Heroku, allowing the bot to stay online constantly. In addition, we learned how to make use of numerous API’s that could give us the data we needed. Most importantly, we learned the use of open source technology in routines that we participate in every day, and how it can be used to constantly improve our lives! What's next for All Chess Discord Bot: - We will now work on refactoring the code, as well as adding more commands that allow for many more use cases! ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/discord-covid-19-predictor-bot

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We were inspired to make to this bot after we started talking about when the coronavirus would end and when we would be able to go back to our original lives. Wanting to have a sense of when this virus would end, we created this bot to hopefully solve that problem. What it does: - Using previous coronavirus data, it predicts the number of cases that we will have tomorrow, and displays data based on that. We wanted to make it a discord bot because we frequently use discord, so it would be easy to pull up the numbers if we were on the app. How I built it: - We coded this discord bot using Python, using the SKLearn and Numpy libraries and made a multiple linear regression model to get our data. Challenges I ran into: - Some challenges that we ran into was figuring how the SKL library worked and how the SKL Library did regression. Understanding the Discord bot API was also a challenge that we had. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - We are proud of making a discord bot, because we have not done something like that this. We are also very proud of learning how the basics of machine learning worked, because we are very new to programming so this was all very new to us. What I learned: - We learned how to do regression modeling, and some of the basics of machine learning. We also learned how the SKLearn and Numpy libraries worked and how the Discord bot API works. What's next for Discord COVID-19 Predictor Bot: - I want to be able to predict the number of cases in different countries and specific states, as our bot only predicts the number of cases for the whole US right now. We also want to use more complicated prediction models in the future because we just started learning about these models and realize that a multiple linear regression test is pretty basic. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/blockhackde

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The blockchain technology has many use cases and has demonstrated its power in a wide range of disciplines. As a team, we intend to explore its utility in the healthcare industry. We therefore dedicated to developing a blockchain and analysis platform for documenting vaccination records. What it does: - Vatican is a blockchain-driven application that keeps track of individuals' vaccine immunization and related health records. As an add-on feature, Vatican leverages a deep learning-based engine for recommending future vaccinations based on patient demographics. How we built it: Challenges we ran into: Accomplishments that we're proud of: What we learned: What's next forvatican: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/short-madlibs-stories-in-python

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: I always loved to do MadLibs stories when I was a kid, so to make some is an interesting and fun experience.: What it does: Let's you fill out 5 quick MadLibs stories for some laughs.: How I built it: I used the Python coding language and used the pyCharm IDE to put it together. The program consists of loops that ask you to input different types of words depending on the story you picked. Then, you can read the story with the words you chose and do another story once you're done.: Challenges I ran into: A couple of grammar mistakes, finding out how to make the program repeat when wanted, the loops breaking on occasion for a multitude of reasons, and making it output what I needed.: Accomplishments that I'm proud of: This is my first time writing a program of this size!: What I learned: How to make a Python project repeat when asked to.: What's next for Short MadLibs Stories in Python: I'm hoping to make it a mobile app one day!: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/3d-tic-tac-toe

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Nice game What it does: - You play tic tac toe How I built it: - python Challenges I ran into: - everything Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - everything What I learned: - not much What's next for 3d-Tic-Tac-Toe: - not much ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/newsrate

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The inspiration for this project came from the fact that we are living in a world with a lot of digital information, and not all of it is true. As engineering students, we were inspired to take the initiative in solving this problem. We depend a lot on online resources, and as a result, run into a lot of articles. We believed it would be helpful to create a website to source and verify the trustworthiness of a certain article. That way we can learn and help others by sharing our experiences about an article on its validity and level of accuracy, and also identify the credentials of who is making the claim about the article in question. What it does: - The website lets users rate news articles for how trustworthy they are and filter ratings for relevant expertise How we built it: - We used a Django framework to host our API and navigate between pages. Using a bootstrap template, we made a decent front end and stored all of our data in a sqlite database. Challenges we ran into: - No one had any web development experience. Not only was this the first hackathon for all the members involved, for most of us, it was also our first time using Github. A big challenge was modifying through Git with the limited bandwidth that some members had. While we communicated with each other effectively, we had to learn a lot of information regarding Git. In addition, one of the members for our team did not show up at all during the Hack-a-thon, so we ended up recruiting another member in his place the next day. This increased the responsibilities of group members significantly. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The site looks great, front end went swimmingly. The concept is intelligent and relevant to the current climate of information verification. Based on the time frame and all the challenges, we are proud that we have a functioning website, as the learning curve was rather steep. What we learned: - We learned how the Django framework works, and how apps use forms to edit member functions. We also learned that the Git command prompt is less buggy for execution of push and pull tasks, compared to doing it through the Git client. We also learned that having good internet is crucial, as the hack-a-thon was virtual. We also learned how to get a website running in Python. Lastly, all of us learned how a hack-a-thon project works for the very first time. What's next for newsRate: - We are looking forward to implementing the ability for the user to search for articles, rate them, and filter them based on a five point scale, where 5 is very credible, and 1 is not credible. The idea is to let people input their ratings based on whether or not they're verified. Verification should be implemented through SMS verification and/or two-factor authentication, including a reCAPTCHA, to stop spammers. We will also include a feature for checking a user's authority on the articles in question. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/smartla

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Having the concept of Smart City widespread is the need of today. Automatic Garbage Collection, Street Parking and Street Light System are few everyday systems which can be conceptualized into smart systems. All the aforementioned systems revolve around the same : communication between the beacon and moving vehicle. What it does: - We are demonstrating one use case today - Smart Parking System. When car gets parked to the spot, they get connected and initiate a transaction after every specific interval of time. How I built it: - Deployed python scripts on server. Web Application for seller and buyer. Challenges I ran into: - Understanding how SDPP works. Modified contracts. Integrated with Web app. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - Understanding of how IOT and BlockChain can be used together to make something which can solve real world issues What I learned: - The combination of IOT and BlockChain technology to resolve parking system issues plus additional smart city concepts and models What's next for SmartLA: - We can deploy the same dashboard for Automatic Garbage Collection and Street Light System. We can extend our use cases of beacon signal. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/edukittigames

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Short Description: - We use KITTI Dataset which contains Lidar data, generated by a data collection vehicle from KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany. First, we tried to preprocess the data on our own by cleaning intensities, reduce dimensions and classes, which went pretty well. Afterwards, we wanted to feed our own CNN/ANN wich processed data. Unfortunately, we were not able to build a working Network on our own by several reasons. \nAfterwards, we decited to shift strategy and use one of the well-known state-of-the-art networks on the KITTI dataset. Unfortunately, Vote3Deep network did not run on our engines because of an unknown error. Due to not finding mandatory packaged despite being installed, VoxelNet did not work as well. \nLater, we could successfully train PointsNet which is based on VoxelNet and achieved an accuracy of about 58%. If we had some more time to train, we could have achieved much better results. - Furthermore, we generated value by an business idea to establish trust of customers to automotive technologies. However, the app will also be usefull in terms of labelling cars, pedestrians and other classes in images. \nWe tried to develop an education platform, where customers can learn about "How the technology is working" but also has the chance to play against the algorithm during a journey in an autonomous driving car. - Link to used PointsNet: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/traliai

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We believe in using technology to make the world a safer place. What it does: - TraLi AI is a faster R-CNN developed to recognize and classify traffic lights. How we built it: - We used a faster R-CNN implementation and built upon it, training the network on the Small Bosch Traffic Light Dataset. Challenges we ran into: - The implementation of the network and using the Bosch Dataset for training purposes. Computing resources and internet connectivity also proved to be very troublesome. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Unwillingness to give up and a joint team effort to achieve the best in a very limited time. What we learned: - How to actually implement a CNN, fine tune it and adjust it to work with the given dataset as part of the challenge. What's next for TraLiAI: - Change the world...by further optimizing and improving the network. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/covivax-sentiment-analyser

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration:Our inspiration stems from the idea of saving resources for our country during the unprecedented times of covid-19.: What it does: It pains us to know that more than a 1000 doses of vaccine are wasted due to the preferential issues of the general public, which is why our app helps hospitals to understand and review the preferences of an individual in a qualitative manner to optimize their use of the vaccine batches, saving the resources for the needful.: How we built it: We built this application using a Kaggle dataset, which was based on the vaccine sentiments of people extracted from twitter tweets. We analyzed the dataset using libraries such as numpy, pandas etc. For the NLP processing, we made use of the tfidf vectorizer and created the model via logistic regression. In the end, we created the UI using a library called PyWebIO, which helped us to create the UI efficiently.: Challenges we ran into: Due to the low computational powers of our computers, we had to think of an alternative route for text processing, and during the creation of our UI, we ran into a lot of system errors and exceptions, which were ultimately solved by our team using out-of-the-box ideas and tricks.: Accomplishments that we're proud of: Working with such a large project, like this, for the first time, our team is especially proud of the way we handled all the errors popping up in our project, and also, learning the new PyWebIO library was especially challenging as none of us were accustomed to the working and syntax of the library. Overall, we are proud of what we've given birth to.: What we learned: We learnt about the new PyWebIO library for generating UIs for our ML model, and we gained deeper insights into the tfidf vectorizer. We were also lucky to learn about various types of exceptions and how to handle them.: What's next for CoviVax Sentiment Analyser: Our app requires a cloud backup, so that any review given by any user can be stored, and hospitals/clinics can use the data to optimize the use of vaccine batches.: ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/npsypr

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The current situation What it does: - Helps students interested in picking up new hobbies connect with teachers. How we built it: - We used Google App Engine and Google Cloud MySQL to host a python app that handles the full backend segment of our application. The Python app uses Flask for its functioning. On the frontend, we used React Native, Formik and Yup using JavaScript. Challenges we ran into: - Several errors regarding cloud connectivity, especially hosting and SQL connectivity. Using incompatible packages in JavaScript slowed down some progress. Using React Native which was a new experience led to some unforeseen errors. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - One of the first functioning apps that we have made. Being new to React Native and Flask and still being able to put up a working application is a proud achievement for us. We also feel that we came up with a slightly novel topic and being able to move ahead with it and arrive at this app was a great feeling. What we learned: - Using flask and http methods was a new learning experience which really helped us learn more about how backend development works. Encountering new errors and debugging them was a challenge, but it left us with valuable knowledge that we'll definitely be using in the long run. What's next for NPSYPR: - We hope to continue exploring tech development and take these experiences with us along the way, getting a little better with every try. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/roomfinder

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Every spring, Duke students receive their room assignment for the coming year. However, the amount of information provided by HRL on the dorms is quite limited, usually only a couple of pictures for each quad or a basic floor plan. As Duke students, we’ve always hoped to see the inside of our future dorm rooms before moving in so we knew what our dorm would look like. What it does: - We wanted to create a way to allow Duke students to help each other see what their upcoming dorm room will look like, as well as share images of their current room to help others. This will be useful for students to plan which belongings to bring for fall move in and will make the transition process to a new room more seamless. How we built it: - For the front-end aspect of our project, we used a template to help build the homepage, but the rest of the tabs within the site were made from scratch using HTML and CSS. On the back-end side, we wrote a simple matching code in Python. Challenges we ran into: - As we are all beginners in web development, it was a little overwhelming at first to try to create something in a short period of time. Because of this, we had to adapt what we already knew and what we could learn to attempt to start coding our idea in a way that was feasible for our experience levels and time available. For example, we decided to make a website because we know more about web development than app development, and we used the skills we learned in the HTML workshop to learn more about front-end development. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Coming in, we all had limited experience in web development, and though attending workshops and beginning to code, we are proud that we were able to gain a better understanding of the many technologies that comprise a website or app. We are happy to have created a simple framework of our app that conveys our idea, although it is not fully functional. What we learned: - We were able to gain familiarity with new technologies, such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. We all were unfamiliar with how an app or website goes from an idea to a working program, since this was the first hackathon all of us participated in. We have now been able to see a more complete, though compressed, picture of the steps that are necessary to make a product. What's next for RoomFinder: - If we were to go further with this project, we would want to create a bridge between the front-end design and back-end code, possibly using Python with Flask. We would make a database to store the dorm pictures and information that would allow users to see the pictures of the room they request. Additional features we brainstormed include a way to see similar or nearby rooms if the requested room has yet to be uploaded. We also envisioned a secure way to contact the previous occupant of a room in order to discuss more about the layout of the room, such as requesting to contact the current owner through the website. We would also want to work on more CSS elements of the website. We mostly focused on HTML for functionality, but if this was a running website, we would like to make it more aesthetic. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/micro-ide

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - I wanted an IDE that worked exactly how I wanted it to. What it does: - It can open a file that you can edit and has syntax highlighting. It can also run files with hashbang! How I built it: - I wrote it in python using tkinter to create the window and pygments to achieve syntax highlighting. Challenges I ran into: - One problem was learning how to make only 1 line of text's syntax highlighting redone every time the user types new values in order to ensure that the program did not run too slow. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - It works more or less flawlessly. What I learned: - I've learnt how to create a windows in python. What's next for Micro-IDE: - Implement the ability to edit multiple files , configurable themes and implement build rules. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/foodie-s-world-4xs2ir

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - To bring a more accessible way for high-school students to order healthy food online and give them an idea of how easy and tasty a healthy food is compared to other fast-foods. What it does: - It provides the user with food menus that they can order from, and play games while they wait for it. And that we also provide them with some articles about how they can make healthy foods at home at a simpler way. How we built it: - I built it with HTML, CSS and python. Challenges we ran into: - Alligning the images and the text in menu. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The style of the website. The idea behind each and every single element in my website. What we learned: - Alignment and complex HTML and CSS attributes. What's next for Foodie's World!: - To create a community chat where we users can share their experience. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/pygchores

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - As college students we realized often the most stressful part of college is simply doing and keeping track of household chores. Our team decided to address this problem by making a companion web app that will help schedule chores for you in the least stressful way possible. Our web app helps us improve home and mental health by making sense of the unpredictability of your day and optimising your schedule around it. What it does: - We created PygChores, a webapp that optimizes your weekly chores. PygChores takes in your hectic schedule, finds lulls in activity, and uses an algorithm to suggests smart times to do your chores. It uses a priority ranking system to determine which chores to do when, and ensures that the distribution of these chores is equal across the days of a week. Simple yet elegant, PygChores allows you to maintain control of your living environment while relieving the stress that comes with it. The wellness you develop at home will carry over to wellness throughout your life. How we built it: - PygChores was built predominantly on Django, utilizing several languages including Python, HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. All collaboration was done using GitHub. Challenges we ran into: - Implementing the Google Calendar API and integrating several languages in the same platform were our biggest challenges. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We're proud that we were able to complete a fully functioning web app by the end of the hackathon. We were able to integrate the Google Calendar API and learned several languages during the course of the 24 hours. Overall, we're proud of our work and wouldn't have done it any other way. What we learned: - The Python Django framework as well as general full-stack coding. We also gained experienced with GitHub and git commands, while developing collaborative skills useful for the future. What's next for PygChores: - Accounting for varying demand of communal resources ex. laundry machines\nDeveloping a more complete implementation of Google Calendar API\nImplement a feature to reschedule chores if you missed doing it ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/wind-turbine-project

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - In order to fit the data to predict the nacelle weight and blade weight, we tried to use a simple linear model and minimise mean squared error. However given the many issing values and the scarcity of the data we had we found this difficult. We were afraid of using more powerful techniques in fear of overfitting the data, so we decided to try generate some of our own data instead. - Extensive internet searching didn't help the cause and we couldn't find any sort of extra datasets online. Furthermore, it didn't help that there was no dataset description available, so we didn't know what a lot of the column names meant at all. With nothing else to turn to, we decided to try and mimic some data using General Adversarial Networks. What it does: - Given some information about wind turbines, we predict the nacelle weight and blade weight of the turbine. How we built it: - Since the data provided was quite limited and there were also some missing values, we imputed the missing values. This gave us more information to work with when training the models. We then trained a GAN to generate more data. A linear regression model is then fitted on the generated and original data to predict the nacelle and blade weight. Challenges we ran into: - Very limited data and troubles with generating good data. There is a balance with complicating our generating model in case it learns to overfit on the data, so we made sure to compare the distribution of the generated data with the real, existing data we had to check similarity. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - The final linear regression with the extra generated data gave the following results: - R2 score:\n0.62\ntrain MAE:\n176.96\ntrain RMSE:\n21.40\n - This was based on the data we had with all entries of nacelle weight filled. For the single blade weight: - R2 score\n0.60\ntrain MAE\n3.12\ntrain RMSE\n4.34\n - We also obtained confidence intervals based on the standard deviations of the residuals of our estimates. A example of a 95% confidence interval for the first missing nacelle weight would be: - (39.21, 81.43, 123.66)\n - And for the first missing single blade weight: - (11.09, 19.65, 28.20)\n What we learned: - The data had a lot of noise, and it was difficult to interpret which variables to excluded and which variables were independent. It was hard to test for any independence at all for the Regions category and the Operator category given that they were either particularly unbalanced or scarce in data points. What's next for Wind turbine project: - The results we obtained weren't spectacular at all. A simple linear regression model was the best we could do to obtain our results. Had we collected more data/had more information, more data preprocessing and feature extraction would certainly enhance our model performance. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/bp-wind-project

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - The CUES Hackathon What it does: - Does a RF on the data provided. Then does a regression on key How we built it: - Initially using Vanilla python, but then switching to Jupyter Notebooks Challenges we ran into: - Never having used ML\nLack of Sleep\nUsing Github Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Using ML What we learned: - Basic ML\nHow to use Git (maybe) What's next for BP Wind Project: - Error analysis\nWeb scraping ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/silence-of-the-labs-djf5wn

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Recent experience of the scary process of submitting practicals What it does: - Runs (usually) and lets you play through a fun game How we built it: - We made it in python and wrote the story in JSON Challenges we ran into: - We were losing our minds trying to get the buttons to work properly and not stay there persistently. We could not do this. So players are haunted by ghosts of options past. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - It's pretty funny, and it looks nifty What we learned: - That a hackathon is not about the final result, but the friends we make along the way. And also that we are bad at pictionary ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/alexapi-colors

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - We already have a raspberry pi so lets make it have alexa! Let's connect it to your phone What it does: - Everything alexa can + a lambda function + control it with your phone How we built it: - android, avs + aws, java Challenges we ran into: - not much documentation online Accomplishments that we're proud of: - I mean it works....not completely What we learned: - That we need to learn alot more What's next for AlexaPi-Colors: - Join us again next week at Hackru ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/polarity-gfe6ar

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - In the past year, we as students have witnessed the awful effects of this country's deeply divided and polarized political landscape. We believe that a solution to this predicament is calm and rational discourse. Our application helps facilitate an environment where people of opposing opinions can do just that: engage in civil discussions about hot button issues. What it does: - Our application facilitates an environment for calm and rational political discussion. It's about bridging the divide, a divide that has only gotten wider in the past decade. The application first asks the user to pick a topic they would like to discuss. Currently, topics range from abortion to vaccines. Once the user selects a topic, they will state their stance on it via one of the following options: “strongly against,” “against,” “neutral,” “support,” “strongly support.” The user is then paired with another user who chooses the same topic but has an opposing viewpoint. Both users in this discussion are anonymous. Users can then chat for as long as they like and can easily end the discussion should one user want to leave. How we built it: - Our team started with a brainstorming session and then designed our app UI on Microsoft Whiteboard. We then proceeded to develop the back-end side of the project, which was developed in java using the Spring framework. After the server was completed, we created the HackMann Socket Protocol, in order to allow both our server and client to interpret the binary being sent between them and convert it into meaningful information. On the client, data would ultimately become json. On the server, data becomes java objects. Once we had this protocol established, we created the Python module to handle connecting and interpreting the information from these websockets. After that, we created the rest of the front-end, which was also done in Python, and we designed our chat page and opinions page using Pycharm and various plug-ins. Challenges we ran into: - Our development process encountered a few problems. First, images and buttons were hard to program, especially since all of our members were new to Python. However, we worked together and were able to create a streamlined approach to handling these buttons and other similar features within the project. Additionally, we ran into issues with moderation, an important element since without moderation our app has the potential to become a platform for hate. As a result, we added a feature for users to quickly exit out of a chat by pressing delete if they encounter a situation where they feel uncomfortable or threatened. Furthermore, if we were to make this into a full-fledged application, we would add additional chat filters and reporting systems. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We are proud of many accomplishments we achieved during HackMann. First and foremost, we are proud of our chat features, which allow users to seamlessly chat with no visible delay. Furthermore, we are proud of the HackMann Socket Protocol, which cleanly and efficiently allows for websocket communication between two different programming languages and is also highly efficient. Finally, as a team, we are proud of all the new coding skills, specifically Python, that we learned during this competition. What we learned: - Going into this competition, all of our members had not used Python before or were very new to it. Therefore, it was a very informative experience to build an app using it from the ground up. We learned about Pycharm and Pygame, and different plugins such as Imageio. Additionally, we also learned how to better leverage websockets to more efficiently integrate our Java server with our Python client. All in all, everyone on our team learned a lot this year and we are very proud of everything we have accomplished. What's next for Polarity: - The issues that Polarity seeks to address are not going away anytime soon; therefore, we hope to expand Polarity and continue to develop it into the future. In order to make this a viable piece of software, we want to develop additional moderation features, as previously discussed. Some of these would include an automatic word filter, a bot to detect when conversations are getting too heated and to suspend them for a cooldown period, and a reporting system. Another feature would be to automatically generate discussion ideas so the app is continuously populated with relevant contentious issues. We would do this by integrating the Twitter API so we can import current issues from the trending page. We believe that there are many additional elements that Polarity can incorporate to make it an even better product going into the future. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/the-new-normal-under-covid

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Enthusiastic about Machine Learning, I wanted to explore NLP as it is a domain of Machine Learning where I have very limited experience. I wanted to perform sentiment classification and see what insights I could gain by applying it to the topic of COVID which is a recent and trending topic. What it does: - The app can dynamically webscrape tweets and apply sentiment classification based on user input and display a bar chart containing the percentage of each sentiment. The extracted tweets are webscraped on the fly, hence the data shown is in real-time. How we built it: - Part 1: Built a sentiment classifier using scikit-learn and NLP. Used Amazon app review dataset, with a sample size of ~50k\nPart 2: Performed webscraping using twint to dynamically classify tweets based on user input. Used streamlit to deploy the classifier into an app, with matplotlib to display data visualisation of the results. Challenges we ran into: - An initial difficulty was the start where I had to consider an appopriate topic which was rich in data yet had plenty of rooms for performing data analysis . Another challenge was to become familiar with multiple libraries within one day as I had no prior experience with streamlit and twint. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - I'm most proud of finishing such a project within a single day on my own after teammates dropped out last minute. As a student who has very limited NLP experience and has never heard of streamlit and twint, there were plenty of things to learn. Working alone was tough and I'm proud of finishing the project within the time frame. What we learned: - I learned to become familiar with twint, streamlit and NLP processes. I learned to work independently and to use persistence, determination and patience to follow my initial plans and complete the project. What's next for Dynamic Sentiment Classifier for Twitter: - The app can have additional functionalities, such as data visualisation options, webscraping from various social media platforms, and perform sentiment analysis into more classes. The user interface can also be improved. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/perfect-playlists

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Often I've felt bored and that I can't find good music to listen to, so I thought I might put the power to make that decision in the hands of an AI and see what it comes up with. What it does: - It contains pop and study playlists for you to see that were created by an LSTM model with data from the top 250 Spotify playlists in each genre. How we built it: - First, track data from the top 250 playlists was taken using the Spotify API and Python. Using the MATLAB Deep Learning Toolbox, an LSTM model was created that takes the track data, learns the tracks used and the sequencing of the tracks, and generates new playlists. The Spotify Web Console was used to create the playlists once I had the track URIs. Challenges we ran into: - One major challenge I ran into was making the model itself. First, I attempted to use a MATLAB LSTM model that would use tokenization on the track IDs and generate new words based on the sequencing of those track IDs. At first, it seemed to work, but once I attempted to train it, it wouldn't train. Since that path had been closed to me, I tried a different approach. I looked at how I could make a character based LSTM model and I changed the model so that it could function on the track IDs I would give it. Though this was much less memory efficient, it seemed to work much better and gave me playlists that I was happy with. - Another major challenge I ran into was making sure that enough data was used, but not too much that the computer would run out of memory. When I attempted to train the model for the first time, I tried using 1000 playlists rather than 250, which caused the script to fail due to an 'Out of memory' error, mainly because of the size of the X and Y vectors used. I then tried a few numbers for the number of playlists to train it on and 250 seemed to be a good number, so that was used. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - I am proud that I was able to learn to make a MATLAB LSTM model over the weekend as I'd never used it before. What we learned: - I learned a lot about MATLAB and how to use the Deep Learning Toolbox. What's next for Perfect Playlists: - Possibly creating playlists for more genres and attempting to use more training data. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/the-power-saver

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - When I am working on a big project I normally spend to much time on it and am bored but just by running this program you can have a break from coding and cut down on your energy use to save the world. What it does: - It will play top quality music for you and stop you from using your computer for just long enough to have a great break. How we built it: - just in python I used vscode though. Challenges we ran into: - getting the timing just right and over all just testing the project. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - making a fully functioning program What we learned: - not to make a 30.5 gig game in ue4 because you can't put it in GitHub What's next for The power saver: - world domination and some awesome collaborations. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/trojansafe

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Spring 2021 being our first semester, we recently moved to LA. We used to get DPS crime alert notifications, in spite of living in the DPS zone and having the DPS resources for safety and precautions, we felt the need to know the neighborhood areas before traveling and have all this information in one place. Since we have a huge Trojan family the application such as TrojanSafe will be extremely useful. What it does: - TrojanSafe is a web application that will prioritize the safety of the Trojan families by keeping them Safe, Aware, and Worryfree. TrojanSafe targets the DPS zones and provides users with information about safe neighborhoods at the destination. How we built it: - The crime data is extracted from the official website of DPS using web scrapping. Using Google's geocoding API, we fetched and stored coordinates of all the scrapped crime locations in sqlite3 DB. Now, when we get the journey details of the user, we use it to extract the nearby crime locations along the route thus telling them if it's safe or not. Next, an entire web application is built using HTML5, and Bootstrap, to display the crime locations on the map. It is hosted using Flask. Challenges we ran into: - The main challenges we ran into were: - \nPre-processing steps- The data was scraped from the DPS website, it was not uniform and thus it was needed to be converted into the required format. Cleaning the text in order to get the relevant data, was one of the challenges we faced.\nLocation plotting on the map - Since none of us had any experience in website development, the plotting of markers on Google maps was one of the hardest parts.\n Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Getting the entire application up in a working condition, given the time constraints, is an accomplishment we are all proud of. What we learned: - \nWeb Scrapping.\nUse of Geocoding Google API.\nFlask Framework.\n What's next for TrojanSafe: - We have a few things planned - - \nExpanding the coverage area from DPS zones to LA county.\nEnabling Safety for different modes of transportation. \nPerform Data Analysis in order to extract the crime pattern and trends.\nEnable a scheduling mechanism to update the trojanSafe DB with additional crime data.\n ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/agromart

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Farmers usually get marginal profits due to middlemen, most of the revenue is spent in transporting their produce to central hubs which adds on to their woes. Alleviating these two costs would enable the farmer to increase his profits tremendously. What it does: - AgroMart helps users find local farms in the area which provide condiments. The user can directly interact with the farms using our swipe interface and can easily add products which he likes. The user can then place the order, travel to the farm and collect the order. How we built it: - Frontend: We mainly used Angular, Bootstrap and TypeScript for this. The customer can search for a particular product (either by text or by uploading a picture). The results can then be filtered based on price of product or/and location of farm. The user can know more about the product by clicking on product card and can keep adding the products he wishes to purchase, to the cart. Finally, the customer can checkout from his cart.\nBackend: We have used Node JS to send and receive user requests and responses. We use this as an interface between front end and the DB and also to communicate with the ML model. \nMachine Learning: The user can upload a picture of what he wants, this would filter his options, allowing him to select from what he needs. Challenges we ran into: - Augmenting data to achieve higher accuracy on real world scenarios.\nIntegrating everything end to end.\nCalling the ML model server from NodeJS.\nUsing routing and outlet in Angular to have auxiliary routes and views. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - We were able to design and implement the MVP, which proves that such an idea is feasible and would also contribute to a noble cause\nWe were able to incorporate single page application using Angular\nWith the help of Bootstrap, we could make the page responsive\nWe could incorporate functionalities like getting user's current location, to filter out nearby locations of farms, to let a user upload an image of product rather than text, as per their convenience. The upload feature can also come handy when the name of fruit/vegetable, etc. is not always known.\nUsers can add items to the cart, for later use What we learned: - Hosting a flask server on heroku, training a CNN from scratch, trying to tune parameters for the model, and Data augmentation\nUsing ML model with web development and exposing it to the UI What's next for AgroMart: - Complete the application end to end, and to try to improve the image recognizer algorithm.\nHaving 2 views - for Seller and the Buyer\nAdding more filtering options such as ratings, popularity of the farm, reviews on a product, etc. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/similaripy

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: What we have done: - We have taken the similarity score of all the possible pairs of vectors representation of several texts (requirements) given by GESSI UPC University group project which is calculated using a Cosine distance. Then using that information as a matrix we have created an index using NMSLIB (source: and implemented a clusterization algorithm by thresholding and selecting a number of neighbours. Challenges we ran into: - We did not have a lot of time to develop our ideas. The brainstorming was a bit rush, and we are not used to it. Moreover, the dataset and method to validate our model were a little difficult to deal with. What we learned: - We've never used nmslib or neither done a clustering algorithm so we can say that almost everything of what we've done it was new to us. What's next for Similaripy: - Re-think about the way it is computed the accuracy for the model and experiment with several parameters to get the best result. We could try several ways to compute the distance and its similarity score instead of the Cosine distance. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/estime

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - Some of my family members suffer from aesthetic condition and all I can say is that their self-confidence has dropped since being diagnosed. With no free support from the NHS put in place, the society has made it our mission to give them support and fund their needs, working in partnership with other charities in order to give them what they need to boost their self-esteem. What it does: - The web application's main purpose is to provide guidance from professionals in the format of Q&A sessions and posts. The businesses can also promote the products and services they are offering. How we built it: - For the front-end development I have used a combination of JavaScript, HTML5 and CSS3 to develop the interface, and add some responsive features. For the back-end development I have implemented a SQLite database using the flask-admin extension. Challenges we ran into: - The use of sessions for the log in systems, as well as the use of sessions for the posts filtering option, as I have some limited experience in working with AJAX. Accomplishments that we're proud of: - Basic functionality of the website works as desired - the registration and log in forms. What we learned: - I have strengthened my knowledge of JavaScript and AJAX. What's next for 'Éstime': - \nBooking system linked to the calendar so that we can keep track and monitor with what kind of content the users want to engage with.\nFor the business accounts we could create an insights page, such that the professional account holders can view statistics of their posts, who their target audience is, in order to learn more about trends.\n ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback:

https://devpost.com/software/kovi-deep-learning-chatbot-hacksmu-2020-submission

You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance. ###Task Description: Provided is an instruction, a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria. 1. Write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric. 2. Write a concise feedback within 50 words that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general. 3. The output format should look as follows: "Feedback: (write feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)" 4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations. ###The instruction to evaluate: Evaluate the following project description based on two criteria on a 5-point likert scale: Novelty and Usefulness. Novelty: How unique and original is the project's concept, approach, or solution? Does it introduce new ideas, methods, or perspectives that are significantly different from existing ones? Usefulness: How practical and appropriate is the project in addressing the problem, situation, or challenge its targets? Does it effectively solve a real-world issue or meet a specific need? ###Response to evaluate: Inspiration: - A chatbot is often described as one of the most advanced and promising expressions of interaction between humans and machines. For this reason I wanted to create one in order to become affiliated with Natural Language Processing and Deep-Learning through neural networks. - Due to the current pandemic, we are truly living in an unprecedented time. As the virus' spread continues, it is important for all citizens to stay educated and informed on the pandemic. So, I designed a chatbot named Kovi who a user can talk to, and get latest information regarding COVID-19. - (This bot is designed to function similarly to ones used on websites for companies such as Amazon or Microsoft, in which users can interact with the bot to ask questions they would normally ask to a customer service member, although through the power of AI and deep learning, the bot can answer these questions for the customer on it's own) What it does: - Kovi answers questions the user has regarding COVID-19. - More specifically, the training data I fed into my feed-forward neural network to train Kovi falls under 5 categories: - I also added three more categories of data for Kovi to learn, those being greetings, thanks and goodbyes, so the user can have a conversation with Kovi which is more human-like. How I built it: - First, I had to create my training data. Commonly referred to as 'intentions', the data I used to train Kovi consisted of different phrases that a user could potentially ask. I split up all of my intentions into 7 categories, which I listed above, and these were called 'tags'. Under my sub-branch of tags, I would provide Kovi several phrases the user could ask about that tag, and also gave it responses to choose from to answer questions related to that tag. Once the intentions were made, I put this data in a json file for easy access in the rest of the project. - Second, I had to use 3 artificial-intelligence, natural language processing, techniques to process the data, before it was fed into my training model. These were 'bag-of-words', 'tokenization' and 'stemming'. First, bag-of-words is a process which took a phrase, which were all listed under the tags, and created an array of all the words in that phrase, making sure there are no repeats of any words. This array was assigned to an x-variable. A second y-variable delineated which tag this bag-of-words belonged to. After these bags-of-words were created, tokenization was applied through each bag-of-words and split them up even further into individual words, special characters (like @,#,$,etc.) and punctuation. Finally, stemming created a crude heuristic, i.e. it chopped off the ending suffixes of the words (organize and organizes both becomes organ), and replaced the array again with these new elements. These three steps were necessary, because the training model is much more effective when the data is pre-processed in this way, it's most fundamental form. - Next, I made the actual training model. This model was a feed-forward neural network with 2 hidden layers. The first step was to create what are called hyper-parameters, which is a standard procedure for all neural networks. These are variables that can be adjusted by the user to change how accurate you want your data to be. Next, the network began with 3 layers which were linear, and these were the layers which inputted the data which was pre-processed earlier. Next, these were passed on into what are called activation functions. Activation functions output a small value for small inputs, and a larger value if its inputs exceed a threshold. If the inputs are large enough, the activation function "fires", otherwise it does nothing. In other words, an activation function is like a gate that checks that an incoming value is greater than a critical number. - The training was completed, and the final saved model was saved into a 'data.pth' file using pytorch's save method. - Finally, the user interface for communicating with Kovi was made. To run Kovi, I created a pathway through terminal using pytorch, and a user simply needs to run the chat.py file through command line. Challenges I ran into: - The most obvious challenge was simply time constraints. I spent most of my time trying to make sure my training model was efficient, and had to search up several different articles and tutorials on the correct methodology and API's to use. Numpy and pytorch were the best ones. Accomplishments that I'm proud of: - This was my first deep-learning project so I am very proud of completing at least the basic prototype. Although I was aware of NLP techniques such as stemming and tokenization, this is my first time actually implementing them in action. I have created basic neural nets in the past, but also never a feed-forward one which provides an entire model as its output. What I learned: - I learned a lot about deep learning, neural nets, and how AI is trained for communication in general. This was a big step up for me in Machine Learning. What's next for Kovi: Deep Learning Chatbot for COVID-19: - I will definitely improve on this in the future by updating the model, providing a lot more types of questions/data related to COVID-19 for Kovi to be trained on, and potentially create an external UI, although I do like the intuitive ease of use that comes with the integration to the terminal. ###Score Rubrics: Use a five-point scale for rating, where: Novelty: 1 is Very Unoriginal 2 is Unoriginal 3 is Neutral 4 is Original 5 is Very Original Usefulness: 1 is Very Unuseful 2 is Unuseful 3 is Neutral 4 is Useful 5 is Very Useful ###Score and Feedback: